Oct 29, 2022·edited Oct 29, 2022Liked by Sage Hana
GPS was invented and used in Vietnam in the early 1960’s. The science was not introduced to the general public until the late 1990’s. DARPA technology is usually at least 40 years ahead of the accepted science at any given time. Annie Jacobsons book “The Pentagons Brain” documents DARPA’s history meticulously.
well the nanotech is not alone its merged with synthetic parasites which can reproduce. and there is quantum dot as well... and that still doesnt explain all the other sharp structures they are all crystals? hmm
My feeling is that we're looking at something which doesn't act the same way in very intricate complicated and miraculous human bodies as the globocorp billionaire twits were sold it would from all their pretty science fiction teen fantasies. On the good side it would mean the human body is more resilient to becoming trans human or whatever than they would like it to be. On the bad side it would mean they were openly experimenting on the human population of the Earth with no consideration for repercussions. Those that die on their way to becoming their humanoid movie fantasies (which can't and won't happen) just add to their depopulation fantasies. You gotta break some eggs right?
Thank you Sage! Whenever I find myself in dark, far-flung rabbit holes I warn myself that nothing is ever exactly as it seems, good or bad. Confirmation bias can be just as dangerous to truth-seekers as to sheeple. Stay frosty and keep your head on a swivel.
Dr. Kevin McCairn has already analysed samples and shown the nanotech stuff to be bunkum. Focus on the spike protein. Nanotech and the viruses don't exist crowd are just distractions.
Whatever is going on. The more people put out videos that shout Something is going ON! Whether they figured it out or not is sure better than saying zero. The more the better. Everyone to the table. I still have friends that believe the vaxx doesn’t kill people, no matter what proof I send.
What about all of the heavy metals also found in the vaccines? Lead, aluminum, cadmium, cesium, gadolinium, magnetic beads, etc. I have videos of my friends who can still stick a spoon to the site where they were injected 6 months ago.
We are in the realm of theorizing about something which is being held at arms length. Samples and analysis to date has only been conducted on a handful of vials, and the study has not been standardized.
There is a dearth of data.
The inability to study this and unwillingness by the powers that be to let it be studied should be a red flag for anyone looking at this. If these things are “safe and effective”, then there should be no issue with examining the contents. Further, as products of tax dollars, these things should be subject to public scrutiny and adhere to legal requirements and basic manufacturing standards.
Reprising my comment from yesterday, with slight modification:
Without a good cross-lot comparative randomized study of vial contents with multiple researchers investigating independently, I would offer that it’s impossible to say with any confidence what is in the jab. Without parallel independent research and some standardized method of study, it is unreasonable to draw conclusions about what is being observed.
The data source is both not representative and too small.
The examination of the vial contents needs to compare and cross-reference not only microscopy, but chemical and biological analysis, including spectrometry for composition and sanger sequencing for genomic data.
Commentary offered, which is enlightening and useful, should reasonably be heard as informed opinion and not conclusive. This also does not mean the commentary is false. There is simply not enough data or study to draw conclusions.
GPS was invented and used in Vietnam in the early 1960’s. The science was not introduced to the general public until the late 1990’s. DARPA technology is usually at least 40 years ahead of the accepted science at any given time. Annie Jacobsons book “The Pentagons Brain” documents DARPA’s history meticulously.
It was a damn good discussion. Wish I wasn’t late to the comments.
I learned a lot, but that doesn’t necessarily mean I’m throwing anything out, yet. Just rearranging my rankings spreadsheet.
My real concern is ‘Where are tamales represented? Who speaks for tamales?’ We cannot continue to ignore this.
No one outside of DARPA knows what they have. Not even the Science Analyst.
well the nanotech is not alone its merged with synthetic parasites which can reproduce. and there is quantum dot as well... and that still doesnt explain all the other sharp structures they are all crystals? hmm
My feeling is that we're looking at something which doesn't act the same way in very intricate complicated and miraculous human bodies as the globocorp billionaire twits were sold it would from all their pretty science fiction teen fantasies. On the good side it would mean the human body is more resilient to becoming trans human or whatever than they would like it to be. On the bad side it would mean they were openly experimenting on the human population of the Earth with no consideration for repercussions. Those that die on their way to becoming their humanoid movie fantasies (which can't and won't happen) just add to their depopulation fantasies. You gotta break some eggs right?
Thank you Sage! Whenever I find myself in dark, far-flung rabbit holes I warn myself that nothing is ever exactly as it seems, good or bad. Confirmation bias can be just as dangerous to truth-seekers as to sheeple. Stay frosty and keep your head on a swivel.
Why is anyone still acting like graphene oxide and nanotechnology doesn’t exist?
https://news.gsu.edu/2021/05/03/intranasal-influenza-vaccine-enhances-immune-response-and-offers-broad-protection-biomedical-sciences-researchers-find/
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210330005388/en/INBRAIN-Neuroelectronics-Secures-17-Million-in-Series-A-Funding-for-First-AI-Powered-Graphene-Brain-Interface
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agt2.18
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31739981/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.200306136
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167583/
Humble submission for a Halloween special.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/dozens-suffer-cardiac-arrest-others-trampled-south-korean-halloween-celebration-video-warning-graphic/
Probably nothing. Seems like I hear things like this out of Korea all the time. Kids got too excited.
I just thought of something…
The original vidya the Doc says he’s viewing this nano structure @200x power.
Looks pretty big for nano.
I’m having scale issues.
Dr. Flurm? Check my maffs
Dr. Kevin McCairn has already analysed samples and shown the nanotech stuff to be bunkum. Focus on the spike protein. Nanotech and the viruses don't exist crowd are just distractions.
Whatever is going on. The more people put out videos that shout Something is going ON! Whether they figured it out or not is sure better than saying zero. The more the better. Everyone to the table. I still have friends that believe the vaxx doesn’t kill people, no matter what proof I send.
Thank you for this clarification!
What about all of the heavy metals also found in the vaccines? Lead, aluminum, cadmium, cesium, gadolinium, magnetic beads, etc. I have videos of my friends who can still stick a spoon to the site where they were injected 6 months ago.
We are in the realm of theorizing about something which is being held at arms length. Samples and analysis to date has only been conducted on a handful of vials, and the study has not been standardized.
There is a dearth of data.
The inability to study this and unwillingness by the powers that be to let it be studied should be a red flag for anyone looking at this. If these things are “safe and effective”, then there should be no issue with examining the contents. Further, as products of tax dollars, these things should be subject to public scrutiny and adhere to legal requirements and basic manufacturing standards.
Reprising my comment from yesterday, with slight modification:
Without a good cross-lot comparative randomized study of vial contents with multiple researchers investigating independently, I would offer that it’s impossible to say with any confidence what is in the jab. Without parallel independent research and some standardized method of study, it is unreasonable to draw conclusions about what is being observed.
The data source is both not representative and too small.
The examination of the vial contents needs to compare and cross-reference not only microscopy, but chemical and biological analysis, including spectrometry for composition and sanger sequencing for genomic data.
Commentary offered, which is enlightening and useful, should reasonably be heard as informed opinion and not conclusive. This also does not mean the commentary is false. There is simply not enough data or study to draw conclusions.
We have to be honest with what we don’t know.
patent for nanowires thru a syringe:
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2015199784A2/en