If you actually wanted "a second opinion" about the shots, wouldn't you have WANTED Christina Parks and David Wiseman to warn about potential mRNA Reverse Transcription into the Human Genome?
If you actually wanted "a second opinion" about the shots, wouldn't you have WANTED Christina Parks and David Wiseman to warn about potential mRNA Reverse Transcription into the Human Genome?
If you actually wanted "a second opinion" about the shots, wouldn't you have WANTED Christina Parks and David Wiseman to warn about potential mRNA Reverse Transcription into the Human Genome?
If you actually wanted "a second opinion…
If you actually wanted "a second opinion" about the shots, wouldn't you have WANTED Christina Parks and David Wiseman to warn about potential mRNA Reverse Transcription into the Human Genome?
This thread is only visible to paid subscribers of Sage’s Newsletter
Comments on this post are for paid subscribers