9/11 Plane #2 went "completely in one side, and out the other..." said ABC's Peter Jennings
9/11 Tuesday: Diving back into dat dere beautiful autumn day in New York
Prologue:
We did maybe fifteen 9/11 posts last year, curating various research from Barbara Honneger, Jim Fetzer, Judy Wood, Richard Chandler, James Corbett (CHD-d?) and many more.
I’ll link several below.
Add Christopher Bollyn to the current mix, and Bollyn will take you straight to the Israel No Fly Zone (pardon the pun) with receipts aplenty, very much as Reagan staffer Barbara Honneger did as well.
https://rumble.com/v46uh6o-christopher-bollyn-solving-9-11-the-deception-that-changed-the-world.html
For this latest series of posts, I am clipping the more persuasive aspects of a 9/11 video forensics series made by filmmaker/musician Ace Barker.
I started doing 9/11 research after TFish red-pilled me in one comment.
Because I had simply never asked the right questions, promo code Day Tapes.
I was a Sweet Summer Child.
As with COVID, it does not take that long doing basic research to arrive at an anomaly that must be explained by the State.
How does a plane disappear into the ground in Pennsylvania?
Donald Rumsfeld slipped and said the quiet part out loud.
Where is the Pentagon plane video footage in the most heavily secured military compound in the world?
How did a plane bust apart into that small hole at the Pentagon?
Where is all the debris?
Have you ever seen plane crash footage?
How did the Pentagon lawn stay pristine?
How did these adorable little fire trucks put out the supposed superpower jet fuel fires at the Pentagon?
And then you are off into the weeds.
But you only need one anomaly, and you will find that the anomaly can never be properly explained.
And now you are the “conspiracy theorist”.
"completely in one side, and out the other..." said ABC's Peter Jennings; Building 7 “collapse” is called prematurely by BBC
Here is today’s video edit, focusing on the video forensics and corporate news hoop-jumping on that fateful day in September.
Seven minute video.
What became apparent last year as I dived into 9/11 was that many do now understand that the official 9/11 narrative was false.
And that many get quite angry at YOU for asking basic questions.
When the scope and magnitude of the Psy Op just gets too great, folks melt down like skyscrapers in NYC.
To my perhaps unique way of processing phenomena, once one has seen even ONE anomaly and then the State or the State’s regulatory agencies, or the State’s propaganda organs of the corporate media and corporate internet are demonstrably lying or obfuscating…now one knows.
You may not know the particulars.
You may not know if viruses exist or if they can spread and murder the world.
You may not know if the Towers were wired with explosives or if Directed Energy weapons were used, (hint: why not both?), or if mini-nukes were used.
But you can easily spot that building don’t fall down at free fall speed due to fire.
Including buildings that were never struck by an alleged plane.
9/11 Psy Oppery and Mass Formation Psy Oppery in General
One of the things that make Global Psy Ops and false flags difficult to parse is the seeming inability of very sharp people to focus on one element and stay right there in the pocket and absorb the blows of not knowing without jumping to some other hot button (usually emotional) element or several.
People that have eyes to see will recognize chicanery in government narratives, but then they will get lost in the fee-fee spaces of ideology and heroes and religions and tribal in-groups and dueling alternative explanations…and AWAY WE GO.
The government spins the most elaborate “conspiracy theories” and by the way, “conspiracy theory” is a thought terminating cliche.
It simply means, KEEP OUT.
STOP ASKING QUESTIONS.
Stay right here, Truman. We have everything you need right here.
Okay, here are the two episodes from Ace Barker’s fine treatment of video forensics on 9/11 that I am largely working from in this truncated series:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XvEr48fsvXQK/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/H2RcrIF7onQP/
Ep. 7 I may run more or less intact as it lays out how the video editing gets done (compositing) and how the time delays of “live” TV enable honest reactions from TV reporters inconvenient to State narratives can be dumped live.
This filmmaker does great work exposing enormous logical problems with the official 9/11 Conspiracy Government Narrative.
I personally find the use of music when overdone can perversely work against the stark anomalies presented but that may be a simple difference in opinion as to how to fight guerrilla information wars.
(One of the things that made me very suspicious of the NYC Simulation Expert Sell the Panic videos was the use of scary music. Looking at you NYT and Colleen Smith.)
One thing I can assure you.
That New York Good Day footage with the nose of the plane shooting out the other side should have been blasted repeatedly as the only live footage of the “event”.
It should have been, and it was not.
A live call of the greatest act of terrorism consigned to the official vault forever.
I do not claim to know the secrets of 9/11, but I do understand the official story is a cover for something else. With that being said, 9/11 was what pushed me outside of the matrix. I do not remember the date exactly, I think it was in October (but before thanksgiving) in 2001 when it hit me like a ton of bricks that they were lying. It was a sudden realization that was so strong it created a visceral reaction. I felt tingly and to be honest, a bit scared. I was 19 and this didn't make sense. I had my doubts about other things, but it was the event in Pennsylvania that broke the veil, the propaganda with the whole "lets role" was just too much. Something wasn't right. At the time I had been learning how to fly a 172E and was contemplating the crash of flight 93 and how that must have been for the passengers. Then it dawned on me. It was staring at me right in the face. The physics did not add up. No matter how fast a plane was traveling in a vertical descent, the debris field from the collision with the ground would not exceed a mile, perhaps not even half a mile. Most I suspect would be within a quarter mile, but again they try to tell us that most of the plane disappeared underground. So, leaving that there, why was debris scattered over an 8 mile range? To be clear, I do know someone who collected debris at about 5 miles out that I do trust as much as a person can be outside of your immediate circle. ( large pieces, not paper) The debris field matches what one would expect if a plane was shot down at 35k feet. I have seen others claim that "physics does weird things with such an impact"... but this is farcical, much like other "weird physics" from that day. It was at a great location for a plane to be taken down, a very rural area. With all of that being said, I do not know what happened. Years later (maybe ten ago?) I found David McGowan who wrote some about 93 that resembles what I thought/knew. I have since been down many rabbit holes and have considered many things. What I do know over 20 years later, they are lying and still are to this day. About everything. Everything everywhere about everything. This is what they do. They lie and then flood the information space. I do not think we will ever know the whole truth. The system compartmentalizes intelligence way too effectively, keeping each data point in its own silo. We may see glimpses of things, but unless the system is made completely transparent (they way a constitutional republic should have always been) we will never know the big picture. Yet, we all should know enough by now to know it all needs dismantled. The system will indeed kill you and everyone you know for an agenda.
That’s my position as well. If you find an anomaly and it can’t be explained it throws the whole story into disrepute. It would be like watching a good film only to have the hero suddenly remember he had a laser gun in his pocket with which he blasts the villain and thus saves the day. It’s a plot problem that needs to be resolved. You can’t have a glaring issue with a particular part of the story and just expect that we can carry on with the rest of it. Now the whole narrative is in doubt, the whole thing needs to be reassessed because planes don’t disappear into the ground - they really don’t and if something that big is wrong with the narrative - what about all the other stuff?