Like the one model that a Brit cooked up that formed the basis for this entire doom scenario.
Do you see the cover that offloading decisions to the machines provides? You can apply this to every space that AI is being used. AI is only as good as its code and learning. Bias present in the programmer will result in bias in the generated information. It doesn’t matter if it was intentional or not, but it will be intentional. They’ll want to hold these systems up as all knowing and impartial. They want a ‘rational’ excuse to slaughter.
So, viruses are questionable. Alt med is questionable. PCR is questionable. Science is questionable. Death stats and records are questionable. Basically all of the superstructure of the pandemic, as well as the minutia is questionable. Is the whole thing kabuki top to bottom? A hall of mirrors?
I know about a dozen people dead over the past four years. And many more with damage of some kind. Some very damaged. That’s it. That’s all I ‘know’ for sure.
I think a lot of times the “isolate a virus” question is set up as a straw man as a basis for religious fundamentalism on either side. I suspect for answering the “how do these things work” or “what is really going on” questions, isolating a virus makes as much as isolating a lung to study human behavior. Pretty sure the correct answer to most of these questions is “we really have no idea”
Questions about the video: If you have to isolate the virus to identify it, but you can't yet do that adequately, doesn't that mean that you can't demonstrate that the virus caused an epidemic? This doesn't mean there aren't viruses. And it doesn't mean that there are viruses. I'm neutral on that question. (It's the old "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" but also doesn't rule it in)
The 3 questions in the video are very simple and should be answerable by science. If they can't be, what does that imply?
If you can't demonstrate that, then how might you justify the shutdowns, mandates, "shots", hospital murders, etc.?
This whole story doesn't hold together too well.
Extra credit question: How did flu disappear the moment "covid19" showed up?
What they call viruses could be any number of things caused by starvation of cells and the addition of various toxic substances such as antibiotics and antifungals, that cause the already abnormal cell lines to react and die.
These "experiments" use all sorts of tricks to obtain the desired results. For example they used Vero E6 cells derived from the kidneys of African green monkeys; human hepatocyte cell lines taken from a liver tumour in 1982 and subsequently cultured; and human HeLa cells derived from a female human in 1951 suffering from cervical carcinoma and subsequently cultured.
To the cell lines they add inorganic salts, foetal bovine serum to feed the cells, and an array of cytotoxic items such amphotericin B – an anti-fungal, trypsin, penicillin – an antibiotic, streptomycin – another antibiotic, glutaraldehyde, which produces exosomes from the cell culture that are indistinguishable from the short strands from the host’s lung fluid – a disinfectant, and osmium tetroxide – an acutely toxic oxidising agent, and epoxy resin– to create a solid substrate for ultra-thin slicing.
Could also simply be nano-particles in and around culture cells which resulted from the laboratory experiments themselves or millions of unique genetic fragments from the sample, innumerable microbes, even from the air a subject breathed.
In one of the SARS-CoV-2 experiments often cited they were unable to find “virions” with the purported spike protein, so they added more trypsin to the cell culture medium, and the trypsin, the function of which is to digest proteins, had corroded the outer protein layer of the alleged “virion” which showed the characteristic crown-like fringe of "spike proteins”, which, they draw some arrows on in the artists rendition color it purple and tell everyone how deadly it is.
There is nothing legitimate about any of this.
Nowadays most of these images are nothing more than computer generated images representing an artist’s impression.
For clarification there is no such thing as "no virus" people these are individuals that are demanding scientific proof based on proper scientific methodologies.
Genomic sequencing and the entirety of gene theory is also quack science.
Addendum: Why The Establishment of the "health freedom movement" (the dissenters already have formed an Establishment- say what?!) are so bothered by such scientific inquiry and use the EXACT same techniques of dismissal and derision as is used against them by the mainstream political and scientific establishment seems to escape their awareness. I think that's called hypocrisy and is quite a red flag.
More than ever, it is critical that we understand the distinction between real scientific research and the fraud that has all but taken over our scientific literature.
In this series, Dr. Judy walks you through the important topics from all three books that should have ended these plandemics before they began and which was covered in her science paper published in 2009!
Join her in this interactive program to gain a deeper understanding of the ethical dilemmas that researchers face, and the complex relationship between science and public health policy.
Another telling fact: these “pandemic” articles were never big front-page stories—they were buried next to church news and the latest sales of eyeglasses.
According to a 1920 Harvard historical document, 5000 people in Boston died from the Pandemic of 1918, and the same article reported that Boston was the third largest city death count in America.[3] This fact also leads one to again question the death count of 500,000 in the US. It also explains the curious fact that no one in my family mentioned this purportedly horrific disease event. My grandparents and great uncles and aunts, who were alive and working in 1918, never discussed a pandemic or even any big disease outbreak. My grandfather was a barnyard musician and great story teller who told me family tales about everything-- Great Aunt Delia falling into the cistern, the problems of using a clevis pin in 20 below zero weather to hook the T-bar to the horse drawn wagon--but not one peep about the Great Pandemic of 1918. Although it would have occurred in the prime of his young adulthood, the “Great Pandemic” apparently was not a major event in his life. In his diary which he faithfully kept daily from 1893 to 1963 there is one entry in 1918 that some relative “got the flu”. No further mention of death or disability—and he faithfully recorded these events over the years. My father was 13 years old at the time of the pandemic. He discussed with me that he had osteomyelitis -- an infection of his tibia that resulted in his being bedridden for months when he was around 10 years old. This should have focused his attention on the issue of disease and recovery. But he never mentioned “the pandemic”. As an adult, he earned his MD, DDS and a PhD in biochemistry, taught Dentistry at Harvard, did research, practiced medicine, and was generally a student of 20th century history—but a “pandemic” was not on his radar. I recently spoke to a group of about 350 people, and simply asked anyone to tell me afterward if they had ever heard family talk about the loss of members in the “Pandemic” of 1918. Only one person told me that her family passed down a story, but when she investigated it, the person had actually died years before the outbreak.
Why the pandemic was called the Spanish flu is unclear. The disease did not start in Spain, but rather, around Fort Riley Kansas which was a training base for the First World War. Army recruits at the base were becoming ill, and many were dying of a strange pulmonic disorder associated with fever, severe fatigue, and bloody discharge. We have numerous sources of direct history of the event—memory books that were written by families, the diary and later books of Dr. Eleanora McBean who volunteered with her family to provide care to the recruits, the autopsy results of Colonel William Welch and pathologists from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, pharmaceutical history, Kansas historical Archives, Nany and Public Health Service Archives, and numerous other eyewitness accounts. Unlike today, the US Public Health Service made an honest attempt to understand transmission of the illness. They enlisted volunteers who leaned over the dying without touching them, putting their mouths close to the mouths of the sick, and breathing in their exhalations. The volunteers did not become ill. Then, they had sick and dying people cough on the volunteers. They swabbed mucus and nasal secretions from the sick and stuffed it into the noses and throats of the well. In the days before antibiotics, they even spun down the secretions of the dying and injected this solution into the well volunteers. But no matter what they did, they could not transfer this new disease to the healthy volunteers. In actual numbers, zero out of 118 well volunteers became sick. From the Navy Archives, “The volunteers were repeatedly exposed to hospital patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms in an attempt to make them contract the disease. Although the 118 men failed to develop influenza, they all received full pardons in recognition of their participation.”[4] (This tells you the “volunteers” were actually not so voluntary—probably being in the brig at the time.)
Curiously, horses were also affected with this respiratory disease, so they tried to prove transmission in horses. They moved feed bags from the snout of a sick horse to a healthy horse. No healthy horse became sick. They tried to find a bacillus that accounted for the disease but could not find bacilli that were not also found in the well. In spite of all this, at the end of time, they just could not give up the notion of person-to-person transmission, (or like today they were being incentivized and/or coerced by the pharmaceutical companies). The reluctant conclusion of the Public Health Service researchers at the time was this (reproduced with the original bold and capitalized emphasis):
“The results of these experiments indicate PRESUMPTIVELY that influenza MAY be transmitted by means of the secretions of the upper respiratory passages from patients in the early stages of this disease, probably within less than 12 hours from onset. VERY DEFINITE CONCLUSIONS CAN NOT BE DRAWN…These conclusions, however, contradict the specific results of each of the three series of experiments reported within the document, where we find that NONE of the volunteer soldiers exposed to the fluids of patients with symptoms of Spanish Flu contracted the Spanish Flu symptoms.”[5]
Dr. William Welch and a team of AFIP Pathologists, bravely undertook to autopsy the dead. (This should be the first line of inquiry in any new “disease” but was actually prohibited by the medical authorities in the age of COVID.). Caretakers of the dying, in 1918, had observed that young men would develop fever and cough, then suddenly would cough up blood and die. The autopsies of the troops revealed that many of them had lungs filled with blood. Some were “consolidated” or edematous and bacteria were consistently found. But the pathologists could not understand how “bacterial pneumonia” would act so differently in 1918 than any previous encounters. A review was done 100 years later by researcher Zon-Mei Sheng et al., who reviewed paraffin tissue blocks from Army personnel who had died of the disease. “All 68 cases had histological evidence of bacterial pneumonia, and 94% showed abundant bacteria on Gram stain.”
May 25, 1917, an Army Medical School had been established at Ft. Riley, Kansas.
October, 1917, 525 cases of Typhoid Fever occurred in Kansas and the State Board of Health gives 9,000 “free shots” in response to 525 cases of Typhoid Fever in Kansas.
October and November, 1917, Meningitis breaks out and a second round of vaccines—this time for Meningitis was given.
In January and February of 2018, Military recruits, and school children, , were required to have a variety of crude vaccines partially concocted at the time of inoculation. Although I cannot prove this in the news, it is likely that—as is true today—the Indian Health Service pushed vaccination on the Native Americans.
One month later, in March of 1918, Scarlet Fever epidemics were reported from Cowley, Butler, Dickinson and Leavenworth counties.
Also in March 1918, five students at the (Native American) Haskell Institute 95 miles from Ft. Riley had died and 457 were ill with a disease called “strep-grip.”
In September 1918, the disease still was not front-page news. Throughout this time, there were more concerns over wheat shortages, Anti-German discrimination, and conscientious objectors to the war. The Kansas City Star reported that Mrs. James Farrell, Effingham, was the knitting champion of Atchison County. She had knitted 100 pairs of socks for the Red Cross since August, 1917.
In October, 1918, three hundred cases of what was now being called “Influenza” was being reported in the state. Hays was hardest hit with 200 cases yet still reported only several deaths. By the middle of October, 1918, Kansas Governor Capper issued a state-wide closing order, effective for one week, in an effort to halt the flu epidemic. Over 7,000 cases had been reported statewide. Even accounting for underreporting this does not suggest a pandemic of epic proportion. Also on October 25, 1918, my grandfather recorded in his diary that relatives arrived from Canada and a few days later the town of 1200 people was put on quarantine.
2 November, 1918, The State Board of Health in Kansas lifted the influenza closing order.
This graph shows the very acute time course of influenza deaths in 1918, beginning about 6 months after the vaccinations took place, and going away three months later—never to return.
From: Sheng, ZM, Chertow, DS, Ambroggio, X et al,
Although we have seasonal illness we call Influenza, and occasionally Influenza breaks out worldwide as it has done for centuries, never since 1918 have we seen this unusually lethal type of outbreak until 2019 and the COVID “Pandemic”. What is discounted, forgotten, or purposely ignored are the observations of Dr. Eleanora McBean who actually witnessed the outbreak at Ft. Riley, Kansas, and as a child helped her family care for sick soldiers and community members. Writing later, as a physician, she reported that the only deaths were in the vaccinated. Her family was exposed to diseased people daily, along with others who volunteered to care for the sick. They were unvaccinated and as people were dying around them, according to Dr. McBean they “didn’t even get the sniffles”.
Most of the historical search for this article focused on Kansas because it is generally cited as ground zero for the “Great Pandemic”. Looking about America, the disease disproportionately hit cities, and concentrations of military or other people living together in dormitories or Indian Reservations. These people were mandated to have vaccines, or were likely to have been told by their local authorities to do so. Neither the numbers cited by any individual city or locale, nor by the counties seem to add to the gross numbers we hear today. It is apparent that in a few places, an unusual number of folks became unusually ill. These places—such as Fort Riley and Boston generated a mythos that was remembered by the medical establishment more than the public at large.
People who developed neurasthenia, in the absence of vaccination, could become symptomatic, but did not develop the severe pulmonary symptoms and were found in some studies to live longer than average. But propaganda seems to have been deployed consciously via the newspapers from 1920 to today regarding the causes of the disease of 1918.
Looking at the totality of the evidence, the Pandemic of 1918 was not probably a communicable disease, but a disease of communicable technologies. Americans went to Europe and we took our Telegram equipment and vaccines with us for sale on the European market. When the soldiers were returning home, the public was convinced through aggressive marketing campaigns to get vaccinated because the troops were returning from Europe with “Disease”. The vaccine timing explains the huge spike of disease and death during a narrow time range following a rapid multiple vaccination rollout. The later prolonged, less dramatic occurrences of death followed a more sluggish civilian adoption of the vaccine program.
The Pandemic of 1918 as the prototype of infectious transmissible worldwide disease is based on skewed history, propaganda, and assumptions, not proof. This underscores the need today for true systematic scientific inquiry where we examine the basics and the basis of our views of biology and disease--not just an “Epidemiologic” mapping of sick people, coupled with preconceived notions. In fact, it is difficult not to wonder about the role of the Rockefeller Institute under Gates Senior orchestrating this whole show. Given the physicians and scientists who have unexpectedly died in the 20th century, such as famous cancer researcher Dr. Mary Sherman of SV-40 fame, it is worth mention that Dr. Frederick Gates, after the war, and after his father was deceased, moved to Harvard where he died young from a blow to the head. In less polite circles that might be suspected as “cutting the trail”.
The biology/physiology of this effect is at least partly understood. Metabolism depends on an electron transfer chain within the mitochondria—intracellular organelles which take the results of metabolism and convert it energy within each living cell. The flow of electrons can be altered with the application of a sudden electromagnetic field. Additionally, the rate at which the EMF is introduced matters. In medicine, we once were taught “Cannon’s Law of the Body” that the body responds to rate of change not just absolutes. We are physiologically better able to adapt to a new environment if it is applied slowly. So, in the 1918 Ft. Riley outbreak, some recruits—not previously exposed to electricity-- were suddenly surrounded by miles of copper wire transmitting signals that were typed out at discordant 7.2 Hz frequency, just shy of the natural Schumann earth resonance of 7.83 Hz. It was observed by doctors stationed at the army camps during the autumn 1918 wave of influenza, that those young men who were dying, more often than not, big, were the big brawny country boys, not the pale, scrawny city boys. This makes sense when you consider that the city kids had already been slowly adapted to the electrification of their cities. [12]
Prior to 1900, medical studies of Telegrapher’s disease and Neurasthenia actually showed that people may have had a miserable anxiety ridden existence, but it did not shorten their life span—in fact life span may have been slightly extended. So, what accounted for the sudden mass death in the camp? There were at least two other factors contributing to the Pandemic death count that are very reminiscent of COVID deaths today.
In 1918, The Bayer Company, a subsidiary of IG Farben, had just lost their patent on Aspirin, a drug that German scientists accidentally discovered lowered fever. So, the company waged a PR campaign to convince doctors via the AMA and the newly organized medical education establishment that lowering temperature with Aspirin, was a great idea for recovery from disease! Today, we have considerable data from India on the treatment of Tuberculosis and Polio, that fever is beneficial to resolving disease. Lowering temperature by chemical means extended the active phase of disease and resulted in more paralysis and increased mortality. But that information was not available in 1918, (and still ignored by most physicians today).
Nor did physicians of 1918 understand the risk of bleeding with higher dosing of Aspirin. Diarists of the pandemic report seeing doctors giving handfuls of aspirin to reduce the fever in recruits. And, in confirmation, it was noted by physicians in 1918 that as the disease progressed, victims began bleeding from the nose, and mouth. Many deaths subsequently occurred with hemorrhagic lungs—lungs filled with blood, not pus.
Finally, and probably the most damaging, yet debated, factor was this: WWI was the first conflict in which our military were given multiple (and experimental) vaccines.
Dr. Frederick L. Gates was from not one but multiple Ivy League Schools, beginning at the U. of Chicago and transferring to Yale where he was awarded the Andrew D. White award.(White was a member of the Order of Skull and Bones). Gates subsequently graduated with honors from Johns Hopkins Medical School in 1913, and in 1917 when America entered the war, volunteered for the Army Medical Corps. He was commissioned as a First Lieutenant. Surprisingly, for a newly minted medical officer, Gates was assigned to duty on the Rockefeller Institute staff, likely due to his father Frederick Taylor Gates being a personal assistant to John D. Rockefeller.
Gates the elder is credited with Rockefeller’s getting involved in organized medicine. “ Although Rockefeller himself believed in folk medicine, the billionaire listened to his experts, and Gates convinced him that he could have the greatest impact by modernizing medicine especially by reforming education, sponsoring research to identify cures, and systematically eradicating debilitating diseases that sapped national efficiency like hookworm…In 1901, Gates Senior designed the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University), of which he was board president. He then designed the Rockefeller Foundation, becoming a trustee upon its creation in 1913.” [13]
According to his memorial biography, Dr. Frederick L. Gates “gave lectures to military groups (at the Rockefeller Institute) … was also assigned to visit training camps, in the interest of preventive medicine, and traveled widely”. What they don’t mention is his role as primary investigator on the vaccinations given at Ft. Riley, Kansas prior to the outbreak of disease.
On May 25, 1917 an Army Medical School had been established at Ft. Riley, Kansas. Shortly thereafter, in October 1917, 525 cases of Typhoid Fever occurred in Kansas, and the State Board of Health gave 9,000 “free shots”.[14] Three months later, an outbreak of “meningitis” occurred. The US Navy and Army estimated that 40 percent and 36 percent of their servicemen had been affected.[15] (It is important to note that an “outbreak” of meningitis usually involves one or two people. The largest outbreaks in the last 50 years I could identify were groups of gay men in San Francisco and LA with 20-30 cases. To have over 30% of personnel affected is totally outside the norm for reported outbreaks of meningitis.) The response again was to administer more crude home-made meningitis vaccines, beginning in January 1918 and continuing into February 1918.
From the Kansas historical society records:
“Following an outbreak of epidemic meningitis at Camp Funston, Kansas, in October and November, 1917, a series of anti-meningitis vaccinations was undertaken on volunteer subjects from the camp. Major E. H. Schorer, Chief of the Laboratory Section at the adjacent Base Hospital at Fort Riley, offered every facility at his command and cooperated in the laboratory work connected with the vaccinations… In the camp, under the direction of the Division Surgeon, Lieutenant Colonel J. L. Shepard, a preliminary series of vaccinations on a relatively small number of volunteers served to determine the appropriate doses and the resultant local and general reactions. Following this series, the vaccine was offered by the Division Surgeon to the camp at large, and "given by the regimental surgeons to all who wished to take it.”
This excerpt from Dr. Gates’ paper on the research submitted for publication in 1918 gives you a flavor of the state of vaccination art and his involvement at that time:
“The vaccine used was made in the laboratory of The Rockefeller Institute. 16-hour growths on 1 per cent glucose agar in Blake bottles were washed off with isotonic salt solution, like strains pooled, and the concentrated suspensions immediately heated to 65°C. for 30 minutes to kill the cocci and inactivate the autolytic ferment…Accordingly, the vaccinations were begun with the injection of 500 million cocci, and this initial dose was increased in successive groups by 250 or 500 million until it had reached 2,000 million. For the second and third doses in each group, the first dose was usually multiplied by two and by four…About half of those vaccinated, whose third injection was due after February 4, 1918, were given a final injection of 4,000 million, on account of the occurrence of several fairly severe reactions from the larger dose among medical officers at Fort Riley. In some regiments the vaccinations had been completed before February 5."[16]
At the same time Kansas military bases were being vaccinated, schools were, for the first time, seriously mandating vaccines for attendance in Kansas. From the Lawrence Daily Journal World, 3 Jan. 1918: [17]
JJ made an offhand comment the other night about all the crappy papers he's had to read over the past four years. I'd love to hear him go through a couple and suss out the things he sees in them to make them crappy. I have read crappy papers as well, but I don't know "biologically" why they are crappy, I just think I know why "logically" they are crappy. Any time a study starts going in about estimates predicated on models know we are dealing with a loosely built theory based on unrproven assumptions.
And the fate of their world domination and democide racketeering psyop poison jabs hangs in the balance if people understand there is unequivocally no scientific evidence of viruses.
If you like having your gut inform you … don’t take IVERMECTIN regularly; it will damage (wreck) your gut microbiome. Note that the gut microbiome is also mission critical to your immune system. Connect dots now.
Tonight I listened to the jj couey "study hall" on prions. He's doing a series of three, this is the first. I will have to listen a few times, to put it together. It's quite interesting. It also becomes clear that things assumed to be damage from a virus are likely from the shots.
Very sciency, he walks you through it step by step, so you can follow. He's also figuring it out as he goes along. There's been much misinformation and misdirection. His view is that good science can take us in the right direction.
So many videos tonight. My brain needs to do something mindless to recover.
Yeah, so, I've been deep diving on this and really struggling. I'm looking at bacteriophages right now. They're basically "viruses" that invade bacteria. We have electron microscope pics of them and I pretty sure they're real. I'm forming theories and will report back.
YOU don’t understand, you dirty dumb poors.
We have very advanced computational modeling.
Like the one model that a Brit cooked up that formed the basis for this entire doom scenario.
Do you see the cover that offloading decisions to the machines provides? You can apply this to every space that AI is being used. AI is only as good as its code and learning. Bias present in the programmer will result in bias in the generated information. It doesn’t matter if it was intentional or not, but it will be intentional. They’ll want to hold these systems up as all knowing and impartial. They want a ‘rational’ excuse to slaughter.
Wow does that music video throw off ultra vibes!
So, viruses are questionable. Alt med is questionable. PCR is questionable. Science is questionable. Death stats and records are questionable. Basically all of the superstructure of the pandemic, as well as the minutia is questionable. Is the whole thing kabuki top to bottom? A hall of mirrors?
I know about a dozen people dead over the past four years. And many more with damage of some kind. Some very damaged. That’s it. That’s all I ‘know’ for sure.
I think a lot of times the “isolate a virus” question is set up as a straw man as a basis for religious fundamentalism on either side. I suspect for answering the “how do these things work” or “what is really going on” questions, isolating a virus makes as much as isolating a lung to study human behavior. Pretty sure the correct answer to most of these questions is “we really have no idea”
Advanced Superfuckery.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2SMSoblH3Y
We are detectives, we are select....
Questions about the video: If you have to isolate the virus to identify it, but you can't yet do that adequately, doesn't that mean that you can't demonstrate that the virus caused an epidemic? This doesn't mean there aren't viruses. And it doesn't mean that there are viruses. I'm neutral on that question. (It's the old "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" but also doesn't rule it in)
The 3 questions in the video are very simple and should be answerable by science. If they can't be, what does that imply?
If you can't demonstrate that, then how might you justify the shutdowns, mandates, "shots", hospital murders, etc.?
This whole story doesn't hold together too well.
Extra credit question: How did flu disappear the moment "covid19" showed up?
What they call viruses could be any number of things caused by starvation of cells and the addition of various toxic substances such as antibiotics and antifungals, that cause the already abnormal cell lines to react and die.
These "experiments" use all sorts of tricks to obtain the desired results. For example they used Vero E6 cells derived from the kidneys of African green monkeys; human hepatocyte cell lines taken from a liver tumour in 1982 and subsequently cultured; and human HeLa cells derived from a female human in 1951 suffering from cervical carcinoma and subsequently cultured.
To the cell lines they add inorganic salts, foetal bovine serum to feed the cells, and an array of cytotoxic items such amphotericin B – an anti-fungal, trypsin, penicillin – an antibiotic, streptomycin – another antibiotic, glutaraldehyde, which produces exosomes from the cell culture that are indistinguishable from the short strands from the host’s lung fluid – a disinfectant, and osmium tetroxide – an acutely toxic oxidising agent, and epoxy resin– to create a solid substrate for ultra-thin slicing.
Could also simply be nano-particles in and around culture cells which resulted from the laboratory experiments themselves or millions of unique genetic fragments from the sample, innumerable microbes, even from the air a subject breathed.
In one of the SARS-CoV-2 experiments often cited they were unable to find “virions” with the purported spike protein, so they added more trypsin to the cell culture medium, and the trypsin, the function of which is to digest proteins, had corroded the outer protein layer of the alleged “virion” which showed the characteristic crown-like fringe of "spike proteins”, which, they draw some arrows on in the artists rendition color it purple and tell everyone how deadly it is.
There is nothing legitimate about any of this.
Nowadays most of these images are nothing more than computer generated images representing an artist’s impression.
For clarification there is no such thing as "no virus" people these are individuals that are demanding scientific proof based on proper scientific methodologies.
Genomic sequencing and the entirety of gene theory is also quack science.
Addendum: Why The Establishment of the "health freedom movement" (the dissenters already have formed an Establishment- say what?!) are so bothered by such scientific inquiry and use the EXACT same techniques of dismissal and derision as is used against them by the mainstream political and scientific establishment seems to escape their awareness. I think that's called hypocrisy and is quite a red flag.
Plague Book Series Deep Dive Overview $79.00 Self-paced
https://odem.cloud/program-details/2054
More than ever, it is critical that we understand the distinction between real scientific research and the fraud that has all but taken over our scientific literature.
In this series, Dr. Judy walks you through the important topics from all three books that should have ended these plandemics before they began and which was covered in her science paper published in 2009!
Join her in this interactive program to gain a deeper understanding of the ethical dilemmas that researchers face, and the complex relationship between science and public health policy.
part 2
Another telling fact: these “pandemic” articles were never big front-page stories—they were buried next to church news and the latest sales of eyeglasses.
According to a 1920 Harvard historical document, 5000 people in Boston died from the Pandemic of 1918, and the same article reported that Boston was the third largest city death count in America.[3] This fact also leads one to again question the death count of 500,000 in the US. It also explains the curious fact that no one in my family mentioned this purportedly horrific disease event. My grandparents and great uncles and aunts, who were alive and working in 1918, never discussed a pandemic or even any big disease outbreak. My grandfather was a barnyard musician and great story teller who told me family tales about everything-- Great Aunt Delia falling into the cistern, the problems of using a clevis pin in 20 below zero weather to hook the T-bar to the horse drawn wagon--but not one peep about the Great Pandemic of 1918. Although it would have occurred in the prime of his young adulthood, the “Great Pandemic” apparently was not a major event in his life. In his diary which he faithfully kept daily from 1893 to 1963 there is one entry in 1918 that some relative “got the flu”. No further mention of death or disability—and he faithfully recorded these events over the years. My father was 13 years old at the time of the pandemic. He discussed with me that he had osteomyelitis -- an infection of his tibia that resulted in his being bedridden for months when he was around 10 years old. This should have focused his attention on the issue of disease and recovery. But he never mentioned “the pandemic”. As an adult, he earned his MD, DDS and a PhD in biochemistry, taught Dentistry at Harvard, did research, practiced medicine, and was generally a student of 20th century history—but a “pandemic” was not on his radar. I recently spoke to a group of about 350 people, and simply asked anyone to tell me afterward if they had ever heard family talk about the loss of members in the “Pandemic” of 1918. Only one person told me that her family passed down a story, but when she investigated it, the person had actually died years before the outbreak.
Why the pandemic was called the Spanish flu is unclear. The disease did not start in Spain, but rather, around Fort Riley Kansas which was a training base for the First World War. Army recruits at the base were becoming ill, and many were dying of a strange pulmonic disorder associated with fever, severe fatigue, and bloody discharge. We have numerous sources of direct history of the event—memory books that were written by families, the diary and later books of Dr. Eleanora McBean who volunteered with her family to provide care to the recruits, the autopsy results of Colonel William Welch and pathologists from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, pharmaceutical history, Kansas historical Archives, Nany and Public Health Service Archives, and numerous other eyewitness accounts. Unlike today, the US Public Health Service made an honest attempt to understand transmission of the illness. They enlisted volunteers who leaned over the dying without touching them, putting their mouths close to the mouths of the sick, and breathing in their exhalations. The volunteers did not become ill. Then, they had sick and dying people cough on the volunteers. They swabbed mucus and nasal secretions from the sick and stuffed it into the noses and throats of the well. In the days before antibiotics, they even spun down the secretions of the dying and injected this solution into the well volunteers. But no matter what they did, they could not transfer this new disease to the healthy volunteers. In actual numbers, zero out of 118 well volunteers became sick. From the Navy Archives, “The volunteers were repeatedly exposed to hospital patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms in an attempt to make them contract the disease. Although the 118 men failed to develop influenza, they all received full pardons in recognition of their participation.”[4] (This tells you the “volunteers” were actually not so voluntary—probably being in the brig at the time.)
Curiously, horses were also affected with this respiratory disease, so they tried to prove transmission in horses. They moved feed bags from the snout of a sick horse to a healthy horse. No healthy horse became sick. They tried to find a bacillus that accounted for the disease but could not find bacilli that were not also found in the well. In spite of all this, at the end of time, they just could not give up the notion of person-to-person transmission, (or like today they were being incentivized and/or coerced by the pharmaceutical companies). The reluctant conclusion of the Public Health Service researchers at the time was this (reproduced with the original bold and capitalized emphasis):
“The results of these experiments indicate PRESUMPTIVELY that influenza MAY be transmitted by means of the secretions of the upper respiratory passages from patients in the early stages of this disease, probably within less than 12 hours from onset. VERY DEFINITE CONCLUSIONS CAN NOT BE DRAWN…These conclusions, however, contradict the specific results of each of the three series of experiments reported within the document, where we find that NONE of the volunteer soldiers exposed to the fluids of patients with symptoms of Spanish Flu contracted the Spanish Flu symptoms.”[5]
Dr. William Welch and a team of AFIP Pathologists, bravely undertook to autopsy the dead. (This should be the first line of inquiry in any new “disease” but was actually prohibited by the medical authorities in the age of COVID.). Caretakers of the dying, in 1918, had observed that young men would develop fever and cough, then suddenly would cough up blood and die. The autopsies of the troops revealed that many of them had lungs filled with blood. Some were “consolidated” or edematous and bacteria were consistently found. But the pathologists could not understand how “bacterial pneumonia” would act so differently in 1918 than any previous encounters. A review was done 100 years later by researcher Zon-Mei Sheng et al., who reviewed paraffin tissue blocks from Army personnel who had died of the disease. “All 68 cases had histological evidence of bacterial pneumonia, and 94% showed abundant bacteria on Gram stain.”
part 5
A summary of the time course of the 1918 Pandemic
May 25, 1917, an Army Medical School had been established at Ft. Riley, Kansas.
October, 1917, 525 cases of Typhoid Fever occurred in Kansas and the State Board of Health gives 9,000 “free shots” in response to 525 cases of Typhoid Fever in Kansas.
October and November, 1917, Meningitis breaks out and a second round of vaccines—this time for Meningitis was given.
In January and February of 2018, Military recruits, and school children, , were required to have a variety of crude vaccines partially concocted at the time of inoculation. Although I cannot prove this in the news, it is likely that—as is true today—the Indian Health Service pushed vaccination on the Native Americans.
One month later, in March of 1918, Scarlet Fever epidemics were reported from Cowley, Butler, Dickinson and Leavenworth counties.
Also in March 1918, five students at the (Native American) Haskell Institute 95 miles from Ft. Riley had died and 457 were ill with a disease called “strep-grip.”
In September 1918, the disease still was not front-page news. Throughout this time, there were more concerns over wheat shortages, Anti-German discrimination, and conscientious objectors to the war. The Kansas City Star reported that Mrs. James Farrell, Effingham, was the knitting champion of Atchison County. She had knitted 100 pairs of socks for the Red Cross since August, 1917.
In October, 1918, three hundred cases of what was now being called “Influenza” was being reported in the state. Hays was hardest hit with 200 cases yet still reported only several deaths. By the middle of October, 1918, Kansas Governor Capper issued a state-wide closing order, effective for one week, in an effort to halt the flu epidemic. Over 7,000 cases had been reported statewide. Even accounting for underreporting this does not suggest a pandemic of epic proportion. Also on October 25, 1918, my grandfather recorded in his diary that relatives arrived from Canada and a few days later the town of 1200 people was put on quarantine.
2 November, 1918, The State Board of Health in Kansas lifted the influenza closing order.
This graph shows the very acute time course of influenza deaths in 1918, beginning about 6 months after the vaccinations took place, and going away three months later—never to return.
From: Sheng, ZM, Chertow, DS, Ambroggio, X et al,
Although we have seasonal illness we call Influenza, and occasionally Influenza breaks out worldwide as it has done for centuries, never since 1918 have we seen this unusually lethal type of outbreak until 2019 and the COVID “Pandemic”. What is discounted, forgotten, or purposely ignored are the observations of Dr. Eleanora McBean who actually witnessed the outbreak at Ft. Riley, Kansas, and as a child helped her family care for sick soldiers and community members. Writing later, as a physician, she reported that the only deaths were in the vaccinated. Her family was exposed to diseased people daily, along with others who volunteered to care for the sick. They were unvaccinated and as people were dying around them, according to Dr. McBean they “didn’t even get the sniffles”.
Most of the historical search for this article focused on Kansas because it is generally cited as ground zero for the “Great Pandemic”. Looking about America, the disease disproportionately hit cities, and concentrations of military or other people living together in dormitories or Indian Reservations. These people were mandated to have vaccines, or were likely to have been told by their local authorities to do so. Neither the numbers cited by any individual city or locale, nor by the counties seem to add to the gross numbers we hear today. It is apparent that in a few places, an unusual number of folks became unusually ill. These places—such as Fort Riley and Boston generated a mythos that was remembered by the medical establishment more than the public at large.
People who developed neurasthenia, in the absence of vaccination, could become symptomatic, but did not develop the severe pulmonary symptoms and were found in some studies to live longer than average. But propaganda seems to have been deployed consciously via the newspapers from 1920 to today regarding the causes of the disease of 1918.
Looking at the totality of the evidence, the Pandemic of 1918 was not probably a communicable disease, but a disease of communicable technologies. Americans went to Europe and we took our Telegram equipment and vaccines with us for sale on the European market. When the soldiers were returning home, the public was convinced through aggressive marketing campaigns to get vaccinated because the troops were returning from Europe with “Disease”. The vaccine timing explains the huge spike of disease and death during a narrow time range following a rapid multiple vaccination rollout. The later prolonged, less dramatic occurrences of death followed a more sluggish civilian adoption of the vaccine program.
The Pandemic of 1918 as the prototype of infectious transmissible worldwide disease is based on skewed history, propaganda, and assumptions, not proof. This underscores the need today for true systematic scientific inquiry where we examine the basics and the basis of our views of biology and disease--not just an “Epidemiologic” mapping of sick people, coupled with preconceived notions. In fact, it is difficult not to wonder about the role of the Rockefeller Institute under Gates Senior orchestrating this whole show. Given the physicians and scientists who have unexpectedly died in the 20th century, such as famous cancer researcher Dr. Mary Sherman of SV-40 fame, it is worth mention that Dr. Frederick Gates, after the war, and after his father was deceased, moved to Harvard where he died young from a blow to the head. In less polite circles that might be suspected as “cutting the trail”.
part 4
The biology/physiology of this effect is at least partly understood. Metabolism depends on an electron transfer chain within the mitochondria—intracellular organelles which take the results of metabolism and convert it energy within each living cell. The flow of electrons can be altered with the application of a sudden electromagnetic field. Additionally, the rate at which the EMF is introduced matters. In medicine, we once were taught “Cannon’s Law of the Body” that the body responds to rate of change not just absolutes. We are physiologically better able to adapt to a new environment if it is applied slowly. So, in the 1918 Ft. Riley outbreak, some recruits—not previously exposed to electricity-- were suddenly surrounded by miles of copper wire transmitting signals that were typed out at discordant 7.2 Hz frequency, just shy of the natural Schumann earth resonance of 7.83 Hz. It was observed by doctors stationed at the army camps during the autumn 1918 wave of influenza, that those young men who were dying, more often than not, big, were the big brawny country boys, not the pale, scrawny city boys. This makes sense when you consider that the city kids had already been slowly adapted to the electrification of their cities. [12]
Prior to 1900, medical studies of Telegrapher’s disease and Neurasthenia actually showed that people may have had a miserable anxiety ridden existence, but it did not shorten their life span—in fact life span may have been slightly extended. So, what accounted for the sudden mass death in the camp? There were at least two other factors contributing to the Pandemic death count that are very reminiscent of COVID deaths today.
In 1918, The Bayer Company, a subsidiary of IG Farben, had just lost their patent on Aspirin, a drug that German scientists accidentally discovered lowered fever. So, the company waged a PR campaign to convince doctors via the AMA and the newly organized medical education establishment that lowering temperature with Aspirin, was a great idea for recovery from disease! Today, we have considerable data from India on the treatment of Tuberculosis and Polio, that fever is beneficial to resolving disease. Lowering temperature by chemical means extended the active phase of disease and resulted in more paralysis and increased mortality. But that information was not available in 1918, (and still ignored by most physicians today).
Nor did physicians of 1918 understand the risk of bleeding with higher dosing of Aspirin. Diarists of the pandemic report seeing doctors giving handfuls of aspirin to reduce the fever in recruits. And, in confirmation, it was noted by physicians in 1918 that as the disease progressed, victims began bleeding from the nose, and mouth. Many deaths subsequently occurred with hemorrhagic lungs—lungs filled with blood, not pus.
Finally, and probably the most damaging, yet debated, factor was this: WWI was the first conflict in which our military were given multiple (and experimental) vaccines.
Dr. Frederick L. Gates was from not one but multiple Ivy League Schools, beginning at the U. of Chicago and transferring to Yale where he was awarded the Andrew D. White award.(White was a member of the Order of Skull and Bones). Gates subsequently graduated with honors from Johns Hopkins Medical School in 1913, and in 1917 when America entered the war, volunteered for the Army Medical Corps. He was commissioned as a First Lieutenant. Surprisingly, for a newly minted medical officer, Gates was assigned to duty on the Rockefeller Institute staff, likely due to his father Frederick Taylor Gates being a personal assistant to John D. Rockefeller.
Gates the elder is credited with Rockefeller’s getting involved in organized medicine. “ Although Rockefeller himself believed in folk medicine, the billionaire listened to his experts, and Gates convinced him that he could have the greatest impact by modernizing medicine especially by reforming education, sponsoring research to identify cures, and systematically eradicating debilitating diseases that sapped national efficiency like hookworm…In 1901, Gates Senior designed the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University), of which he was board president. He then designed the Rockefeller Foundation, becoming a trustee upon its creation in 1913.” [13]
According to his memorial biography, Dr. Frederick L. Gates “gave lectures to military groups (at the Rockefeller Institute) … was also assigned to visit training camps, in the interest of preventive medicine, and traveled widely”. What they don’t mention is his role as primary investigator on the vaccinations given at Ft. Riley, Kansas prior to the outbreak of disease.
On May 25, 1917 an Army Medical School had been established at Ft. Riley, Kansas. Shortly thereafter, in October 1917, 525 cases of Typhoid Fever occurred in Kansas, and the State Board of Health gave 9,000 “free shots”.[14] Three months later, an outbreak of “meningitis” occurred. The US Navy and Army estimated that 40 percent and 36 percent of their servicemen had been affected.[15] (It is important to note that an “outbreak” of meningitis usually involves one or two people. The largest outbreaks in the last 50 years I could identify were groups of gay men in San Francisco and LA with 20-30 cases. To have over 30% of personnel affected is totally outside the norm for reported outbreaks of meningitis.) The response again was to administer more crude home-made meningitis vaccines, beginning in January 1918 and continuing into February 1918.
From the Kansas historical society records:
“Following an outbreak of epidemic meningitis at Camp Funston, Kansas, in October and November, 1917, a series of anti-meningitis vaccinations was undertaken on volunteer subjects from the camp. Major E. H. Schorer, Chief of the Laboratory Section at the adjacent Base Hospital at Fort Riley, offered every facility at his command and cooperated in the laboratory work connected with the vaccinations… In the camp, under the direction of the Division Surgeon, Lieutenant Colonel J. L. Shepard, a preliminary series of vaccinations on a relatively small number of volunteers served to determine the appropriate doses and the resultant local and general reactions. Following this series, the vaccine was offered by the Division Surgeon to the camp at large, and "given by the regimental surgeons to all who wished to take it.”
This excerpt from Dr. Gates’ paper on the research submitted for publication in 1918 gives you a flavor of the state of vaccination art and his involvement at that time:
“The vaccine used was made in the laboratory of The Rockefeller Institute. 16-hour growths on 1 per cent glucose agar in Blake bottles were washed off with isotonic salt solution, like strains pooled, and the concentrated suspensions immediately heated to 65°C. for 30 minutes to kill the cocci and inactivate the autolytic ferment…Accordingly, the vaccinations were begun with the injection of 500 million cocci, and this initial dose was increased in successive groups by 250 or 500 million until it had reached 2,000 million. For the second and third doses in each group, the first dose was usually multiplied by two and by four…About half of those vaccinated, whose third injection was due after February 4, 1918, were given a final injection of 4,000 million, on account of the occurrence of several fairly severe reactions from the larger dose among medical officers at Fort Riley. In some regiments the vaccinations had been completed before February 5."[16]
At the same time Kansas military bases were being vaccinated, schools were, for the first time, seriously mandating vaccines for attendance in Kansas. From the Lawrence Daily Journal World, 3 Jan. 1918: [17]
JJ made an offhand comment the other night about all the crappy papers he's had to read over the past four years. I'd love to hear him go through a couple and suss out the things he sees in them to make them crappy. I have read crappy papers as well, but I don't know "biologically" why they are crappy, I just think I know why "logically" they are crappy. Any time a study starts going in about estimates predicated on models know we are dealing with a loosely built theory based on unrproven assumptions.
It’s a pseudoscience thoroughbred.
And the fate of their world domination and democide racketeering psyop poison jabs hangs in the balance if people understand there is unequivocally no scientific evidence of viruses.
“My gut is there.
Gut out in front of the brain.”
If you like having your gut inform you … don’t take IVERMECTIN regularly; it will damage (wreck) your gut microbiome. Note that the gut microbiome is also mission critical to your immune system. Connect dots now.
Tonight I listened to the jj couey "study hall" on prions. He's doing a series of three, this is the first. I will have to listen a few times, to put it together. It's quite interesting. It also becomes clear that things assumed to be damage from a virus are likely from the shots.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2124045049
Very sciency, he walks you through it step by step, so you can follow. He's also figuring it out as he goes along. There's been much misinformation and misdirection. His view is that good science can take us in the right direction.
So many videos tonight. My brain needs to do something mindless to recover.
Yeah, so, I've been deep diving on this and really struggling. I'm looking at bacteriophages right now. They're basically "viruses" that invade bacteria. We have electron microscope pics of them and I pretty sure they're real. I'm forming theories and will report back.