Nuremberg 2.0: Where do you draw the line?
Nuremberg 2.0: Where do you draw the line?
Why do some get a pass in your justice framework, but others get sent to the firing squad?
Eric Topol
Aseem the Gleam
Dr. Warm Welcome
Hotez
Fauci
Dr. Drew
Bhattacharya
Trump
Rachel Maddow
Biden
Kathy Hochul
Krystal Ball
Keith Olbermann
Dean of Science Nergis Mavalvala
ACIP’s Grace Lee
Offit
Frances Collins
Don Lemon
Dr. Sanjay Douchebag
Neil Cavuto
Fill in your own names.
Media. Influencers. TV Docs. Pushers.
All of the above pushed the injections.
All of them.
The "Good Doctor" pushed so hard for the haccines... even when it was obvious that those were bad, he never apologized... His criticism is tepid at best, because the "Good Old Doctor" cares more about his ephemeral notoriety (thus his pocket) than the health and well-being of his viewers.
You could argue the same way that the doctor recommending you the jab is afraid of losing their license... so what could they do?!
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I really want to understand the Morality Flow Chart.
What lines are crossed and not crossed?
Is it just because you like them?
Is there any overriding “rule” in effect?
100% serious query and I challenge you to think seriously about your rationale.
It’s a surprisingly tough question as I consider it myself!
Yesterday, my wife and I had a very animated discussion about high-profile 'experts' who have recanted their previous pro-covid-vaccine stance, people like Dr Aseem Malhotra and 'Dr' John Campbell (as featured in your blog yesterday). My wife thought they should be congratulated and forgiven for changing their point of view of the shots. I maintained, however, that they should still be held accountable for using their public status to advocate in favour of vaccination, to the detriment of everyone who took the jab. My main point is that anyone with a medical or life science background, like our 2 'experts', should have seen through the huge problems associated with the vaccination campaign, which I'm sure I don't need to list here.
Anyone with a smattering of biological or medical knowledge, or any kind of acquaintance of how clinical trials are conducted, should have known the gene shots were a dangerous experiment to foist on humanity, and should have urged caution. They should have been aware of the very low COVID infection fatality rate for everyone under 60. They should have known that the disease was effectively zero risk for kids. This is the biggest crime in history, and those who are complicit need to be held to account.
Feel free to tackle the tough question:
What is the legal line that sends one off the cliff to their death?