43 Comments
Apr 19·edited Apr 20Liked by Sage Hana

Video nails it Sage... and also the ridiculous speed of Covid "identification " and supposed "isolation" (based on sequences uploaded to Genebank in China... "people don't ask the right questions" ... How did they get these sequences soooooo quick?!)... Yeilded from one patient in Wuhan and one patient in Melbourne... somehow this new claimed-to-be-isolated virus was also deemed the "causitive" agent for the pneumonia being seen.??

Causation, as your video shows, is a big leap, and would take a long time to prove... Not one f*king month... But no, they say it's causitive...

As stated before, within the realms of mainstream science... knowing it is likely a partial fraud at least... but anyway...

200 viruses are known to cause respiratory ailments, but 40% remain unknown*.. That means, someone can come in deathly ill from an unusual virus, and science in the past just could never isolate and/or identify the virus (if indeed it was ever a virus)... so how, from just one patient in Wuhan and one in Melbourne, did they miraculously do this... ??

Why did they pour all their resources into this, that means big $$$$ spent.??.. For a suspected virus no more lethal than the seasonal flu?? What was so special about this in Jan 2020????

And given a cubic metre of air contains something like 40,000,000 different viruses**... How can they identify covid, soooooo quick??! Out of all the viruses in the air, in the patient, floating about in the lab, how did they single this virus out???? ... And determine causation??

Approx 99% of ALL viruses on earth have never been identified...

So how do they know they haven't "isolated" a never identified before virus that is harmless??

I suspect they don't... and covid exists only as a predetermined sequence uploaded to genebank, which would be detectable by PCR due to some commonality with other known viruses...

Therefore PCR says "covid" to a number of known viruses perhaps as JJ Couey notes...

But this genebank sequence also contains a number of damaging signature Frankenstein sequences of "covid" that would do damage if injected into someone, or even more damage if delivered as a genetic code to someone's cells??

Just thinking out aloud, but you have a design that has commonalities with a normal virus, but also unique damaging features (hence the "made in a lab" observations)

Also they had PCR test kits (Drosten protocol) ready to go... Very sus... Millions and millions of units ready to go... Ready ... By 10th January 2020... What?? How?????

Despite PCR not being diagnostic***, and as JJ Couey put forward, the primers are only able to detect basically ANY coronavirus... CDC warned (buried in a wordy document ) that PCR is not diagnostic and cannot determine CAUSATION, yet that's exactly how it was used...

That video was excellent Sage... I hadn't seen it before.

Some sources (if interested)

*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077230/

*Biology (2nd Edition) 1989 Raven and Johnson page 576.

**https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/there-are-more-viruses-earth-there-are-stars-universe-180974433/

**https://youtu.be/Of6BRUWXdUg?si=319hBMd-DeyzvBcP

*** Page 38: "Detection of viral RNA may NOT indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the CAUSATIVE agent for clinical symptoms"

"This test CANNOT rule out diseases caused by OTHER BACTERIAL or VIRAL pathogens.”

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

***Dr JJ Couey at the National Citizens Enquiry in Canada. The PCR could not be tuned to look for covid so much as to look for ANY background coronavirus... At 32:45 timecode:

https://rumble.com/v2kzyiq-jjcouey-dr.-jj-couey-phd-testifies-at-the-nci-national-citizens-inquiry-res.html

"The PCR can't differentiate between any of these coronaviruses" (meaning covid or any another coronavirus)

Expand full comment
Apr 18Liked by Sage Hana

Has the Aussie Team ever shown their isolate of the covid virus? From 2020?? And that video about the 3 steps to prove a virus diagnosis is spot on.

Expand full comment

Us NAVs are coming for your liver

Expand full comment
Apr 18Liked by Sage Hana

No, I disagree a bit. I think it takes talent/creativity/thinking to see the (in hindsight obvious) discrepancies. You have a good knack “ IBut it really really really does not seem to take much building block digging to sort out massive logical discrepancies and coincidental overlaps of narrators.”

Expand full comment

The video was excellent! It's so simple, just three steps. Can't "the science" just follow those three simple steps? We've give them gazillions of dollars and all they've done is buy up lotsa propaganda airspace and lotsa pharm products but where's the special magic spikey virus?

Just three steps. So simple a kindergartener could understand it. But they can't. They can lock you in your house, make you cover your face, close your business, make you lose your job, put poison in you, and in some countries send the goon squad to beat you and/or lock you up if you don't do what these things. Oh, and they can kill your grandma or child or spouse or friend.

But they can't just do those three simple steps.

Expand full comment

BASIC SALES - CREATE A NEED

Stimulate FEAR of something very dangerous, deadly, that will never be seen … say a virus (translation-poison).

The NEED is for SECURITY and SAFETY from the invisible life threatening danger lurking in the darkness.

Enter the DOD/BIG PHARMA who will provide the PRODUCT (namely safety and security).

“Creating a need in sales is an art that requires strategic planning and execution. Grasping the knack of stirring up customer interest is a must for sales professionals, entrepreneurs, and small business proprietors wishing to maximize their revenue.

By examining the psychological profile of your target customer, you can hone in on their needs and adjust your offerings accordingly. By identifying demographic characteristics and understanding psychographic attributes, you can better tailor your offerings to meet their needs.” -Justin McGill

Expand full comment

Also snapped up to be Rhodes Scholars. I'm sure there are numerous programs snapping up youngins and giving out ostensible reasons only to use them to do evil.

Expand full comment

The Jane Ruby video is great! Thank you

Expand full comment

Surprisingly I have not come across the Sherpa coauthored paper I’ve been expecting to pop out of the past…

Expand full comment

Gotta hide the cancer cures

Expand full comment

Yes “ I think is how “The Science” gets done.

Brilliant minds are snapped up young, rewarded and given a collection of ostensible reasons for research and funded to do just that.”

Expand full comment
Apr 19·edited Apr 19

Last 30 seconds of last video, the 5 minute version -

Sage James Hana-Brown ...............!

Expand full comment
founding

Many things happen in vitro that don't happen in vivo.

One example: little gas bubbles which are taken to be cell organelles.

They invent a lot of stories about those. Sometimes, the delusion ends soon, after a few decades of speculation. But sometimes the delusion reaches the wikipedia-level of reality, and everyone is screwed.

Ribosomes. Most scientists believe they are real. They're not, according to Harold Hillman.

Because, if cells produce proteins, well, there has to be a special organelle, many of them, which acts as a factory of proteins.

We cannot think about anything but the usual industrial and military analogies.

Proteins: self-assembling nanostructures with electromagnetic two-way communication abilities.

What do proteins do? They do stuff. It's like magic.

Proteins also feature the triboelectric effect and the piezoelectric effect. Probably, you know when you are running because your bones (mostly protein) get compressed and released, causing a small electric signal. That's the piezo.

The tribo effect is when you a shih tzu gets scared and his hackles rise.

DNA is overrated. Proteins rock!

Expand full comment
founding

https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/151f0179-603e-41ad-80c0-3108e43c5d5d

omg...i'm cross eyed. I'm not sure that it makes sense at all.

Expand full comment

Hi. Just to say ... the virus has never been isolated. A Warrior Calls with Chris James has a "bundle" of proof to research if there is any interest. Over 200 FOIR .. freedom of information requests evidence that proves it has never been isolated by anyone in the world. Thanks.

Expand full comment