I was wondering if some of our clothing might have toxic chemicals in them and possible cause cancer. Bras might be causing breast cancer. If their are toxins in our foods they are probably in everything we eat and use!
Around 30 years ago people were falling very ill and dying in Spain with very strange symptoms. It was blamed on industrial oil which had been cleaned up and sold as cooking oil in local markets. A doctor spoke out saying it was caused by pesticides. He was later killed in mysterious circumstances. He believed it was organophosphate poisoning caused by agricultural workers in a certain region who could not read the instructions and had mixed up dangerous doses of the stuff.
I learned that a book had been written detailing what had happened but it was unavailable, the only copy being in the British Library. Through our local library I made a request to read it. It duly arrived, a small little book which could be read in a couple of hours. I had to read it in the library.
This little book was in two parts and the second chapter interested me far more. It was about a French nuclear power plant at Cap de la Hague, situated in Normandy, right on the coast. It was very detailed and had charts showing human and animal cancers at different radii and contamination of shellfish and the radiation of seawater.
Several years later a French TV station showed a documentary about Cap de la Hague. It was in a shocking state with concrete falling off the outside walls and men being sent into the plant to clean up and coming out contaminated, falling ill and getting no compensation. I wrote the the TV company, asking for a copy of the film and they replied they did not have any record of it!
I live in this radius and later on a I met a lady on the beach who was grief stricken as her little daughter had a very strange cancer and she told me there were several others in the hospital with cancer too and no one knew why. What a surprise.
In the eighties my son was treated by a doctor who had been the medical officer of health for a huge area of Germany. She warned me not to get involved in the organophosphate industry as it was dangerous and above all, not to get involved in with the nuclear industry as it was very, very dangerous. I was still that sweet summer child and did not understand what she was telling me but I was soon to find out.
Your post brought back many memories. Thank you Sage!
In the spirit of asking the right questions, I ask the following: Is cancer a real disease?
My answer to this provocative question is: yes, it is a disease.
But there's more to it. The interesting question is: what is a disease?
The attempts to define that word often include a misleading term: "abnormal."
For example, a common definition of disease would be: an abnormal physiological state that causes pain or disability in an animal or a plant, and this state is not due to mechanical injury, like a bone fracture.
So, a bone fracture is painful, but it is not a disease, because... what? because it is excluded from the definition.
But the use of the word "abnormal" is misleading because it pushes the idea that something weird is happening. And yet, cancer is perfectly normal.
One view of cancer is that it is a normal physiologic response to some forms of damage. The body tries to isolate the toxins or the parasites in one place, and wall it from the rest of the body. The toxins may come from the outside, or may be produced inside, as tissue decays.
But, normally, if circulation is good enough and the liver works fine, and other elimination routes work fine, then cancer should not be formed. The abnormality of cancer is not the tumor itself, but the impairment of the primary ways of elimination of toxins.
And this impairment is to be expected in 90+ people, but in 20 year-olds is very suspicious.
Perhaps it can be that the people who promote this view of cancer as a fallback mechanism of survival for an organism that is overwhelmed by toxins of any source are giving too much importance to the detoxification mechanisms, and too little importance to the injuries caused by radiation and chemicals.
The most abnormal thing is to pretend that gaslighting people into believing that their diseases are their fault for allowing themselves to become intoxicated, when, in reality, people are like trees and flowers in that we can do very little to oppose the damage done by toxins and radiation, which are everywhere and they are going up, not down.
But then there is the psychological aspect. Or mental aspect.
The real reason to do something as gross as denying the reality of cancer is really a desperate attempt at helping people. Due to ideological constraints, some people believe that any disease becomes worse when one enters into a mental state of victimhood. Also known as victim mentality or victim consciousness. And refusing to "be a victim" should grant the person a better chance at overcoming the disease.
This tactic is doomed to fail because of its internal contradictions.
But there is some truth to it. It's best for people to do whatever they can to keep their spirit up no matter what happens to them. I think that is the hidden truth of stoicism and epicureanism, which is often overlooked.
I think it is probably the case that they oversell cancer as a disease to create the hopelessness issue, which is what produces the mentality of giving up, and that creates the perfect consumer of medical procedures and tests and treatments, which is what really kills people en masse.
Because killing billions is not such a good business. It's a much better business to do both the killing and earning huge profits with false treatments for diseases that probably have an easy cure, censored by the mean bastard bolsheviks at google and youtube and wikipedia.
And that is one of the reasons I hate socialdemocracy: it's a system that enables the cullers to increase consumer base (free health care) and increases the marginal profit (oligopoly means there is no competition, which is optimal to increase profits.)
The number of toxins we are exposed to today is endless. If you really want to know about cancer causes and prevention/treatment, watch this video from 1973. World Without Cancer
> The most widely accepted model posits that the incidence of cancers due to ionizing radiation increases linearly with effective radiation dose at a rate of 5.5% per sievert;[1]
if correct, natural background radiation is the most hazardous source of radiation to general public health,
followed by medical imaging as a close second.[citation needed] Additionally, the vast majority of non-invasive cancers are non-melanoma skin cancers caused by ultraviolet radiation (which lies on the boundary between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation).
Dr. Lynn Margulis challenged the above contention (quoted here again)
if correct, natural background radiation is the most hazardous source of radiation to general public health,
Dr. Margulis (deceased) notes that life on Earth has evolved for the last 3+ billion years. Life solved the problem of ionizing radiation long ago, or there would be no life.
Thus that statement in my mind is nonsense, unless our health and cellular integrity are severely degraded by 80,000 + chemicals pouring into our Air, Water, Soil, and Food every day. In which case Bayer Monsanto, Dow, Union Carbide and a host of other Chem and petroleum companies, not to mention the Banks that make the money available to poison life on Earth should all be working at Love Canal and East Palestine Ohio and many others cleaning it up without pay. Or any health considerations.
Remember when you were a kid. Your parents told you, “You made the mess, you clean it up. Good enough for kids why not the criminal captains of industry.
Imagine a world with no cancer and no heart disease. Now imagine the world of medicine. It wouldn't exist beyond a few scattered health centers. Your doctors would be out of work or poor and pig pharma would cease to exist. Most people would suffer mental breakdowns knowing their favorite past time, being sick, diseased and drugged, was no longer an option to die for.
I've read thru this one a few times and keep seeing more. Great post.
My grandfather died (before I was born) in his 30's of cancer (non-Hodgkin lymphoma) years after being in the military at Los Alamos, NM during the "Trinity" atomic bomb test. Manhattan Project.
Interesting to consider everything about IVM being foisted into our brain vectors early on, causing a ruckus. Now cancers skyrocketing & IVM anti cancer talk.
Something to take like a supplement as time goes by.
Radiation or poison exposure/ damage. Then, years later... different cancers. Over and over.
Nice picture of Arthur Godfrey in cigarette ad. Radio personality with great voice.
In one book on Nicolai Tesler, who invented alternating current to the chagrin of Tom Edison's Direct current, he had a dream as a youth of building a generator at Niagra falls, which came true
His patents was stolen by the FBI at his death and now used as a directed energy weapon off the ionosphere a la Maui Hawaii today.
These dumps are everywhere. Everything is down stream of something. This site is one I have a had some personal connection to when I moved to this general area of Indiana. Housing subdivisions were located adjacent to this site. Parks and softball fields, too.
Incidents of cancers within families, young families, which no history of cancer prior were and ARE being documented.
Of course, state and federal agencies did and continue to ‘botch shit’. It was steered away from being labeled a EPA Supersite by Senator Luger IIRC, but I’m sure other state politicians played a role as well to minimize impact to those responsible for the toxic shit dumped and to maximize it to the communities involved.
It’s all in the article. They play all kinds of games like drilling ground water surveillance wells nowhere near the actual site to get the readings they want, yet shrug when a 27 yr old female in the zone gets breast cancer.
Murdering the world is hard. They do try though. For money. For fun. For Gaia. For Satan.
Whoever and whatever. They get it done and the guppies are left rotting in an early death.
Strange syncronicity here... wouldn't have clogged ur blog with it , if it weren't for the mention of a benzene/cancer connection in the Love Canal EPA section.
I clicked thru to this pdf yesterday, by 1960's era author Chan Thomas:
It makes total sense that we have parasites. I do believe they are responsible for some ailments and maybe some cancer. We think we are so modern that we don’t have them. That being said there are natural protocols to cleanse without ivermectin. Our ancestors probably periodically ate them as a matter of rituals passed down we have lost.
This is a superb post. Thank you!
I was wondering if some of our clothing might have toxic chemicals in them and possible cause cancer. Bras might be causing breast cancer. If their are toxins in our foods they are probably in everything we eat and use!
Around 30 years ago people were falling very ill and dying in Spain with very strange symptoms. It was blamed on industrial oil which had been cleaned up and sold as cooking oil in local markets. A doctor spoke out saying it was caused by pesticides. He was later killed in mysterious circumstances. He believed it was organophosphate poisoning caused by agricultural workers in a certain region who could not read the instructions and had mixed up dangerous doses of the stuff.
I learned that a book had been written detailing what had happened but it was unavailable, the only copy being in the British Library. Through our local library I made a request to read it. It duly arrived, a small little book which could be read in a couple of hours. I had to read it in the library.
This little book was in two parts and the second chapter interested me far more. It was about a French nuclear power plant at Cap de la Hague, situated in Normandy, right on the coast. It was very detailed and had charts showing human and animal cancers at different radii and contamination of shellfish and the radiation of seawater.
Several years later a French TV station showed a documentary about Cap de la Hague. It was in a shocking state with concrete falling off the outside walls and men being sent into the plant to clean up and coming out contaminated, falling ill and getting no compensation. I wrote the the TV company, asking for a copy of the film and they replied they did not have any record of it!
I live in this radius and later on a I met a lady on the beach who was grief stricken as her little daughter had a very strange cancer and she told me there were several others in the hospital with cancer too and no one knew why. What a surprise.
In the eighties my son was treated by a doctor who had been the medical officer of health for a huge area of Germany. She warned me not to get involved in the organophosphate industry as it was dangerous and above all, not to get involved in with the nuclear industry as it was very, very dangerous. I was still that sweet summer child and did not understand what she was telling me but I was soon to find out.
Your post brought back many memories. Thank you Sage!
Go to 45:20 for the unveiling of a real pandemic.
It's wise to leave your morals at the door.
Better yet abandon them altogether.
And I quote; "there may be a moral obligation to augment people"
Yah right, the moral of the story is "There's too many peeps".
https://rumble.com/v4p9fj5-dawn-of-a-new-paradigm-of-augmenting-humans-of-mavenlavender-ai-killbox.html
Any thoughts on the Middle Eastern kabuki theatre? Is this a prelude? Who was actually terrorized today?
In the spirit of asking the right questions, I ask the following: Is cancer a real disease?
My answer to this provocative question is: yes, it is a disease.
But there's more to it. The interesting question is: what is a disease?
The attempts to define that word often include a misleading term: "abnormal."
For example, a common definition of disease would be: an abnormal physiological state that causes pain or disability in an animal or a plant, and this state is not due to mechanical injury, like a bone fracture.
So, a bone fracture is painful, but it is not a disease, because... what? because it is excluded from the definition.
But the use of the word "abnormal" is misleading because it pushes the idea that something weird is happening. And yet, cancer is perfectly normal.
One view of cancer is that it is a normal physiologic response to some forms of damage. The body tries to isolate the toxins or the parasites in one place, and wall it from the rest of the body. The toxins may come from the outside, or may be produced inside, as tissue decays.
But, normally, if circulation is good enough and the liver works fine, and other elimination routes work fine, then cancer should not be formed. The abnormality of cancer is not the tumor itself, but the impairment of the primary ways of elimination of toxins.
And this impairment is to be expected in 90+ people, but in 20 year-olds is very suspicious.
Perhaps it can be that the people who promote this view of cancer as a fallback mechanism of survival for an organism that is overwhelmed by toxins of any source are giving too much importance to the detoxification mechanisms, and too little importance to the injuries caused by radiation and chemicals.
The most abnormal thing is to pretend that gaslighting people into believing that their diseases are their fault for allowing themselves to become intoxicated, when, in reality, people are like trees and flowers in that we can do very little to oppose the damage done by toxins and radiation, which are everywhere and they are going up, not down.
But then there is the psychological aspect. Or mental aspect.
The real reason to do something as gross as denying the reality of cancer is really a desperate attempt at helping people. Due to ideological constraints, some people believe that any disease becomes worse when one enters into a mental state of victimhood. Also known as victim mentality or victim consciousness. And refusing to "be a victim" should grant the person a better chance at overcoming the disease.
This tactic is doomed to fail because of its internal contradictions.
But there is some truth to it. It's best for people to do whatever they can to keep their spirit up no matter what happens to them. I think that is the hidden truth of stoicism and epicureanism, which is often overlooked.
I think it is probably the case that they oversell cancer as a disease to create the hopelessness issue, which is what produces the mentality of giving up, and that creates the perfect consumer of medical procedures and tests and treatments, which is what really kills people en masse.
Because killing billions is not such a good business. It's a much better business to do both the killing and earning huge profits with false treatments for diseases that probably have an easy cure, censored by the mean bastard bolsheviks at google and youtube and wikipedia.
And that is one of the reasons I hate socialdemocracy: it's a system that enables the cullers to increase consumer base (free health care) and increases the marginal profit (oligopoly means there is no competition, which is optimal to increase profits.)
The number of toxins we are exposed to today is endless. If you really want to know about cancer causes and prevention/treatment, watch this video from 1973. World Without Cancer
https://rumble.com/v4nb9w2-world-without-cancer-video.html
The Netflix shite trailer is really something. I will (well, I won't, but I would) bet that they could get away with a comedy about the genocide in Gaza. Starring Ben Nitay as Mr Bibi. Or something. Oh look...https://www.jpost.com/israel/who-is-ben-nitay-and-why-does-he-look-so-much-like-binyamin-netanyahu Can we say "fuck" here? Can I? Hanna? Miss? Please? Yes?
Good day Sage,
Awesome work.
> The most widely accepted model posits that the incidence of cancers due to ionizing radiation increases linearly with effective radiation dose at a rate of 5.5% per sievert;[1]
if correct, natural background radiation is the most hazardous source of radiation to general public health,
followed by medical imaging as a close second.[citation needed] Additionally, the vast majority of non-invasive cancers are non-melanoma skin cancers caused by ultraviolet radiation (which lies on the boundary between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation).
Dr. Lynn Margulis challenged the above contention (quoted here again)
if correct, natural background radiation is the most hazardous source of radiation to general public health,
Dr. Margulis (deceased) notes that life on Earth has evolved for the last 3+ billion years. Life solved the problem of ionizing radiation long ago, or there would be no life.
Thus that statement in my mind is nonsense, unless our health and cellular integrity are severely degraded by 80,000 + chemicals pouring into our Air, Water, Soil, and Food every day. In which case Bayer Monsanto, Dow, Union Carbide and a host of other Chem and petroleum companies, not to mention the Banks that make the money available to poison life on Earth should all be working at Love Canal and East Palestine Ohio and many others cleaning it up without pay. Or any health considerations.
Remember when you were a kid. Your parents told you, “You made the mess, you clean it up. Good enough for kids why not the criminal captains of industry.
Imagine a world with no cancer and no heart disease. Now imagine the world of medicine. It wouldn't exist beyond a few scattered health centers. Your doctors would be out of work or poor and pig pharma would cease to exist. Most people would suffer mental breakdowns knowing their favorite past time, being sick, diseased and drugged, was no longer an option to die for.
I've read thru this one a few times and keep seeing more. Great post.
My grandfather died (before I was born) in his 30's of cancer (non-Hodgkin lymphoma) years after being in the military at Los Alamos, NM during the "Trinity" atomic bomb test. Manhattan Project.
Interesting to consider everything about IVM being foisted into our brain vectors early on, causing a ruckus. Now cancers skyrocketing & IVM anti cancer talk.
Something to take like a supplement as time goes by.
Radiation or poison exposure/ damage. Then, years later... different cancers. Over and over.
Nice picture of Arthur Godfrey in cigarette ad. Radio personality with great voice.
In one book on Nicolai Tesler, who invented alternating current to the chagrin of Tom Edison's Direct current, he had a dream as a youth of building a generator at Niagra falls, which came true
His patents was stolen by the FBI at his death and now used as a directed energy weapon off the ionosphere a la Maui Hawaii today.
Love Canal was only the first and most visible.
https://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/27/us/24-concerns-to-clean-up-waste-dump-in-indiana.html
These dumps are everywhere. Everything is down stream of something. This site is one I have a had some personal connection to when I moved to this general area of Indiana. Housing subdivisions were located adjacent to this site. Parks and softball fields, too.
Incidents of cancers within families, young families, which no history of cancer prior were and ARE being documented.
Of course, state and federal agencies did and continue to ‘botch shit’. It was steered away from being labeled a EPA Supersite by Senator Luger IIRC, but I’m sure other state politicians played a role as well to minimize impact to those responsible for the toxic shit dumped and to maximize it to the communities involved.
It’s all in the article. They play all kinds of games like drilling ground water surveillance wells nowhere near the actual site to get the readings they want, yet shrug when a 27 yr old female in the zone gets breast cancer.
Murdering the world is hard. They do try though. For money. For fun. For Gaia. For Satan.
Whoever and whatever. They get it done and the guppies are left rotting in an early death.
Sage -
Strange syncronicity here... wouldn't have clogged ur blog with it , if it weren't for the mention of a benzene/cancer connection in the Love Canal EPA section.
I clicked thru to this pdf yesterday, by 1960's era author Chan Thomas:
"We Are the Killers"
https://archive.org/details/1966-we-are-the-killers
The title is somewhat click-bait, and the "book" very McLuhanesque,
but I couldn't not share the link, after reading the benzene/cancer commentary in your post
Amazing post! 🔥❤️
It makes total sense that we have parasites. I do believe they are responsible for some ailments and maybe some cancer. We think we are so modern that we don’t have them. That being said there are natural protocols to cleanse without ivermectin. Our ancestors probably periodically ate them as a matter of rituals passed down we have lost.