Kary Mullis #1: Now deceased PCR Test Inventor discusses its limitations. 3:42 video.
Promo Code: cassiopea64
Wayback Machine link to removed YouTube video.
Going to leave this for the STEMS to educate us all about PCR Tests.
Who is Kary Mullis?
From Spookipedia, and you can see why we call it Spookipedia.
Kary Mullis was a problem for the People who Own the World.
Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his role in the invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. PCR became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR."
Mullis also downplayed humans' role in climate change and expressed doubts that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS. He also expressed a belief in the paranormal. Mullis' work in advocating for topics completely unrelated to his Nobel Prize has been cited as an example of the trend known as the 'Nobel disease'.
More about Mullis from Charles’s post.
I just re-stacked this with this excerpt from the transcription.
Said Kary Mullis:
"Empirical scientist (sic) is something that can be done in front of other people. You can show it on a stage. I can do my experiment in front of anybody who was interested. We should all agree on the results. We don't have to worry about why."
Read the above about 50-times.
Open study. Results that can be replicated.
We don’t have that.
We have Thought Leaders and Experts.
And computer models.
We have massive massive corruption of Science up and down every chain involved.
Made me think of Rojo Pants and his 100-samples.
You have a Scientific Method.
It requires conflict and openness.
Let's duplicate with vials from all over the world.
What might we find?
When the Minders made the shots possession of the DOD and we don't have complete transparency..."SCIENCE WOULD BE FALSIFIED" said the Day Tapes.
Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting that some scientific research data could be - and indeed has been - falsified in order to bring about desired results. And here was said, "People don't ask the right questions. Some people are too trusting."
Now this was an interesting statement because the speaker and the audience all being doctors of medicine and supposedly very objectively, dispassionately scientific and science being the be all and end-all ... well to falsify scientific research data in that setting is like blasphemy in the church ... you just don't do that.
Anyhow, out of all of this was to come the New International Governing Body, probably to come through the U.N . and with a World Court, but not necessarily through those structures. It could be brought about in other ways. Acceptance of the U.N . at that time was seen as not being as wide as was hoped. Efforts would continue to give the United Nations increasing importance. People would be more and more used to the idea of relinquishing some national sovereignty.
Do you understand?
I will keep re-printing this. This is the Op.
This is the Op.
This is the Op.
This is the Op.
This is the Op right now.
They are falsifying the Science.
You know this.
I think the STEMS know it. I think they are going along to have a nice life.
And because they don’t want that world to be lost to them.
Or they don’t want to admit that they got duped.
Or…they believe in the objectives of their Rockefeller Friends and think “tough choices have to be made.”
Never re-visit the decision.
Will probably have more Mullis later.