"Graphene-based nanoparticles possess remarkable physiochemical properties, making them promising for diverse applications in biomedicine, agriculture, food, and industrial applications."
***** The abstract goes on: "These nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19."
Graphene-based nanoparticles possess remarkable physiochemical properties, making them promising for diverse applications in biomedicine, agriculture, food, and industrial applications. These nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19. Human and environmental exposure to graphene-based nanomaterials is increasing at an unprecedented rate. However, there is still a huge knowledge gap regarding its safety in clinical applications. The topic remains controversial; although several routes of degradation exist, the cytotoxicity of graphene-based nanoparticles has been demonstrated. Various factors that can influence the cytotoxicity of graphene-based materials are discussed. This review summarizes the physiochemical properties of graphene-based materials and critically examines the possible effects of graphene-based nanoparticles on the molecular level and adverse health outcomes. While oxidative stress-mediated cell damage has been proposed as a primary cytotoxicity mechanism for graphene-based materials, various in vivo biodistribution and cytotoxicity mechanisms are also highlighted. Therefore, this review of the literature provides an overview of the cytotoxicity of GBMs and raises concerns about their widespread application with potential hazardous consequences on the environment and human health.
You don’t say.
The study author is Matthew Halma and Heidi N du Preez.
Does that first name sound familiar?
Let’s go back one year to a bizarrely cheerful post from Dr. Peter McCullough… the infamous “mRNA Off to a Bad Start but Future May be Brighter” post.
Yes I wrote that up immediately.
Yes it was an utter shit storm.
Matthew Halma, Jessica Rose, and Tess Lawrie.
Dr. Peter McCullough’s Stack here:
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
We all have the tendency to paint issues with a broad brush. That is to see things one way for intellectual simplicity. “All pharmaceuticals are bad” or “I don’t trust any vaccine.” It is even more tempting to take a negative view on all new technology when the product launch in humans fails to a large degree.
These old mental saws could apply to mRNA vaccines. Halma et al have published a scoping review of lipid nanoparticle-mRNA products with fair balance causing the reader to consider future possibilities. The COVID-19 vaccines are known to be unsafe for several reasons: 1) the Wuhan Spike protein damages cells, tissues, organs, and causes blood clotting, 2) the lipid nanoparticles may have toxicity from the PEG or polysorbate 80 or from syncytia formation, 3) the mRNA appears to be resistant to ribonucleases and is not broken down in the body. As some point the mRNA or fragments could interfere with gene function or alter other microRNAs that are managing the human genome.
The Halma paper points out that safe mRNA products are possible. For example, properly designed mRNA coding for normal proteins that are deficient or ones that are sufficiently humanized and not recognized by the body as foreign could indeed become part of the future pharmacopeia. But there is no doubt that the first use of mRNA on a mass, indiscriminate scale has been a disaster with the COVID-19 vaccine campaign.
If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.
At the time, I found it to be an oddly cheery and hopeful spin on mRNA “technology” by Dr. Peter McCullough.
Later I saw that Elon Musk had tweeted much the same at the same juncture.
And…
McCullough’s hopey spin foreshadowed Bret Weinstein waxing profound about the “elegant technology” of mRNA with Tucker Carlson while hand waving at the 17-million dead and of course not mentioning that the 17-m figure comes from Denis Rancourt who also said that we did not have a pandemic.
I wrote up what Bret Weinstein was really telling you here.
See, I’m fluent in bullshit.
Now right here is the point where I’m just going to track this back a bit.
Not all the way, because I’m mid-research on this.
But my gut already knows.
And the Tier Twos are trying to push this Stack to slip up while “promoting” it, so I’m going to use very measured language and leave some data points.
Boutique Stack or no, there ain’t that many still digging into this because that party sure is lively and you get to wear a floppy hat and feel super-duper pretty but really you have lipstick on your teeth and you ain’t pretty.
Here is another study from Halma, along with Tess Lawrie and Paul Marik and Christopher Plothe.
Abstract
In the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, a need has arisen to prevent and treat two related conditions, COVID-19 vaccine injury and long COVID-19, both of which can trace at least part of their aetiology to the spike protein, which can cause harm through several mechanisms. One significant mechanism of harm is vascular, and it is mediated by the spike protein, a common element of the COVID-19 illness, and it is related to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Given the significant number of people experiencing these two related conditions, it is imperative to develop treatment protocols, as well as to consider the diversity of people experiencing long COVID-19 and vaccine injury. This review summarizes the known treatment options for long COVID-19 and vaccine injury, their mechanisms, and their evidentiary basis.
This appears to be the basis for Spike Support, the dilemma that Dr. Jane Ruby discussed here:
And the basis for the Spike Support still relies on the premise that there was a novel coronavirus (“This thing is different!” said Kory), and this novel RESPIRATORY VIRUS had all kinds of effects that persist including vascular harm.
The VIRUS simply must be included with the shots.
The VIRUS simply must be included with the shots.
The VIRUS has a SPIKE PROTEIN.
SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY (AND VASCULAR) SYNDROME
SARVS.
The World Council For Health is going to have to wait for another post.
This is Tess Lawrie’s organization that I can tell.
The study, published this week in the MDPI journal, Microorganisms, cited the vascular harm commonly seen as a result of Covid-19 illness or after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and the need for therapies for both direct and indirect treatment to counter the effects of the spike protein from Covid-19. The study also discussed a variety of treatments for long Covid and Covid-19 vaccine injury that have shown varying degrees of success, including nutritional support, establishing a healthy microbiome, and using drugs that can inhibit spike protein and neutralize its harmful effects.
The Better Way Conference in Bath England put on by Tess Lawrie of course featured Bret Weinstein, noted expert.
There he be.
There he be again.
"These (graphene-based) nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19."
Said Halma.
Here is the study.
https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NBE.2024.9290059
Somebody smart read this study as I am over my head here.
But I find it odd. Again.
Odd.
That glowing statement in the abstract.
Very much like Dr. Peter’s glowing tightrope straddle or Evergreen Boy’s “elegant technology” framing on mRNA.
Now with zeeee graphene.
Which caused a shit storm at a Freedom Conference and all the usual Tier Two suspects started trying to pump the brakes on discussing graphene in the shots.
This was a major point of contention between Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger at the Sweden Conference last year.
Bigtree and Cole both looked terrified in the above segment.
What’s the big deal, fellows?
Halma and Heidi said that graphene-based nanoparticles had been used in the fight against COVID-19.
"Graphene-based nanoparticles possess remarkable physiochemical properties, making them promising for diverse applications in biomedicine…”
"These nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19."
Is it washing over you right about now?
https://ko-fi.com/sagehanaproductions64182
Hello,
Thank you very much for your comment on my experience of censorship in the resistance, which continues and helps us reveal the 2nd line of attack on humanity by building, a narrative that will bring us back to “their normal corrupt one world business” i.e. accept old vaccines for example, or get back to accept what our fake”innocent” government want, or continuing to pay illegal taxes to the privately lead one world government.
⚠️ See the interview of Mike Benz with Tucker Carson, it’s very revealing of what we are living.
I just want to make sure not to see what I never said, and am at the wrong target : I am not censoring Big Deltree whom I really like as a person and personally met last year in the USA. He invited me 3 times to speak freely with no censorship. His questions were really open and non-biased .
He has a position of an open media, disclosing the truth and inviting all areas … you can ask him, but from what I know his policy is to fight for the truth and not get into a “controlled opposition” which would mean he doesn’t fight for the truth..
So even if he might be in a difficult position of people trying to control him at some point.. you can invite us, and he will accept.
What I have experimented with some people from specific groups is that they are organizing events, and choosing very carefully between themselves who they invite (some even pretending not to know each other), such as those working for the CHD children health defense group, which organized lots of conferences in Europe with the same US experts in 2022/2023 touring together in Europe - they have clearly trued to silence/censor me in Sweden twice :
1) at the Malmö conference of Northern Light in Spring 2022 (where i was invited to speak on WHO and where they took me off the program on site and gave 2 speech slots to the Swiss tax payer (although my title was given + travel/accommodation paid),
2) at the Stockholm conference January 2023 where Ryan Cole,, Van der Bosche and CHD and Swedish organizers stopped me on stage and in tge debate free m telling the truth about nanotech/graphene... the head of CHD Europe even said :”Stop her, she is going to discredit us!” (discredit of what…i still wonder 🤔)
I do not accuse RFK whom i met (either he does not know who is hired and what they did/do, either he knows and is working in a plan to reveal something, ir he agrees…) - now that he is a proeminent democrat candidate, there is clearly a political agenda - he is occupying a position that nobody else can take in the Democrats - that might be for the good …even if we have these control freaks in his group) - BTW they were many at the Washington ICS-5 last month - i just analyzed the list of the French etc, I can confirm most are backed up by the government or some hidden/secret society/group, and do not accept to disclose the truth, such as graphene oxide/5G (one of the best indicator that something is wrong).
To note: some of the people around RFK in the USA are great, but those that were with me in Europe, from the USA were definitely there to censor me, but I do have names and witnesses and proofs/evidence of my own censorship by CHD members… if I do not comply to only talk about accusing WHO - they then copy and parrot everything I say, omitting that I talked about the security council criminal totalitarian decision-making, deciding who will take/keep key positions and who is directing the UN system (including WHO) = the world, the international justice, the international conventions on bio weapons, etc.
Those people pop up in all countries including a Swiss tax lawyer that made many bad tricks…they are clearly not going deep into the matter, seem to be obeying to a group paying them, and just taking what they need from what i say and texts i mention, ignoring of the whole system beyond WHO, and the responsibility of government + private sector.
The nanotechnological and alien content of the vaccine related to the 5-6G + Optogenetic Lights/sounds of the smart cities/ID agenda in is a key aspect in what is going on.
So know that the choice of words is at the center of the war on understanding with mass deletion of words/truth to know who is pushing the takeover agenda by covering up, the truth, and who is working for “the truth”!
Dr Astrid Stuckelberger
Psst….look up Ian F. Akyildiz. Then look up the Internet of Bio-Nano Things, aka IoBNT.
To get you started down the rabbit hole….where and how the graphene may come into play?
https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/NNI_17-0817_Progress%20In%20Convergence-Basic%20Concepts%20and%20Applications_%40MexicoCity_MC%20Roco_45min_web.pdf
That’s a wee bit of a roadmap, if you will, of the intentions and smarts of them their STEMS.
You can just imagine the fin/tech elite salivating over the possible social impact markers that would accompany this level of surveillance and control. That is, between automation and surveillance…they dictate how we live because we will be dependent on them for not only our existence (you think people’s addiction to cell phones/screens is bad, you haven’t seen anything yet) but our governance (that’s the whole “public/private partnerships” they want us to trust…a softer/gentler form of fascism…but still fundamentally equates to rules for thee but not for me).
The world as their lab! We and how we live become human capital to be managed, like a giant ant computer. For our benefit of course…perfecting the human race and our environs through the constant study of data and tweaking of algorithms for our very existence. They use to call it behavior modification…think Pavlov’s dog. It is just now, they are quite confident that they have the means to access biometrics of us “hackable humans” and begin engineering our evolution going forward. But for our benefit of course.
The ostensible reason and then there is the underside of the belly of the beast (system). Caveat Emptor.
And believe it or not there is a rabbit hole beyond this one. That one has to do with their realization that it is about energy and their further efforts to hack human consciousness.
Good grief…it is like they will not quit until they become God. Hence, why some of us see it as a spiritual war…a fight to remain human. They seek to unlock nature’s/the divine’s secrets not out of respect and awe, but with a belief that they can control the future with a totality of control not yet seen.
Lest we forget…
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. “
-Lord Acton