"Ivermectin is not found in nature. It must be artificially synthesized."
Dr. Sam Bailey
Time Code 2:29 in the following video re-posted by MeStuff here.
My second time through on this video. Very well explained.
I ran a clip of this video in some post a while back.
Anyway, that quote stuck with me as well as Sam’s sharp analysis of the reverse psychology “hidden” Ivermectin that was everywhere while being hushed up allegedly.
I would like to open up the discussion on the synthetic manufacture of a seemingly understood golf course bacteria / “natural bacterium products”/ which are hydrogenated. *Hydrogen are added to them, and I gather this addition of a chemical element makes them synthetic, correct?
Was IVM pitched to naturopaths or what have you as natural?
This is not my world, so please I ask in full curiosity.
I have only now begun to understand the larger picture of the Natural Healing Universe set up in contrast to the Rockefeller Medicine Universe.
Good thing the WHO found it highly safe and effective.
It would be great if we could have an insightful discussion but it would also be great if the owners of the world weren’t running access to bodies herd culls.
A lot of people pushing a lot of products that need to go INTO YOUR BODY.
Mike Yeadon’s post today says that the ivermectin psy-op has at least 2 functions: to support the pandemic narrative (since mectin’s a “cure”) and to impair fertility -- he also explains why this had to have been planned well in advance..
https://open.substack.com/pub/drmikeyeadon/p/no-publicity-is-bad-publicity?r=jw7ve&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
“there is a body of literature back in the 1990s and later, showing that, at sufficiently high doses, ivermectin has adverse effects on reproductive health of several species of animals. General rule of thumb in toxicology is anything that happens in more than one species is assumed also to happen in humans. Now we’re talking only of safety margins, if any, over the recommended human doses.”
I have become increasingly skeptical of organized alternative medicine. I don't mean the individual practitioners of alternative medicine, many of whom are often very smart, caring, and observant people.
It is the knowledge base of alternative medicine that I mean when I say "organized alternative medicine." I've gone to alternative medicine practitioners most of my life, so I'll speak from that experience. (Unfortunately I've also used conventional medicine with worse results when it came to medications, almost all bad. I assumed I was hypersensitive, lucky for me though)
Early on I went to various chiropractors. I learned to spot the ones who had gone to the professional training seminars. They were very likely to have you come back more than you needed. The best I ever went to I had several very effective treatments, and he said "come back if the problem comes back." The worst had charts and graphs to convince me I need twice weekly treatments. No way.
I've had the same functional medicine dr for over a couple decades now. What I like about him is that if he suggests something that doesn't make sense to me and I say no, he rarely tries to convince me otherwise. I also like that he will run tests to find what's really going on, and he's good at it. Many of the things he's recommended have helped. He got me off a couple of dangerous pharma drugs when I was naive about them. Bless his soul.
He also goes to a fair number of seminars. This, I believe, is where the scorpion info seeps in. For instance, functional medicine docs are fond of antibiotics. Where did that come from? Currently I'm concerned about supplements. I'm concerned that scorp info is in there. Mind you, I take some that have helped me live a reasonably good life. A couple of them I started on my own. If I go off them (inadvertently) things go south within a week or two.
I'm sure that the scorps push things and feed info to the alternative docs, incorrect, falsified research, etc.. They'd ultimately like to get rid of these folks, I think, so all medicine can be their hospital protocols.
I've used many other alternative practitioners and types with good results and have learned from them. I do wish I'd never had a conventional MD, though. More harm than good.