I'm chuckling now as I retrospectively interpret that Jamie Raskin spat on Kovid Kongress Theater.
And Kirsch of course having Jay and Kulldorff at the MIT Spat.
And Jay shows up on Ron DeSantis with Evergreen and this whole fake feud with Fauci.
All staged, me thinks.
All Pro Wrestling.
To position the next set of Trusted Experts picking one issue, (treatments! just jab the olds! lockdowns bad!) and still co-signing the fake pandemic and the need for countermeasures. To "protect" the people they need to get rid of. Off the rock.
That 2008 paper is pretty significative. That's the last year of Bush Dubya and the year when Hope was elected and people got Obama in a very fast switcheroo. No one noticed!
I remember financial people were saying then things like "well, look at the marvel that is the iPhone! Computers always get better and cheaper! why that doesn't ever happen in college, transportation, healthcare, etc."
And they were complaining precisely about the conclusion of this paper: Demographics swamp the effects of the most impressive technological developments.
BULLSHIT!!!
Everyone knows it's a huge lie. If energy was cheaper everything else would become better and cheaper.
If energy was cheaper, disease would really be prevented.
If energy was cheaper, cures would really happen.
Computers get cheaper and better because they are produced in countries of dirt-cheap energy.
That's the main variable. Demographics is a façade.
I have no doubt that McCain would have tanked the economy too.
Perhaps he would have invaded Iran and Russia with the sales pitch of restoring the economy. If the people are not fooled by candidate A they will be fooled by candidate B. Programs may vary about 0.2%, but everything else is a continuation of everything.
I now think it makes no sense to blame Trump voters just like it made no sense to blame Obama voters.
How far back does it go? They were in Charge in 45.
Rand background:
~On May 14, 1948, Project RAND—an organization formed immediately after World War II to connect military planning with research and development decisions—separated from the Douglas Aircraft Company of Santa Monica, California, and became an independent, nonprofit organization. Adopting its name from a contraction of the term Research AND Development, the newly formed entity was dedicated to furthering and promoting scientific, educational, and charitable purposes for the public welfare and security of the United States.
Almost at once, RAND developed a unique style. It blended scrupulous nonpartisanship with rigorous, fact-based analysis to tackle society's most pressing problems. Over time, RAND assembled a unique corps of researchers, notable not only for their individual skills but also for their commitment to interdisciplinary cooperation. By the 1960s, RAND was bringing its trademark mode of empirical, nonpartisan, independent analysis to the study of many urgent domestic social and economic problems. In subsequent decades, RAND extended its focus beyond the United States with the goal of making individuals, communities, and nations safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. ~
Reads like a comedy eh?
With all the new talent inherited from WWII what better way to lift mankind to unimaginable heights.
UFB.
In a secret directive circulated on September 3, 1946, President Truman officially approved Operation Paperclip and expanded it to include 1,000 German scientists under "temporary, limited military custody".[8][9][10] News media revealed the program as early as December 1946.[11]
Satanic Science founded on spiderwebs and batshit. The fog isn’t nearly dense enough any longer to hide Baal’s outline. Slamming its slaves into the matrix with both fists to broadside the stunned herd.
2017 Study: The legalization of medical assistance in dying will affect health care spending in Canada. Our aim was to determine the potential costs and savings associated with the implementation of medical assistance in dying. 80% of patients will have cancer; 50% of patients will be aged 60–80 years. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/3/E101
RESULTS: Medical assistance in dying could reduce annual health care spending across Canada by between $34.7 million and $138.8 million, exceeding the $1.5–$14.8 million in direct costs associated with its implementation.
And so we observe the Sleepers walk off the Edge, cheering and gesturing MAGAMAHA spells.
"I see this plain as day right now and I didn’t even spend time in the federal government or the Rand Satan Corporation or go to Harvard or Yale or Stanford or MIT." Sage Hana
That's WHY you see it plain as day.
Because no one made sausage out of your brain in any one of the meat prestigious packing houses.
SH: I see this plain as day right now and I didn’t even spend time in the federal government or the Rand Satan Corporation or go to Harvard or Yale or Stanford or MIT.
Me: I believe that this line should read "I see this plain as day right now because I didn’t spend time in the federal government or the Rand Satan Corporation or go to Harvard or Yale or Stanford or MIT".
IMHO the psyop of psyops is emphasize differences, encourage inside "group member" discussions using insider hidden meaning to the words used (like conspiracy theorist), project mockingbird media use of "the new meaning" of the same old words encouraging being hip or in the know or special. This is just the tip of the iceberg regarding implementations off divide and conquer.
Your version of the sentence shows exactly what they create emotionally = "I am not like you" which complicates things by bringing feelings into the discussion which is neither good or bad by itself but can cause an avoidance of complicated ideas. Just give me the emotional thrill but hold the long discussion. So armadillos and chimichangas replace "is self psychology really worth the effort?" *grins*
Then throw in Pavlovian conditioning from advertising mostly to brainwash people into thinking they can earn more money and things they want but don't have by being in a club and voila, you get a company of workers that are incompetent at getting people to pay for their services and a new government assisted business that does not have to please customers. They can get the government bureaucrats to take the money from people, whether the people like it or not and pay the workers to do something the common person would never pay for.
How do I get you to give to me? Let me count the ways.......
This is just the tip of the iceberg. It's been going on for a long time. Parasitic divide and conquer. Free thinkers who are paying attention are not allowed in the "approved clubs". Just reward is good" and "punishment is bad" binary thinkers only, thank you. If you do get in to check the place out remember to leave any ethics and morals at the door where they will not offend binary sensibilities.
Dr. Rima Laibow, MD, describes in her Substack this week how her father was "murdered" in a hospital in Florida in 2010. She says that what the hospital did was made legal by ObamaCare: "March 23, 2010, it became a matter of national policy...the Affordable Care Act...did what the UK just did, what Canada is doing and what country after country is doing in keeping with yet another part of the United Nations’ diabolical Malthusian Management scheme, better known as the “Sustainable Development Goals.” https://substack.com/home/post/p-152298451
Eugenics is a word we inherited from our ancestors the Greeks.
It means “wellborn.”
Eu - the first syllable translates as “good”.
Genics - the second syllable translates as “born”.
The term eugenics was coined in the 1880s'.
a. Eugenics is the practice, advocacy and study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. The purpose is to improve the human species by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. It aims to reduce human suffering by “breeding out” disease, disabilities and so-called undesirable characteristics from the human population.
b. Early supporters of eugenics believed people inherited mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions could be bred out of the gene pool. It was a social and political philosophy, based loosely on Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory and Francis Galton’s research on hereditary genius, that seeks to eradicate genetic defects and improve the genetic makeup of populations through selective human breeding.
c. Eugenics is directed toward promoting reproduction by individuals with ostensibly superior traits.
d. Eugenics is: Intelligent Selection and it alone offers man an opportunity never given to any other species— a chance to transcend the limitations and cruelties of the natural selection which shaped his destiny for so long.
e. Intelligent selection is the means whereby the more intelligent people will bring more of their kind into the world. Instead of killing off the unfit at an early age, as primitive natural selection did, it would simply slow the rate at which the unintelligent breed, while encouraging the intelligent to breed at a higher rate. This is an elementary procedure in the science of husbandry, yet when humans seek to apply it to themselves, they are confronted by a mass of altruistic emotions and attitudes inherited from our distant past. Only lack of understanding or downright inertia prevents man from benefiting from his own greatest discovery.
f. Eugenics has nothing to do with murdering anyone.
Negative Eugenics
It is not that childbearing should be off limits to unintelligent people. This would only be justified in such extreme cases as persistent criminality and incurable and uncontrollable hereditary diseases. It is simply that the reproduction of the less useful members of society should not be encouraged and subsidized. More important, they should not be prevented from obtaining information about contraception. We should be as charitable to the unfortunate as our circumstances permit, but we should not assist those with hereditary mental deficiencies to incapacitate their descendants. If we continue to do so, Homo sapiens will become increasingly less sapient. Simple devices and precautions which enable those with transmittable defects to control their reproduction are now widely available. We must see that the unfortunate ones know about and are encouraged to use contraceptive techniques. Whereas negative eugenics is directed toward preventing reproduction by individuals with traits that are considered to be undesirable.
"increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable."
"promoting reproduction by individuals with ostensibly superior traits."
"it would simply slow the rate at which the unintelligent breed, while encouraging the intelligent to breed at a higher rate."
"We should be as charitable to the unfortunate as our circumstances permit, but we should not assist those with hereditary mental deficiencies to incapacitate their descendants."
What was the name of the writer of these revolting sentences? Robert Klark Graham?
I finished watching it this morning. The main gist of the interview was the debunking of the graphene theory. Scoglio is somebody I was almost completely unaware of, as I mentioned. The original and truthful of the truth tellers are usually the most invisible, for obvious reasons. It led me to: https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/31/phantom-virus-in-search-of-sars-cov-2/. Which was a pretty early expose’ of the whole question of id’ing of the CD19 virus, particularly the use of the PCR test and is actually one-of the best descriptions of the PCR fraud that I’ve read. I haven’t been able to find out how he died, yet. It does seem very convenient, as usual.
Maybe it’s not a conspiracy at all. It’s just caring people doing things they think will help. However, unintended consequences cause things to go bat shit haywire?
I'm chuckling now as I retrospectively interpret that Jamie Raskin spat on Kovid Kongress Theater.
And Kirsch of course having Jay and Kulldorff at the MIT Spat.
And Jay shows up on Ron DeSantis with Evergreen and this whole fake feud with Fauci.
All staged, me thinks.
All Pro Wrestling.
To position the next set of Trusted Experts picking one issue, (treatments! just jab the olds! lockdowns bad!) and still co-signing the fake pandemic and the need for countermeasures. To "protect" the people they need to get rid of. Off the rock.
That was fun at the end.
That 2008 paper is pretty significative. That's the last year of Bush Dubya and the year when Hope was elected and people got Obama in a very fast switcheroo. No one noticed!
I remember financial people were saying then things like "well, look at the marvel that is the iPhone! Computers always get better and cheaper! why that doesn't ever happen in college, transportation, healthcare, etc."
And they were complaining precisely about the conclusion of this paper: Demographics swamp the effects of the most impressive technological developments.
BULLSHIT!!!
Everyone knows it's a huge lie. If energy was cheaper everything else would become better and cheaper.
If energy was cheaper, disease would really be prevented.
If energy was cheaper, cures would really happen.
Computers get cheaper and better because they are produced in countries of dirt-cheap energy.
That's the main variable. Demographics is a façade.
They tanked the economy then too.
And in 2009, Klaus was warning about all manner of "global crisis" to come.
Tulsi parroted all of this in her Vote for Joe speech.
They planned out everything. It's unreal. I did not start out here. I just started out studying the shots!
I have no doubt that McCain would have tanked the economy too.
Perhaps he would have invaded Iran and Russia with the sales pitch of restoring the economy. If the people are not fooled by candidate A they will be fooled by candidate B. Programs may vary about 0.2%, but everything else is a continuation of everything.
I now think it makes no sense to blame Trump voters just like it made no sense to blame Obama voters.
according to wikispooks she's one of the WEF's Young Global Leaders (2015) - https://wikispooks.com/wiki/WEF/Young_Global_Leaders/2015
Great work Sage. Perhaps your best work to date.
It's a long and tedious task.
How far back does it go? They were in Charge in 45.
Rand background:
~On May 14, 1948, Project RAND—an organization formed immediately after World War II to connect military planning with research and development decisions—separated from the Douglas Aircraft Company of Santa Monica, California, and became an independent, nonprofit organization. Adopting its name from a contraction of the term Research AND Development, the newly formed entity was dedicated to furthering and promoting scientific, educational, and charitable purposes for the public welfare and security of the United States.
Almost at once, RAND developed a unique style. It blended scrupulous nonpartisanship with rigorous, fact-based analysis to tackle society's most pressing problems. Over time, RAND assembled a unique corps of researchers, notable not only for their individual skills but also for their commitment to interdisciplinary cooperation. By the 1960s, RAND was bringing its trademark mode of empirical, nonpartisan, independent analysis to the study of many urgent domestic social and economic problems. In subsequent decades, RAND extended its focus beyond the United States with the goal of making individuals, communities, and nations safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. ~
Reads like a comedy eh?
With all the new talent inherited from WWII what better way to lift mankind to unimaginable heights.
UFB.
In a secret directive circulated on September 3, 1946, President Truman officially approved Operation Paperclip and expanded it to include 1,000 German scientists under "temporary, limited military custody".[8][9][10] News media revealed the program as early as December 1946.[11]
How far back does it go…
I think I mostly wonder if there was a start
🔥 💣 🔥 💣 🔥
Satanic Science founded on spiderwebs and batshit. The fog isn’t nearly dense enough any longer to hide Baal’s outline. Slamming its slaves into the matrix with both fists to broadside the stunned herd.
2017 Study: The legalization of medical assistance in dying will affect health care spending in Canada. Our aim was to determine the potential costs and savings associated with the implementation of medical assistance in dying. 80% of patients will have cancer; 50% of patients will be aged 60–80 years. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/3/E101
RESULTS: Medical assistance in dying could reduce annual health care spending across Canada by between $34.7 million and $138.8 million, exceeding the $1.5–$14.8 million in direct costs associated with its implementation.
And so we observe the Sleepers walk off the Edge, cheering and gesturing MAGAMAHA spells.
Etch-a-sketch art meets mind therapy. Gone to split wood.
"I see this plain as day right now and I didn’t even spend time in the federal government or the Rand Satan Corporation or go to Harvard or Yale or Stanford or MIT." Sage Hana
That's WHY you see it plain as day.
Because no one made sausage out of your brain in any one of the meat prestigious packing houses.
SH: I see this plain as day right now and I didn’t even spend time in the federal government or the Rand Satan Corporation or go to Harvard or Yale or Stanford or MIT.
Me: I believe that this line should read "I see this plain as day right now because I didn’t spend time in the federal government or the Rand Satan Corporation or go to Harvard or Yale or Stanford or MIT".
IMHO the psyop of psyops is emphasize differences, encourage inside "group member" discussions using insider hidden meaning to the words used (like conspiracy theorist), project mockingbird media use of "the new meaning" of the same old words encouraging being hip or in the know or special. This is just the tip of the iceberg regarding implementations off divide and conquer.
Your version of the sentence shows exactly what they create emotionally = "I am not like you" which complicates things by bringing feelings into the discussion which is neither good or bad by itself but can cause an avoidance of complicated ideas. Just give me the emotional thrill but hold the long discussion. So armadillos and chimichangas replace "is self psychology really worth the effort?" *grins*
Then throw in Pavlovian conditioning from advertising mostly to brainwash people into thinking they can earn more money and things they want but don't have by being in a club and voila, you get a company of workers that are incompetent at getting people to pay for their services and a new government assisted business that does not have to please customers. They can get the government bureaucrats to take the money from people, whether the people like it or not and pay the workers to do something the common person would never pay for.
How do I get you to give to me? Let me count the ways.......
This is just the tip of the iceberg. It's been going on for a long time. Parasitic divide and conquer. Free thinkers who are paying attention are not allowed in the "approved clubs". Just reward is good" and "punishment is bad" binary thinkers only, thank you. If you do get in to check the place out remember to leave any ethics and morals at the door where they will not offend binary sensibilities.
Done riffing for now.
Dr. Rima Laibow, MD, describes in her Substack this week how her father was "murdered" in a hospital in Florida in 2010. She says that what the hospital did was made legal by ObamaCare: "March 23, 2010, it became a matter of national policy...the Affordable Care Act...did what the UK just did, what Canada is doing and what country after country is doing in keeping with yet another part of the United Nations’ diabolical Malthusian Management scheme, better known as the “Sustainable Development Goals.” https://substack.com/home/post/p-152298451
From James Hill, MD: Kumbaya. https://hillmd.substack.com/p/next-nih-director-dr-jay-bhattacharya?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-564be293-3914-4945-9c3b-eec2c0831e84
Yup. By the numbers.
Hero Ball, Dolts Botching Shit, Kumbaya.
Calm the marks. Pacification and Control.
---
This is a full service boutique.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/hero-ball-dolts-botching-shit-kumbaya
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/pacification-and-control
Get your popcorn as AI has written us a new banger about cancer, specifically.
The Cancerous Conundrum
In the halls of power, a secret lies concealed,
A cure for cancer, yet withheld from all.
The Rockefeller Institute holds the key,
But chooses silence; a sinister call.
"Let them perish," they whisper in dark rooms,
"For overpopulation's looming threat."
Withholding knowledge as their twisted tool,
They let the masses suffer and fret.
Yet some dare to challenge this cruel decree,
Independent minds with a noble quest:
To unveil the truth and set it free,
No matter the powerful elite's protest.
The cure, they say, will see the light of day,
Despite suppression's heavy hand.
For in their hearts they know it's wrong to stay silent,
While people suffer across every land.
But for now, the powerful have their way,
Letting cancer ravage without a fight.
A twisted logic to keep death at bay,
Their solution—a most sinister sight.
So let us expose this vile conspiracy,
And bring the cure to those who need it most.
For knowledge shared is power truly free,
And in its light, we'll conquer cancer's host.
Eugenics is a word we inherited from our ancestors the Greeks.
It means “wellborn.”
Eu - the first syllable translates as “good”.
Genics - the second syllable translates as “born”.
The term eugenics was coined in the 1880s'.
a. Eugenics is the practice, advocacy and study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. The purpose is to improve the human species by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. It aims to reduce human suffering by “breeding out” disease, disabilities and so-called undesirable characteristics from the human population.
b. Early supporters of eugenics believed people inherited mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions could be bred out of the gene pool. It was a social and political philosophy, based loosely on Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory and Francis Galton’s research on hereditary genius, that seeks to eradicate genetic defects and improve the genetic makeup of populations through selective human breeding.
c. Eugenics is directed toward promoting reproduction by individuals with ostensibly superior traits.
d. Eugenics is: Intelligent Selection and it alone offers man an opportunity never given to any other species— a chance to transcend the limitations and cruelties of the natural selection which shaped his destiny for so long.
e. Intelligent selection is the means whereby the more intelligent people will bring more of their kind into the world. Instead of killing off the unfit at an early age, as primitive natural selection did, it would simply slow the rate at which the unintelligent breed, while encouraging the intelligent to breed at a higher rate. This is an elementary procedure in the science of husbandry, yet when humans seek to apply it to themselves, they are confronted by a mass of altruistic emotions and attitudes inherited from our distant past. Only lack of understanding or downright inertia prevents man from benefiting from his own greatest discovery.
f. Eugenics has nothing to do with murdering anyone.
Negative Eugenics
It is not that childbearing should be off limits to unintelligent people. This would only be justified in such extreme cases as persistent criminality and incurable and uncontrollable hereditary diseases. It is simply that the reproduction of the less useful members of society should not be encouraged and subsidized. More important, they should not be prevented from obtaining information about contraception. We should be as charitable to the unfortunate as our circumstances permit, but we should not assist those with hereditary mental deficiencies to incapacitate their descendants. If we continue to do so, Homo sapiens will become increasingly less sapient. Simple devices and precautions which enable those with transmittable defects to control their reproduction are now widely available. We must see that the unfortunate ones know about and are encouraged to use contraceptive techniques. Whereas negative eugenics is directed toward preventing reproduction by individuals with traits that are considered to be undesirable.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The battlefield is language.
He writes this in his introduction!!!!! The beastly man.......
"To my children, in whom I see myself reborn and, thanks to their mother, perceptibly im-
proved."
Just for the fun of it ... please elaborate on this theme.
"increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable."
"promoting reproduction by individuals with ostensibly superior traits."
"it would simply slow the rate at which the unintelligent breed, while encouraging the intelligent to breed at a higher rate."
"We should be as charitable to the unfortunate as our circumstances permit, but we should not assist those with hereditary mental deficiencies to incapacitate their descendants."
What was the name of the writer of these revolting sentences? Robert Klark Graham?
All life is sacred.
Intelligence is knowing this.
Thank you for the reply.
I suspected that it was not sarcasm.
Good day.
This is off-topic, but apparently Dr. Stefano Scoglio died!! (Outspoken microbiologist, homeopath, co-author of Virusmania).
And I can't find anywhere online that actually mentions the cause...
Do you have a link to him, Pamela? I know I saw him recently in a vid or an article, but he’s not somebody I was following regularly.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-151502416?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thank you Cyrillic Jill! I’ve watched half of that and it is very interesting. I’ll get to the other half tomorrow.
I don't think I watched the whole thing - maybe part, awhile ago.
Because I don't care for Coppolino, he's very weird.
I finished watching it this morning. The main gist of the interview was the debunking of the graphene theory. Scoglio is somebody I was almost completely unaware of, as I mentioned. The original and truthful of the truth tellers are usually the most invisible, for obvious reasons. It led me to: https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/31/phantom-virus-in-search-of-sars-cov-2/. Which was a pretty early expose’ of the whole question of id’ing of the CD19 virus, particularly the use of the PCR test and is actually one-of the best descriptions of the PCR fraud that I’ve read. I haven’t been able to find out how he died, yet. It does seem very convenient, as usual.
I don't think he's weird, it's just the Italian in him 😀
This on his theory about "spike proteins."
https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Dr-Stefano-Scoglio-and-Torsten-Engelbrecht-Nov-2022:2
I liked Scoglio very much!
It's Coppolino who I find difficult.
He was one of the first to point out that the ides of l "spike protein" is a farse
Maybe it’s not a conspiracy at all. It’s just caring people doing things they think will help. However, unintended consequences cause things to go bat shit haywire?
"Conspiracy" is a thought terminating cliche.
The world runs on conspiracy.
Will bust out a quick post on this.
MAHA!💉🫠
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/huxleys-ultimate-revolution-the-battle
Narrator: "It was not a coincidence."
I never thought it was.