April 3, 2020: "A collaborative study led by the Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute (BDI)... has shown that an anti-parasitic drug (IVM) kills the virus within 48 hours."
April 3, 2020: "A collaborative study led by the Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute (BDI)... has shown that an anti-parasitic drug (IVM) kills the virus within 48 hours."
"More than 200 strains of viruses that cause colds have been identified, which makes the development of appropriate immunization methods very difficult, if not impossible. For about 40% OF ALL COLDS, the responsible agents have not even been identified."
Biology (2nd Edition) 1989 Raven and Johnson page 576.
So many severe colds in the past... unknown agents... Never identified... Ever... Never...
Okay, given they have trouble identifying causitive viruses normally, there's hundreds of potential viruses to choose from, all NEVER before identified...
Think about this... How did they identify this one SO EARLY??? BY JANUARY 2020????
And determine what they found as the CAUSITIVE AGENT??
THE TIMELINE IS SO SUS...
I can understand they may identify the sequences and virus a few years later, but within days???
Come on...
"People don't ask the right questions"... (Day Tapes)
There's NO QUESTIONING up the chain as to the AUTHENTICITY of this Genebank delivered from CHINA, which was ISOLATED for Genebank SUPER EARLY in Jan 2020...
SO EARLY....
To deliver "known titers" of covid.. with which they'll TEST FOR RELIGIOUSLY using OVER AMPLIFIED PCR. How were these tell tale titers so well known in January 2020?
HOW??
Monash University isolated SARS Cov 2 from one patient only... Why is this so sus?
Two things:
1.) Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) WAS USED, which means that the Melbourne researchers "must have had the information from Chinese authorities" on the selections of primers... Really, they must have had the primers from the Chinese??
Neat trick to get the right primers to detect "covid" so early... What were these primers? The sequences are listed in the research notes, but yet again, thanks CHINA for supplying these sequences which we won't check or verify.
2.) ... Which really leads on from point 1.).... They detected and determined "covid" in Australia on Jan 24, 2020??!!!!
Seriously ONE SICK GUY, a SAMPLE from him yielded the elusive covid...
Wow...
Fortuitously all happened at Monash University ...
Where "Moderna's vaccine production factory will be based at Melbourne's Monash University under a 10-year deal inked with both state and federal governments."... according to government talking points in the media.
So sus that THIS IS THE PLACE to isolate covid in January 2020 isn't it?
Oh and they took a photo... Of a coronavirus...
Hmmmm ...
Could be ANY coronavirus to be honest, one of the known human coronaviruses, or any of the many wild coronaviruses that do not cause human illness... And of course around 40% of viruses that cause colds have never been identified... Never ... So how did they get this one so fast??
In fact it seems 99% of all earthly viruses have never been identified... Because earth is literally swimming in "viruses", every cubic metre of air is something like billions of viruses...
But we isolated this one so quick 🤔... Crapola ...
Not a bad explainer on viruses and just how many of these things are around...
late 14c., "poisonous substance" (a sense now archaic), from Latin virus "poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice," from Proto-Italic *weis-o-(s-) "poison," which is probably from a PIE root *ueis-, perhaps originally meaning "to melt away, to flow," used of foul or malodorous fluids, but with specialization in some languages to "poisonous fluid" (source also of Sanskrit visam "venom, poison," visah "poisonous;" Avestan vish- "poison;" Latin viscum "sticky substance, birdlime;" Greek ios "poison," ixos "mistletoe, birdlime;" Old Church Slavonic višnja "cherry;" Old Irish fi "poison;" Welsh gwy "poison").
Reminded me of why our nih fda etc said IVM or hcq(can't remember which now) threw shade on their own paper because it was only shown in vitro and of course you can't get that into the bloodstream at same concentration.
So they killed people by overdosing them and claimed it didn't work.
But the damn issue is staring us right in the face..,where did they get the damn virus to test in vitro?
Because they all claimed it was never isolated and they didn't have one
Are you recommending calf fetal tissue and peanut butter? If so, how does one prepare this mouth watering fusion of protein packed goodness... Sauteed? Or blended and moussed a la foie gras? A terrine? Please be specific, my 'million menu maladie mitigations' book is not just going to write itself... I might need AI.
I now think that Kaufman broke the taboo that all of the MDs know must not be broken: everything is political, nothing is scientific.
The problem is that most biomedical scientists are not MDs: they have never seen a patient and they really don't know anything. Because of their isolation from THAT PART OF THE REAL WORLD most scientists will never understand that everything in medicine is political, not scientific.
They are the crocodiles in the moat.
Therefore, viruses are real although we can never be sure of anything about anything and many other irrational ideas taught to them by the Monster's education system.
--
I think I read somewhere that Stefan Lanka was one of the first biologists who found bacteriophages, and then he said "Wait! This is wrong! Those are just products of the bacteria as they transform into another life stage" or something like that. That idea is heretical. There is no "transforming" or "transmutation" allowed in official science. Ever since, he has been a recovering virologist.
The cell culture thing is yes JJC’s IC’s. And yes probably not representing a wild whatever. Know what else is effective (perhaps more) against a whole variety of viruses in cell cultures? Dish soap.
It would be really neat if the Rock-scorpions have managed to coral everybody but everybody into taking fertility destroying pharmaceuticals such as IVM, on top of the junk food, tight nylon briefs, booze, fags, and all those chemicals in our shampoo, aftershave and plastic packaging. I would have to give them a big round of applause for that.
Although it would wipe out the highly lucrative condom and vasectomy businesses.
Me: We get to learn new scientific jargon every day on this stack! My (this) comment goes all over the place but is hopefully still readable and understandable. Personally I would call the Op a shell game with a side of semantic innuendos. Let me explain. I pull 3 shells out of my pocket and place them on the table. I put the germ labeled ball under one shell , the virus labeled ball under another shell and the cancer labeled ball under the third shell. I have just given credibility to the existence of a germ, a virus and a cancer by making a label for each ball that has that word on it. So I shuffle the 3 shells around and ask you to pick the shell that germ ball is under. You choose the one in the middle so I turn it over and find the virus ball so you lose because instead of germ we find virus. Well then the third shell must have cancer so we flip it over and, sure enough there is cancer. Now we know which shells have which disease under them and we can just keep playing the game as long as no one asks silly childish questions, like why or how did the conversation start with balls and end up with diseases, or these questions:
1.) Isn't the search for cancer really just looking for lumps? Are all lumps really that unusual and dangerous? Why do doctors give their observations Latin names and what is Latin for lump? Why are parasites always found near lumps or especially why are lumps so often full of parasites? Damn parasites always interfering with the cancer diagnosis! Parasites are legitimate pathogens and have no place in the PsyOp! They are too uncontrollable, uncooperative and easy to eliminate. Better that we spend a small fortune trying to prevent something that never existed to begin with in order to develop a solution that also doesn't exist which consumers will pay a lot for if we put it in a shiny package.
2.) So who has Dis-proven Stefan Lanka's research regarding possible proof that crystalline containers are created by cells to hold DNA pieces much like your computer's error log that leaves a record of memory at the time of a process failure? Who has proven that the crystalline structures are alive?
3.) My mom says that in colloquial medical related use 'germ' began as a slang in statements like this "I have been coughing - it must be or I must have a germ or the bug". Doctors have not, to my knowledge started using the Latin name for bug or germ but the definition has been made to look scientific like this:
germ /jûrm/
noun
Proper use as in germinate seeds which really do grow:
1.) A small mass of protoplasm or cells from which a new organism or one of its parts may develop. 2.) The earliest form of an organism; a seed, bud, or spore.
Not in Latin but microorganism has a kind of an "I'm smarter than you peons so I can use 'germ' to sell" ring to it and that's how science works - repackage and rebrand the poison. Only the best for you.
3.) A microorganism, especially a pathogen.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition
So there you have it. There is no proof of a pathogen called germ or a pathogen called virus or pathogen called cancer, as far as I can see. Dis-ease or Dis-comfort or Dis-like or Dis-this or Dis-that are all symptoms of an imbalance in the body which is actually a 21st century way of life. Poison in the air, poison in the water and poison in the food is the new nature or natural or norm. You just got to live with these poisonous changes because it is best for rich men's bank accounts. Everyone knows that money in the bank is more important than happiness and that you can always trust billionaires with your life.
Oh yeah, don't forget that germs, viruses and cancer are after you, like a cheetah running 60 miles per hour but thankfully we can head to our nearest hospital or doctor to get poisoned. This will kill the germ's, viruses and cancers after they finish eating us, leaving us with the satisfaction of knowing we have saved grandma. Well actually we won't be us at that point, would we? Never mind the facts because they just get in the way of science! Long live semantic games! We are in a battle of wits fighting unarmed opponents. 21st century change to blind leading the blind = billionaire liars and thieves paying stupid people to lie and steal.
Isolated, gratuitous math equation for non STEMs: (honesty + trust = stable relationship) while (deceit + Dis-trust = death). Do the math and see for yourself. *Dis-claimer* I am in no way promoting the idea that anyone spread deceit and Dis-trust to see if it leads to death. I am however promoting smart math and WIDE AWAKE problem solving. *end of Dis-claimer*.
smile big and make everyone wonder or ask "what are you up to?".
Haven’t dug into them yet but sure — a thing apparently generally able to suppress viral activity somehow probably could suppress whatever background activity you’re using to justify your pandemic. If thats whats really going on
Okay, pardon my slowness.... ::rubs sleeps from bleary eyes:: ... but I need remedial SH-ese.
I get that the concerns is fear porn messaging was used to get Tier Twos to direct the Hammers to mainline IVM. I get that.
I also understand that IVM has been fingered for reducing fertility in those who mainline it. (i.e. what I was was that you had to take a LOT... or for a long time... to see sperm mobility reduction or some shit)
Whatever Bill Gates(ofHell) was handing out to the Africans for most of the last half of the 20th century, it clearly didn't slow down their reproductive capacity in any noticeable fashion. (or at least not enough to make a dent in the crowding...)
So am I supposed to be all bent that IVM (which I tried for 2 days when the last round of toxic nastiness got me and which promptly - and I mean in 8-10hrs - put me right back on my feet) has somehow harmed my fertility after roughly 24mg of ingestion? Is this a cost benefit analysis?
Or is this more focused on the fact that they (the Tier Twos) are all spouting off about isolating ZEE KILLER VIRUS when many of us are coming to the realization that anyone who says that is giving an automatic tell that they're part of the Op?
How do they isolate viruses exactly? Jon Rappoport, a well-known investigative reporter in the medical industry, who wrote the book "Aids Inc.", says there is no proof viruses even exist. His website is No More Fake News.
To me, it all revolves around money, millions and billions and zillions of dollars, enough to line the pockets and fill the bank accounts of all the inept bogus researchers worldwide. Just be part of planning the plandemic, and have a patent on something that has a sciency name, and claim it's the end all cure all.
But be sure it's not called Ivermectin, or Fenbendazole; those are too cheap and no zillions can be generated by them, even though they actually ARE safe and effective, unlike ANY vaxxxine ever made.
I'm going to stick with my 532nm green vortex laser. Of course Chelation.
I tell ya ivermectin makes you feel better, till you stop taking it. Plus it mutates your sperm. Found that out back in 2015. Oregano oil works much better, melts the plastic right outta ya, the lipid nano is really plastic nano.
Pew, pew, pew. 532nm green laser topical disassembly technique.
Promptly New Zealand health tyrants have now banned 532nm green lasers.
I never shared this guy's silliness but here it is now......
Combined Early Treatment of Dewormer, Combined with Antihistamine, Expectorant and SSRI Shows Major Clinical Efficacy Against Serious Illness From COVID19
Amazing, it only took 3 years.
"I dedicate this article to Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. David Brownstein, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marek, Dr. Didier Raoult, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who were among the true first visionaries who saw it as never-an-option to do anything but treat sick patients. I also dedicate it to the physicians who have stood firm against the ignorance-inducing effects of the enforcement of non-extant standards of care against the 21st Cures Act, which requires that physicians pay heed to real-world evidence on COVID19 outcomes."
I forgot to include the Pierre Kory Fox News DECEMBER, 2020 video clip where he says flat out if you take IVM you will NOT GET COVID.
But this was too long anyway.
Reminded me of Joe Biden saying, "You're not gonna get Covid...if you get vaccinated."
Errybody got a hero and a hero drug. And they all protect the Dangerous Germs EMERGENCY paradigm.
Every last one of them.
"More than 200 strains of viruses that cause colds have been identified, which makes the development of appropriate immunization methods very difficult, if not impossible. For about 40% OF ALL COLDS, the responsible agents have not even been identified."
Biology (2nd Edition) 1989 Raven and Johnson page 576.
So many severe colds in the past... unknown agents... Never identified... Ever... Never...
Okay, given they have trouble identifying causitive viruses normally, there's hundreds of potential viruses to choose from, all NEVER before identified...
Think about this... How did they identify this one SO EARLY??? BY JANUARY 2020????
And determine what they found as the CAUSITIVE AGENT??
THE TIMELINE IS SO SUS...
I can understand they may identify the sequences and virus a few years later, but within days???
Come on...
"People don't ask the right questions"... (Day Tapes)
There's NO QUESTIONING up the chain as to the AUTHENTICITY of this Genebank delivered from CHINA, which was ISOLATED for Genebank SUPER EARLY in Jan 2020...
SO EARLY....
To deliver "known titers" of covid.. with which they'll TEST FOR RELIGIOUSLY using OVER AMPLIFIED PCR. How were these tell tale titers so well known in January 2020?
HOW??
Monash University isolated SARS Cov 2 from one patient only... Why is this so sus?
Two things:
1.) Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) WAS USED, which means that the Melbourne researchers "must have had the information from Chinese authorities" on the selections of primers... Really, they must have had the primers from the Chinese??
Neat trick to get the right primers to detect "covid" so early... What were these primers? The sequences are listed in the research notes, but yet again, thanks CHINA for supplying these sequences which we won't check or verify.
2.) ... Which really leads on from point 1.).... They detected and determined "covid" in Australia on Jan 24, 2020??!!!!
Seriously ONE SICK GUY, a SAMPLE from him yielded the elusive covid...
Wow...
Fortuitously all happened at Monash University ...
Where "Moderna's vaccine production factory will be based at Melbourne's Monash University under a 10-year deal inked with both state and federal governments."... according to government talking points in the media.
So sus that THIS IS THE PLACE to isolate covid in January 2020 isn't it?
Oh and they took a photo... Of a coronavirus...
Hmmmm ...
Could be ANY coronavirus to be honest, one of the known human coronaviruses, or any of the many wild coronaviruses that do not cause human illness... And of course around 40% of viruses that cause colds have never been identified... Never ... So how did they get this one so fast??
https://open.substack.com/pub/geoffpain/p/first-detected-covid19-case-arrived?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tymb5
In fact it seems 99% of all earthly viruses have never been identified... Because earth is literally swimming in "viruses", every cubic metre of air is something like billions of viruses...
But we isolated this one so quick 🤔... Crapola ...
Not a bad explainer on viruses and just how many of these things are around...
https://youtu.be/Of6BRUWXdUg?si=319hBMd-DeyzvBcP
Do words have power?
virus (n.)
late 14c., "poisonous substance" (a sense now archaic), from Latin virus "poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice," from Proto-Italic *weis-o-(s-) "poison," which is probably from a PIE root *ueis-, perhaps originally meaning "to melt away, to flow," used of foul or malodorous fluids, but with specialization in some languages to "poisonous fluid" (source also of Sanskrit visam "venom, poison," visah "poisonous;" Avestan vish- "poison;" Latin viscum "sticky substance, birdlime;" Greek ios "poison," ixos "mistletoe, birdlime;" Old Church Slavonic višnja "cherry;" Old Irish fi "poison;" Welsh gwy "poison").
Reminded me of why our nih fda etc said IVM or hcq(can't remember which now) threw shade on their own paper because it was only shown in vitro and of course you can't get that into the bloodstream at same concentration.
So they killed people by overdosing them and claimed it didn't work.
But the damn issue is staring us right in the face..,where did they get the damn virus to test in vitro?
Because they all claimed it was never isolated and they didn't have one
Are you recommending calf fetal tissue and peanut butter? If so, how does one prepare this mouth watering fusion of protein packed goodness... Sauteed? Or blended and moussed a la foie gras? A terrine? Please be specific, my 'million menu maladie mitigations' book is not just going to write itself... I might need AI.
I now think that Kaufman broke the taboo that all of the MDs know must not be broken: everything is political, nothing is scientific.
The problem is that most biomedical scientists are not MDs: they have never seen a patient and they really don't know anything. Because of their isolation from THAT PART OF THE REAL WORLD most scientists will never understand that everything in medicine is political, not scientific.
They are the crocodiles in the moat.
Therefore, viruses are real although we can never be sure of anything about anything and many other irrational ideas taught to them by the Monster's education system.
--
I think I read somewhere that Stefan Lanka was one of the first biologists who found bacteriophages, and then he said "Wait! This is wrong! Those are just products of the bacteria as they transform into another life stage" or something like that. That idea is heretical. There is no "transforming" or "transmutation" allowed in official science. Ever since, he has been a recovering virologist.
He wanted to be a croc no more.
The cell culture thing is yes JJC’s IC’s. And yes probably not representing a wild whatever. Know what else is effective (perhaps more) against a whole variety of viruses in cell cultures? Dish soap.
It would be really neat if the Rock-scorpions have managed to coral everybody but everybody into taking fertility destroying pharmaceuticals such as IVM, on top of the junk food, tight nylon briefs, booze, fags, and all those chemicals in our shampoo, aftershave and plastic packaging. I would have to give them a big round of applause for that.
Although it would wipe out the highly lucrative condom and vasectomy businesses.
SH: There is mass SHITFUCKERY going on.
Me: We get to learn new scientific jargon every day on this stack! My (this) comment goes all over the place but is hopefully still readable and understandable. Personally I would call the Op a shell game with a side of semantic innuendos. Let me explain. I pull 3 shells out of my pocket and place them on the table. I put the germ labeled ball under one shell , the virus labeled ball under another shell and the cancer labeled ball under the third shell. I have just given credibility to the existence of a germ, a virus and a cancer by making a label for each ball that has that word on it. So I shuffle the 3 shells around and ask you to pick the shell that germ ball is under. You choose the one in the middle so I turn it over and find the virus ball so you lose because instead of germ we find virus. Well then the third shell must have cancer so we flip it over and, sure enough there is cancer. Now we know which shells have which disease under them and we can just keep playing the game as long as no one asks silly childish questions, like why or how did the conversation start with balls and end up with diseases, or these questions:
1.) Isn't the search for cancer really just looking for lumps? Are all lumps really that unusual and dangerous? Why do doctors give their observations Latin names and what is Latin for lump? Why are parasites always found near lumps or especially why are lumps so often full of parasites? Damn parasites always interfering with the cancer diagnosis! Parasites are legitimate pathogens and have no place in the PsyOp! They are too uncontrollable, uncooperative and easy to eliminate. Better that we spend a small fortune trying to prevent something that never existed to begin with in order to develop a solution that also doesn't exist which consumers will pay a lot for if we put it in a shiny package.
2.) So who has Dis-proven Stefan Lanka's research regarding possible proof that crystalline containers are created by cells to hold DNA pieces much like your computer's error log that leaves a record of memory at the time of a process failure? Who has proven that the crystalline structures are alive?
3.) My mom says that in colloquial medical related use 'germ' began as a slang in statements like this "I have been coughing - it must be or I must have a germ or the bug". Doctors have not, to my knowledge started using the Latin name for bug or germ but the definition has been made to look scientific like this:
germ /jûrm/
noun
Proper use as in germinate seeds which really do grow:
1.) A small mass of protoplasm or cells from which a new organism or one of its parts may develop. 2.) The earliest form of an organism; a seed, bud, or spore.
Not in Latin but microorganism has a kind of an "I'm smarter than you peons so I can use 'germ' to sell" ring to it and that's how science works - repackage and rebrand the poison. Only the best for you.
3.) A microorganism, especially a pathogen.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition
So there you have it. There is no proof of a pathogen called germ or a pathogen called virus or pathogen called cancer, as far as I can see. Dis-ease or Dis-comfort or Dis-like or Dis-this or Dis-that are all symptoms of an imbalance in the body which is actually a 21st century way of life. Poison in the air, poison in the water and poison in the food is the new nature or natural or norm. You just got to live with these poisonous changes because it is best for rich men's bank accounts. Everyone knows that money in the bank is more important than happiness and that you can always trust billionaires with your life.
Oh yeah, don't forget that germs, viruses and cancer are after you, like a cheetah running 60 miles per hour but thankfully we can head to our nearest hospital or doctor to get poisoned. This will kill the germ's, viruses and cancers after they finish eating us, leaving us with the satisfaction of knowing we have saved grandma. Well actually we won't be us at that point, would we? Never mind the facts because they just get in the way of science! Long live semantic games! We are in a battle of wits fighting unarmed opponents. 21st century change to blind leading the blind = billionaire liars and thieves paying stupid people to lie and steal.
Isolated, gratuitous math equation for non STEMs: (honesty + trust = stable relationship) while (deceit + Dis-trust = death). Do the math and see for yourself. *Dis-claimer* I am in no way promoting the idea that anyone spread deceit and Dis-trust to see if it leads to death. I am however promoting smart math and WIDE AWAKE problem solving. *end of Dis-claimer*.
smile big and make everyone wonder or ask "what are you up to?".
Whoa. I first read their title as "Monarch" Biomedicine Discovery Institute.
I think I've been predictively programmed by alt media.
Just chasing down refs from this Wagstaff person:
Huh — 2012 Ivm against HIV and Dengue:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417684/
Sep. 2020 review, swiss army knife drug: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417684/
This is the ref for the 48 hr study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32251768/
Haven’t dug into them yet but sure — a thing apparently generally able to suppress viral activity somehow probably could suppress whatever background activity you’re using to justify your pandemic. If thats whats really going on
Okay, pardon my slowness.... ::rubs sleeps from bleary eyes:: ... but I need remedial SH-ese.
I get that the concerns is fear porn messaging was used to get Tier Twos to direct the Hammers to mainline IVM. I get that.
I also understand that IVM has been fingered for reducing fertility in those who mainline it. (i.e. what I was was that you had to take a LOT... or for a long time... to see sperm mobility reduction or some shit)
Whatever Bill Gates(ofHell) was handing out to the Africans for most of the last half of the 20th century, it clearly didn't slow down their reproductive capacity in any noticeable fashion. (or at least not enough to make a dent in the crowding...)
So am I supposed to be all bent that IVM (which I tried for 2 days when the last round of toxic nastiness got me and which promptly - and I mean in 8-10hrs - put me right back on my feet) has somehow harmed my fertility after roughly 24mg of ingestion? Is this a cost benefit analysis?
Or is this more focused on the fact that they (the Tier Twos) are all spouting off about isolating ZEE KILLER VIRUS when many of us are coming to the realization that anyone who says that is giving an automatic tell that they're part of the Op?
How do they isolate viruses exactly? Jon Rappoport, a well-known investigative reporter in the medical industry, who wrote the book "Aids Inc.", says there is no proof viruses even exist. His website is No More Fake News.
To me, it all revolves around money, millions and billions and zillions of dollars, enough to line the pockets and fill the bank accounts of all the inept bogus researchers worldwide. Just be part of planning the plandemic, and have a patent on something that has a sciency name, and claim it's the end all cure all.
But be sure it's not called Ivermectin, or Fenbendazole; those are too cheap and no zillions can be generated by them, even though they actually ARE safe and effective, unlike ANY vaxxxine ever made.
Anthony Colpo just wrote up some fine questions for🐴 regarding the questionable timeline, his affiliations, and personal choices...
He emailed them to both available contact addresses. Not holding my breath for a response...
Pew, pew, pew (that star wars laser sound effect) pew, pew ,pew.
I'm going to stick with my 532nm green vortex laser. Of course Chelation.
I tell ya ivermectin makes you feel better, till you stop taking it. Plus it mutates your sperm. Found that out back in 2015. Oregano oil works much better, melts the plastic right outta ya, the lipid nano is really plastic nano.
Pew, pew, pew. 532nm green laser topical disassembly technique.
Promptly New Zealand health tyrants have now banned 532nm green lasers.
https://sam368.substack.com/p/photoresponsive-hydrogels-cracked?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I never shared this guy's silliness but here it is now......
Combined Early Treatment of Dewormer, Combined with Antihistamine, Expectorant and SSRI Shows Major Clinical Efficacy Against Serious Illness From COVID19
Amazing, it only took 3 years.
"I dedicate this article to Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. David Brownstein, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marek, Dr. Didier Raoult, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who were among the true first visionaries who saw it as never-an-option to do anything but treat sick patients. I also dedicate it to the physicians who have stood firm against the ignorance-inducing effects of the enforcement of non-extant standards of care against the 21st Cures Act, which requires that physicians pay heed to real-world evidence on COVID19 outcomes."
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/combined-early-treatment-of-dewormer