More Corroboration that Yes, indeed, the Day Tapes are legit and Yes, indeed, the Thought Leaders have been wanting to kill you for a very long time
More Corroboration that Yes, indeed, the Day Tapes are legit and Yes, indeed, the Thought Leaders have been wanting to kill you for a very long time
Promo Code ABC News Eisenbrainvector
Influence Watch.org
https://www.influencewatch.org/
Population Connection is a left-leaning nonprofit advocacy group that supports global population control policies. The organization was founded in 1968 as Zero Population Growth by environmentalist and population control activist Paul Ehrlich directly following the publication of his controversial 1968 book, The Population Bomb.
Okay, let’s just sit with this for a minute.
Environmentalism and Population Control.
What would it look like?
If you wished to save the world?
And you felt like some tough decisions had to be made?
Put on your Murder the World Scorpion Hat.
Would you really show up and just say, LISTEN Y’ALL WE NEED A BUNCH OF YOU TO FUCKING GET DEAD REAL SOON. WHO WANTS TO VOLUNTEER? AND STOP POPPING OUT USELESS EATER KIDZ YOU DISGUSTING COCKROACHES.
Would it meeebbeeeee kinda look like this?
Like, hey guys…we all gotta come together and stuff.
I’m concerned about this but I will still be flying on private jets and eating top shelf filet mignon and no we are not going to rein in our US Mall Cop Military which is the greatest gross polluter in a landslide but can you pesky little cockroaches just stay in your fucking hovel?
Do you really want that STATUS QUO of you moving around willy-nilly to continue?
Environmentalist Bobby:
Kirsch:
Kirsch warns of hooooman extinction due to klimate change on his blog in 2007.
https://www.skirsch.com/politics/globalwarming/Extinction.htm
Here are the details...
Ostensibly, we will die due to the effects of global warming. By 2100, according to the IPCC consensus report (see Table SPM.3 on page 13 and footnote 5 on page 2 which explains the ranges in the table), there is a 5% chance that the average temperature of the planet will rise by more than 6.4ºC. That's in the report, clear as day, but nobody talks about it because only a few people understand exactly what that means to our planet. But one guy from the UK (who has hardly gotten any press in the US) Mark Lynas, has done the research on what this means. Lynas spent 3 years of his life poring over 10,000 scientific papers and found that, although it doesn't sound like a lot, a 6ºC temperature rise will pretty much wipe out just about every life form on the planet, us included. Although IPCC scientists had previously projected that there was only a 5% chance of more than a 6.4ºC warming by 2100, the assumptions on which those projections are based have already been exceeded, which is pointed out in this paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The paper points out that the assumptions in all 6 emission scenarios considered by the IPCC have already been exceeded. So that's why I am using the numbers from the A1FI scenario, which gave a 5% chance of exceeding 6.4ºC by 2100. If it doesn't happen by 2100, it will not be long after. I wrote a short web page "Why global warming should be every candidate's #1 priority" describing this in detail.
The bottom line is this: unless we change our ways, there is more than a 5% chance of a mass human extinction in less than 100 years. I'm just telling you what the overwhelming scientific consensus is. Whether or not you choose to believe it is, of course, up to you. If you do disagree, what is the scientific basis for your disagreement? Do you know something the scientists don't?
If we are going to save humanity from extinction, we had better be doing something about these 3 issues:
global warming
overpopulation
the accelerating decline of every single major ecosystem
All of these trends are getting worse. None have been reversed at a global scale. We need action on all three. But right now, none of the candidates have the courage to even talk about serious solutions. In fact, on some issues, they won't even talk about the problem!
Uh oh…😅
Garden Gnome:
et tu, Bioweapon Lifer?
(This is perhaps the least shocking development.)
Jeffrey Sachs
Hey, didn’t this Thought Leader also do some Kovid Whistleblowing? LOL.
Wanna see some more Thought Leaders before we go back in time to link up zeeeee non-profit and zeeeeee Rockefeller Insider Planned Parenthood dude Richard Day right around that 1968-1969 timeline?
Okay, here is a one minute primer from now-deceased pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Dunegan recalling a 1969 presentation (I believe the YouTube upload date graphic is off by a year).
👆 This is Dunegan being interviewed by Stan Monteith who yes…is (was) a real dude.
Tape #4, Depopulation is the key point that launched Day Tapes-reporting Dr. Lawrence Dunegan’s interview with radio host Stan Monteith.
Real person. As is Randy Engel who also interviewed Lawrence Dunegan in Tape #3.
I’M LOSING CONTROL OVER MY 256TH DEPOPULATION DAY TAPES POST.
::sips GrapheneOxideRedBullsugarfreecuzdontmixcarbsandcaffeine::
::calms down::
Of course you do!
Want more billionaire thought leader murder rationales?
Promo Code: Tim Truth
(2:17 video)
Day Tapes all here:
KNOW HOW PEOPLE RESPOND - MAKING THEM DO WHAT YOU WANT
Somewhere in the presentation he made two statements that I want to insert at this time. I don't remember just where they were made, but they're valid in terms of the general overall view.
One statement: "People can carry in their minds and act upon two contradictory ideas at one time, provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept far enough apart."
And the other statement is, "You can know pretty well how rational people are going to respond to certain circumstances or to certain information that they encounter. So, to determine the response you want you need only control the kind of data or information that they're presented or the kinds of circumstance that they're in; and being rational people they'll do what you want them to do. They may not fully understand what they're doing or why."
FALSIFIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting that some scientific research data could be - and indeed has been - falsified in order to bring about desired results. And here was said, "People don't ask the right questions. Some people are too trusting."
Now this was an interesting statement because the speaker and the audience all being doctors of medicine and supposedly very objectively, dispassionately scientific and science being the be all and end-all ... well to falsify scientific research data in that setting is like blasphemy in the church ... you just don't do that.
Anyhow, out of all of this was to come the New International Governing Body, probably to come through the U.N . and with a World Court, but not necessarily through those structures. It could be brought about in other ways. Acceptance of the U.N . at that time was seen as not being as wide as was hoped. Efforts would continue to give the United Nations increasing importance. People would be more and more used to the idea of relinquishing some national sovereignty.
So Kovid was falsified to get the shots in arms.
I believe that virology is largely falsified science and runs on proxy logics based on manufactured results kreated in byzantine processes that do provide predictable intended results.
I believe that PCR (not a) tests are also falsified and misused to create predictable results.
Modern medicine in general relies on proxy logics, diagnostics, and lots and lots of Big Pharm (Military Bioweapons) to control the population.
This post has a compilation of explorations.
Here are a few pulled out if they grab you.
👆You will find the Rockescorpion Grimy Fingerprints all over every aspect of this nightmare.
The shots are only one part of it but a significant part of it.
They are almost certainly going to double-tap you with the new cancer treatments and we already have an Ivermectin Mass Formation that is nicely done, Monsters. Well done, Mectinians.
Blue Pill Kovidians worshiping the “vaccines” have nothing on you guys!
Trot out a new stable of Recognized Experts and Trust zeeeeee Science.
Just please….KEEP TAKING THE HERD-CULLING DRUGS. INJECTIONS ARE THE BEST, BUT WHATEVS….JUST STAY ON THE MAILING LIST OF DRUGZ IN BODIEZ.
ALRIGHT, MY CAPS LOCK GOT STUCK AND NO THAT IS NOT A GRAMMATICAL ERROR BECAUSE SOMETIMES KOMPUTERS HAVE TWO SETS OF KAPS LOCKS AND I AM TROLLING YOU WITH K-S. K-TROLLING. THAT MADE NO SENSE AND I’M GOING TO TAKE A SIP OF SUGAR FREE RED BULL RIGHT NOW. I WILL NOW CHANNEL METH-POSTER MOSSAD AGENT PAF KLDSJF KLADSJFKLJ ADSKLFJADSKLJFK;LADSJFKL DSAJFKLADJSFKLVJSDFKJADKL;F JSDKLF JKALSD F JKLDSFJKLDSJFKADSJFKDSJFKL ASDJFKLDSJXTURMP
OKAY.
Caps lock are unstuck.
Let’s get back to that non-profit now.
The organization affirms that population growth has been the primary driver of environmental degradation and that the best way to promote environmentalism is to limit the growth of the earth’s population to a rate that causes no growth in the number of people. The organization promotes contraceptive use and abortions across the world and supports left-leaning policies regarding abortion, contraceptive use, and environmentalism and lobbies Congress through its affiliated organizations the Population Connection Action Fund and the Population Connection Action Fund PAC. 1
Population Connection has longstanding partnerships with left-leaning and pro-abortion organizations such as the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the National Organization for Women, and the American Civil Liberties Union to oppose restrictions to abortion at the state and federal level in the United States. 2
History
Population Connection was founded in 1968 as Zero Population Growth, a name it kept until a rebranding in 2002. The organization was founded by Paul Ehrlich, a professor at Stanford University. 3
The Population Bomb
At the time, Ehrlich had just released The Population Bomb, which predicted global catastrophe, mass starvation, and skyrocketing death rates by the end of the 20th century due to world population growth. Ehrlich coauthored the book with his wife Anne in just three weeks after being asked by David Brower, then-executive director of the Sierra Club, to write a book on population growth with the hopes on influencing the 1968 presidential elections. The book offered dire and alarmist predictions regarding the future of the environment, notably stating that in the 1970s, “hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death. No matter what people do, nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate.” 4
The Population Bomb, which is still cited by Population Connection as a seminal writing in the field of population research, was widely criticized from a variety of angles. 5 Critics including Sunita Narain, head of the Centre for Science and Environment in India, pointed out that Ehrlich’s criticism of New Delhi being an overcrowded slum, while in reality the population of the city was a fraction of that of Paris, was an unfair criticism more easily attributed to certain crowded areas, not actual overpopulation. 6
Even more criticized were the predictions that Ehrlich made in The Population Bomb and elsewhere in the late 1960s and early 1970s, such as when he predicted the collapse of human society and the largest mass death event in the history of the human race within fifteen years in a 1969 magazine article. 7
Ehrlich stated later that while he regretted framing what he claimed were simply scenarios as predictions about environmental disaster and mass starvation, he denied that none of his claims came true, citing famines in India, Cambodia, Bangladesh, and Africa. However, widely accepted starvation and death rate statistics indicated that there was no significant rise in the global death rate and that most starvation events were the result of war or bad governance rather than environmental degradation. 8
Smithsonian Magazine stated that Ehrlich’s dire claims along with the success of The Population Bomb, which became a best seller and sold millions of copies in the 1970s, led to a global panic with governments and international aid organizations instituting draconian contraceptive campaigns. The ensuing global population control campaign of the 1970s was called “horrific” by author Betsy Hartman, who wrote a 1987 exposé of the anti-population organizations titled Reproductive Rights and Wrongs. 9 Population control campaigns in poor nations led to the pressuring of women only to use approved contraceptive methods, paying healthcare workers by the number of intrauterine devices inserted into women, which invited abuse, and in Mexico, Bolivia, Peru, Indonesia and Bangladesh, millions of people were coercively sterilized, often in unsafe conditions. 10
Ehrlich rejects personal responsibility for alleged abuses in global population control campaigns, simply stating that while he strongly supported sterilization and vasectomy campaigns, he did not advocate for brutality and discrimination within the campaigns. 11
Early Years
The first basic mission of Population Connection (Zero Population Growth) was to stress the alleged link between the environment and population growth and urge Americans to have smaller families. This led to the organization to adopt the motto: “Stop at Two,”12 urging Americans to stop after having two children. Early efforts of the organization were aimed at the white middle class of America due to claims from Ehrlich and other founders of the organization that while there were more people living in developing nations, it was the white middle-class majority in America who consumed more resources and contributed more to environmental degradation. 13
Early efforts of the organization included handing out condoms with custom branding and opening vasectomy clinics. The organization also sponsored several college student groups, with one of the first being founded at Yale University. 14
Zero Population Growth was very active in supporting left-leaning abortion and contraceptive laws in the 1970s and cites the US Supreme Court’s decisions in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965 and Eisenstadt v. Baird in 1967 which allowed married and unmarried couples respectively the right to use contraceptives as vital to the organization’s U.S.-based efforts. The organization was supportive of rewriting the federal Comstock Laws of 1873, which Congress did in 1970 to declassify contraceptives as obscene. The organization began a longstanding relationship with several pro-abortion organizations such as the National Organization for Women, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the American Civil Liberties Union. The organization was an advocate of the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion as well as a companion decision, Doe v. Bolton, which legalized elective sterilization. 15
Just want to point out that Fucking Stanford is always fucking there.
Always. Fucking. There…
Stanford.
More Stanford.
👆I was a Sweet Summer Kirsch Child. Goddammmittt! 😹
Stanford!
Stanford!
Stanford!
Stanford!
Neuralinks!
Stanford! More Neuralinks!
Hillbilly Israel Puppets!
More Rogan guests!
😅
Okay, sorry, NO I’M NOT.
Those pesky Rockefellers!
Get ‘em Dissident Bobby Kennedy, Environmentalist!
Hey that’s Meryl Nass and Abby Rockefeller at Bobby’s party which the aforementioned Steve Kirsch funded the SuperPAC to launch and Kirsch was already hinting at Trump CLEANING UP THOSE DAMN AGENCIES in 2022…you know…IF TRUMP WERE TO BE RE-ELECTED (AND START WAR FOR ISRAEL WHICH WOULD TURN INTO A WORLD WAR WHICH IS ALSO STRAIGHT OUT OF THE DAY TAPES.)
Isn’t that odd?
Guess what I was looking into last night?
Bar Harbor, Maine.
Seems like they had a fire in 1947 and left a bunch of people homeless and stuff.
Seems like there is some kind of Billionaire’s Row along the coast and the Vandys and Rockys and…live there…and Jackson Labs Biomedical and Not so Kindly Grandmother and…
Okay goddammit there is not enough Sugar Free Graphene-Laced Red Bull on the Planet (“these people always refer to the world or the Earth as ‘the planet’”, said Lawrence Dunegan) to rescue this post.
I haz Brightness gift but sometimes it goes a little manic like Hal9000 in Kubrick Satan Movie #45.
That made no sense.
Let’s wrap this up.
Normie-friendly Gavin here to explain how ENVIRONMENTALISM was used to make an OSTENSIBLE REASON (Day Tapes!) for WE NEED TO KILL SOME FUCKING USELESS EATERS.
AFTER I FINISH THIS 12-PACK OF SUGAR FREE GRAPHENE-LACED RED BULL I AM NEVER DRINKING IT AGAIN.
BUY ME BRAZILIAN KOFI BEFORE THEY KILL ME.
NO, AGENT 149.7 I HAVE NOT TRIED MUSHROOM KOFI YET FRANKLY IT SOUNDS DISGUSTING.
I WILL DO BETTER NEXT TIME.
HEATHER!!!
thank you all and i can’t get my caps lock button to work now
This is a really good Substack.....Thanks....Pax :-)
I never tire of your repeating, reminding all of the Day Tapes.
That revelation was the lynchpin for my understanding of the real agenda for the world since the 1960s through "COVID" etc. Everything they're trying to do to us makes sense only in light of acknowledging those tapes.
Thank you. I fear a few in my circle remain with their heads in the sand, and still think I'm just a tinfoil-hat wearing (eek!) "conspiracy theorist".