It seems as if the NWO crowd is using the brainwashed religious Zionist types to do the dirty for work for one-world government. Then, the trillion-dollar-plus banker familes swoop in after and reap the benefits.
This is where I struggle. I can’t logically get around the idea of a small cadre of families somewhere, somehow, running this all through layers of lieutenants. Surely this is the very definition of a world government, no? If they crash it all, who do they reap benefits from? Do they not already sit at the top of the heap? Why should they care where the map lines are drawn, or ngo org charts? They already own it ALL.
Questions that a rational person with incentive structure paradigms drilled into our heads since birth might find apt. ..that are more or less irrelevant.
Saw this with people who are like BUD LIGHT IS TANKING THEIR BRAND.
They want LESS PEOPLE AND DIGITAL SHOCK COLLARED SLAVES. MONEY IS A PROXY AND THEY HAVE ALREADY VACCUUMED ALL THAT UP.
THEY NEED CENTRALIZATION. OF ALL THINGS. ALL THINGS MONITORED.
They for sure want fewer people. And are implementing like mad. But implementing high levels of awareness and control is somewhere in the distant past. The collar zaps are being culturally normalized, but the collar seems to have been slipped on a long time ago.
For the goyim NWO that should create a bit of a mess. Wonder what the Talmud provides for this double headed monster. I am more and more circling the Nephilim reality, based on the inability to hammer the contradictions in the human puzzle into place. Humans intermingled with uh, predatory aliens openly dreaming of slaughtering and devouring them and wearing body parts for decor.. I can’t line it up any other way. So, the degree of lineage interbreeding would create degrees of nepilized humanoids. And seriously, does your skin not crawl when your senses come into proximity of the globo club’s finest, the Rothschilds, Kissingers, Monarchy, Meadows…..the reptilian flair - just plain old human 9nth sense. This whole dystopian shipwreck we find ourselves in is so darkly surreal, I am questioning every day how this is a creation of human minds.
I'm very open an amenable to woo explanations. And science.
Honest question here: what has happened over the past four years, or 50 years, or thousand years that doesn't seem possible without demons (etc) being involved? I have seen evil, for sure. But when I dig in, there is no bit I can't imagine a deeply amoral human being accomplishing on their own, or with a group of human compatriots.
Woo or whatever, key is to avoid corrals. The narrower your spotlight, the less one can see the gate. Got here because I ended up in some and walked back out. Still a need to explain the “deeply amoral” human. Sage brought up ‘genetics’.
JWICS. This could be the alternative and if she is right it started a long time ago. I don’t see it fixing all my questions though. Even if time has been an illusion.
::raises hand slowly::: maybe they still want moar. Mooooaaaaaarrrrrr....Forever!
War proof forever?
Dunno,S... I went to AI Bots to seek understanding of the CAVE.
------
"They know what they want. They want more."
-----
They Want More (Carlin Quote)
Based on the search results, George Carlin’s quotes and statements reveal a consistent theme: those in power and authority want more for themselves and less for everyone else. Here are some key points:
Obedient workers: Carlin believed governments want a population capable of performing tasks, but not critical thinking. They desire obedient workers, people just smart enough to run machines, but not questioning or challenging authority.
Lobbying and influence: Carlin pointed out that powerful interests spend billions of dollars every year lobbying to get what they want. This includes judges, media companies, and other influential entities.
Self-interest: He argued that those in power want more for themselves, while seeking less for others. This is evident in their pursuit of wealth, power, and control.
Education: Carlin believed that education sucks because it’s designed to produce obedient workers, not critical thinkers. This aligns with his notion that governments and powerful interests want people who can perform tasks, but not question or challenge authority.
Religion: In his commentary on religion, Carlin highlighted how religious institutions take in vast sums of money, pay no taxes, and always need more. He saw this as a prime example of “good bullshit” and criticized the way religion is often used to manipulate and control people.
The criminals don't want anyone left that would go after them and take them out or their stolen gains. They need a mop up operation after their crimes. No crime is perfect without an essential mop up to cover it up!
Their accomplices are probably their biggest worry and mop up targets?
Leave no witnesses or challengers to the capos, as the Godfathers know.
Though they share a delusion of being the chosen custard. Yes, we are looking at nested layers of psychopathic predation, but let’s keep in mind that many of the NWO parasites are Ashkenazi Jews.
IMO, this is not a religion--it's a death cult of psychopaths and an organized crime operation. And they unfortunately have complete control over the US govt.
"If Israel insists on destroying civilian targets in Lebanon, let them buy and build their own weapons. American taxpayers should not be funding this."
Jordan Schachtel (Jewish American showing where his loyalty lies)
Oh, wow, totally missed that about him!! Not surprised. I briefly subscribed to his substack, but when he kept promoting that BS that the Federal Reserve is a govt institution, despite me providing links proving it's a private Rothschild bank.
Interestingly, after self-appointed propaganda expert MCM noted that there was a lot of money/power behind the covid operation, I sent him all my info on the Jewish banking cartel that has had the power to create money out of thin air for hundreds of years. He apparently didn't find that info interesting.
Wow. That makes two "Tier Two" revelations for me in two days. Schachtel and from another Substack, Ezra Levant, another "health freedom fighter" who I believe runs Rebel News in Canada.
I've wondered before what it is about the SFC that is so effective in manipulating people to do such terrible things. I'm wondering that now. To say that it's a cult doesn't answer the question.
Cults always have a religious fervor, so they are religions in a different guise. Not only obvious cults like the Jim Jones koolaid cult, but even boring seeming cults that sell cosmetics. They hype people up. People become entranced. Enchanted. They promise salvation (or a lot of money which can seem like salvation).
Legit businesses including a big box home improvement store has, in my own experience used some of these tactics. Is it stirring up the oxytocin? And how do they do this? I run across many cults or cult tactics in any given time period. I've learned to spot it in many cases. But I'm trying to better understand it.
In the fateful year 1917 the British cabinet had one Jewish member: Edwin Montagu. He was also the only cabinet member to oppose the Balfour Declaration of that year, which paved the way for the self-declared creation of the state of Israel, the so-called Jewish State, 31 tumultuous years later. The declaration was a brief letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lionel Walter Rothschild, a leader in Britain of the Zionist project, launched in the late 19th century by Theodor Herzl, to establish a Jewish state in Palestine The letter stated,
His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
Montagu responded to the cabinet in a memorandum titled “The Anti-Semitism of the Present Government Here’s what he wrote:
* * *
I have chosen the above title for this memorandum, not in any hostile sense, not by any means as quarrelling with an anti-Semitic view which may be held by my colleagues, not with a desire to deny that anti-Semitism can be held by rational men, not even with a view to suggesting that the Government is deliberately anti-Semitic; but I wish to place on record my view that the policy of His Majesty’s Government is anti-Semitic and in result will prove a rallying ground for Anti-Semites in every country in the world.
This view is prompted by the receipt yesterday of a correspondence between Lord Rothschild and Mr. Balfour.
Lord Rothschild’s letter is dated the 18th July and Mr. Balfour’s answer is to be dated August 1917. I fear that my protest comes too late, and it may well be that the Government were practically committed when Lord Rothschild wrote and before I became a member of the Government, for there has obviously been some correspondence or conversation before this letter. But I do feel that as the one Jewish Minister in the Government I may be allowed by my colleagues an opportunity of expressing views which may be peculiar to myself, but which I hold very strongly and which I must ask permission to express when opportunity affords.
oy vey. You make a lot of hay over this one individual being of a particular tribe. Methinks this is somewhat misleading in that history provides ample evidence the overwhelming majority of actors involved in this OG Operation were also of the same tribe- most importantly all the string pullers as well as the bankers funding the entire swindle. You would be better off trying to run the black nobility
con, or even the 'alien reptilian royalty is behind it all' than the sympathy card for the good tribesmembers.
Jeff Berwick has the best retort for this sort of dissembling apologist nonsense
Zionism is not Hebrew religion. Galut is the heart of this faith. Not a mass migration to create a secular exclusive Jewish nation state to colonize the Levant.
The Christian Zionists I know are fanatical about Israel regaining all the land in the Bible … by taking over Temple Mount / sacrificing heifers / building a new temple ..all which will lead to WW3 ..
and it seems like their is a big “Hollywood” director getting all this to occur now … it’s been a long plan in the making .. I don’t think anyone can stop what’s coming..
I’m in agreement with this statement but the important point here is the fact man is not truly in control overall and chance and accident are your chief concern as inputs. Math and philosophical skills are employed to establish elucidation as input to explicate the agreed understanding pperception and truth.
Here we go. Right on schedule. You guys can never resist boasting of your own self inflated prowess. Such tiresome blowhards. It's a very reliable tell. "man is not truly in control" haha. and "math and philosophical skills are employed".
Translation;
"You fools don't stand a chance haha we Judaic supremacists run circles around you with our big smart gematria, demonology, astrotheology, and child murdering blood sacrifice Kabbalah sorcery and made up bible stories to manipulate reality while you, stupid animal goy are relegated to struggle with "chance and accident" as your only hope to affect change in the so called reality of our realm."
Granting the best intentions and sincerity to Montagu and others (all the way forward to a segment of American Jews in the 40s when the fake "nation" was created), what difference does it make other than to clarify, again, that ALL Jews aren't Zionists? And ALL Zionists aren't Jews? The facts on the ground are that since 1948, "Israel" is what it is due to Begin; Ben Gurion; Shamir; Sharon; Peres ; Barak, Netanyahu; etc. Not due to the British Empire (which sucked and wanted conflict to weaken the Arabs in the region). And they've been elected and affirmed by the populace. Shamir was elected prime minister RIGHT AFTER it became known he (unsuccessfully) tried to enlist and fight in the National Socialist army. At best, this argument seems parallel to MCM concluding that Jews don't "Control" the media. Correct; it's not total Control. Not ALL media owners are Jewish. It's control; as in disproportionate, powerful (in bottom line terms), CONTROLLING influence. Rupert Murdoch isn't Jewish. That means nothing regarding his ties to and biased projections of Israel.
Network control. Jews not only married in to old aristocratic families in the 19th century but wove themselves into power.
Mandatory Palestine, built from the sanjaq of Jerusalem and two southern sanjaqs of the vilayet, was unique in British imperial history. Hitherto all British dependencies had fallen into two broad categories: colonies of occupation and colonies of settlement. The first, ranging from India and Nigeria to Gibraltar, were held because they were thought to fulfil some of a wide range of economic or strategic purposes. The second, such as Australia and Canada, were acquired mainly for settlement by Britons. Palestine did not fit either category, as it should have been a quasi-colony of occupation, yet it was treated as a colony of settlement. This chapter explains this seemingly irrational fact.
I think the more a given program compels you to follow funny rules, the more cult-like it is.
Humans should expect high officials to do silly things we all think are pointless, but to ask the lay congregation to adhere to rituals is very much like a cult or fascist society. Then you add the genetic requirements and it gets really weird.
Ancient. Tribal. Exclusive = usually bad for everyone on the outside of the group.
Definitions: supremacy means that a group of people gains power over another group of people, using violence. For example, slavery is a form of supremacy.
Evaluation: I have doubts that I can judge supremacy as bad, or immoral, because it seems part of the normal course of human affairs. For example, the communists won supremacy over the nazis because they were better at warfare.
As a result of that supremacy, the Germans became slaves of the soviets for more than four decades. Many Germans still have that slave mentality, even though the communists lost power.
Why did the soviet communists lost power? Because reality has supremacy over religions like communism.
Which begs the question: why do human beings systematically oppose reality, and invent new religions all the time: new age, feminism, environmentalism, ecologism, WEFism, fasciocommunism, technologism, Evangelicalism, Messianic Judaism, Zionism, just name a few new religions?
I'm not sure about the answer to that. As for now, I think humans reject reality because they are ashamed of reality.
Many people feel shame about their mortality. They invent stuff all the time to negate their mortality. It's not going to work. And their inventions will make live miserable to many others.
It's better to get acquainted with reality and accept mortality, in my humble opinion. The man who does that will not invent as much crap as the man who avoids reality.
On the matter of violence. I think violence is the key to understand pacifism. Culturally, pacifism means "non-violence." But humans are violent. Therefore, pacifism is inhuman.
It my be considered divine by those who argue that God or the gods are non-violent. But it also may be considered divine by those who argue that God or the gods are violent. And those who deny God or the gods really have no other choice than to admit that violence is part of the human experience, as much as mortality, love, reason, or feeding graphenated doritos to killers whales to cause them depression so that they stop hurting cute furry sea animals with cute eyes and funny whiskers, those jerks killer whales.
I completely lost my mind on that one.
Let's recap.
Pacifism should only mean: making peace.
I know it's a lost cause. My favorites!
Making peace may require violence.
There are possible situations in which humans being violent against other humans may cause peace. It may cause a better life for humans.
Definition of peace: humans living better than they normally live, enjoying whatever time they have left until mortality becomes manifest.
There is a problem with my view of violence: it allows God to be violent.
We cannot judge a God of justice who uses violence if we allow ourselves to be selectively violent.
But we want to judge God, and convict him, and punish him out of existence. Because reality brings shame to us.
That's my current thought.
Practical case: is it ever OK for humans to kill children?
Definition of children for the purpose of this practical case: a young human that has no responsibility in whatever actions were taken by his relatives.
Judgment of the case: Those children should not be killed. They are blameless. The humans who killed them should be violently killed. They have earned that fate.
Practical case variant of concern: is it OK for God kill children? I think yes, in some cases. I made this argument the other day. God knows everything and he is everywhere. If he knows (I don't know, I'm not God) that an hypothetical blameless child will (perfective aspect* of the verb) become an unjust adult, and he chooses to take his life before that happens, I have nothing to oppose.
But I do have something to oppose against evil charlatans who claim to speak for God and they don't.
Now, my opinion (which may change) is disgusting for atheists and agnostics. They make the very bad argument that God does not exist because they don't like killing blameless children. But most of the atheists and agnostics actually have no problem using violence in general or even in killing innocent people, even children, when they can get away with it. As during wars. Which is one reason why pseudo-pacifists foment war. They want impunity, to kill unjustly.
I clearly see that the people who say there is no God will do all the things the criticize about God, claiming that God is a violent psychopath for doing what they desire to do. Which is a confession of faith.
And any God hater is likely to create a new custom religion to allow himself the right to justly butcher innocent people. Or at least to try to justify other people's unjustly violent actions. We've all seen how atheists support the genocide of innocent Palestinians.
Which I think gives a bad reputation to other atheists who are more internally consistent. But the tarnished reputation is not a defense: by attacking Christianity, people have unwittingly enabled genocides galore. Dummies!
Even those who deny Christianity should have been defending Christianity as a great vehicle for pacifism, understood as the moral intuition to use violence only to bring about peace. Christianity as one method to tame the natural injustice and violence of humans.
The critics became method-less.
However, no mortal is prefect. We've seen many defenders of Christianity making the terrible mistake of defending structures of injustice, such as social security, public health, disease control, public education, central banking, inflationism of the currency, interventionism, and even democracy itself. I conclude that Christians are more to blame than atheists for the current state of human affairs.
This happened because Christians let themselves become hypnotized by the siren song of democracy. They should have remained firmly in core theological tenets, such as the core idea that the Law given to Moses was completed with Jesus Christ. So the psychopath judaizers would have no leg to stand on. Why did the psychopath judaizers convinced the world that the texts of the Bible are forgeries, part of a millennary psyop? The easy answer: because they wanted war, and Christianity was in the way.
To some extent, the anti-Christian psyop is part of the causes of the Palestinian genocide of innocent people.
And most people will never accept that. They prefer the genocide to the shame of acknowledging reality.
God, if he exists, is not to blame for our state. God, if he doesn't exist, is not to blame for our state.
Been to some live mma and ufc. Felt the reverberation of bodies slam each other to the mat all the way from the nosebleeds. It's hard to argue against the basic reality of violence. It works for bears and lions and ants. Violence is programmed in deeply into the rules of reality. It's nice when humans agree to not resort to it, but it's always an option, down deep.
Id guess because humans are fairly unique. Because we can project into another, and imagine how something feels. I bet crows can. Elephants too. Dolphins? Maybe some great apes? But it’s pretty rare. Psychological violence just doesn’t feel like physical violence. Probably easier to sit with, if you perpetrate it.
Violence is the ultimate “you shall not pass”. Sometimes that’s needed.
Maybe the transhumanists really have it right. If we can all just upload our minds and live on solar power, violence is no longer necessary. (/s…maybe?)
Let me blow your mind: all life on earth depends on solar power, by default.
What's weird is that humans have fire. And Internal combustion engines. And Generators that kill eagles and vultures. And we create artificial islands. And muh roads. And zeppelins to see the curvature of the planet. And money lending. We do a lot of unnatural things.
And in spite of all the wonderful things, there is still massive amounts of violence. And people who enjoy it. It may be that technology enables far more violence. Who knows.
I saw a clip once that I wish I could unsee. It’s seared into my mind. A chimp that keeps batting an animals head down as it is eaten alive. Ripping chunks off its hind legs, as the animal futilely resists.
The modern state of Israel has little connection to the chosen nation of Israel in biblical times. Zionists hate God and use physical descent from Abraham as a false cloak covering their own wickedness and self-righteousness.
Read Galatians 4 and 5 to get a better understanding of who God's chosen people really are - i.e. whoever is in Christ by faith can lay hold of the promises.
If we're only going by the Bible, there are many passages that render the "chosen people" argument null or obsolete. Romans 10: 12-13 and Galatians 3: 28-29 are a couple of direct ones.
Abraham rediscovered G-d via philosophical analysis and his descendants have big brother status. It could have been an Irishman, in which case the Torah would be set in Ireland and written in Gaelic. Or a Navajo, etc. The cosmic mission of the Jewish people is to follow Torah (613 Commandments) and compel the nations to recognize G-d’s Laws for them. This will culminate in a worldwide Utopia, the Messianic Era, within 215 years. See this for a thumbnail sketch: https://trypophobiac.com/2022/06/10/attn-human-resources
Judaism & Israel are not ultimately about the Jewish people. They’re about the Glory and Honor of HaShem, the Source of all reality other than Himself, the Holy One, the True Judge, G-d.
It seems as if the NWO crowd is using the brainwashed religious Zionist types to do the dirty for work for one-world government. Then, the trillion-dollar-plus banker familes swoop in after and reap the benefits.
Sharp insight, RR
It’s right in our face
https://youtu.be/xA92oPwKK70
This is where I struggle. I can’t logically get around the idea of a small cadre of families somewhere, somehow, running this all through layers of lieutenants. Surely this is the very definition of a world government, no? If they crash it all, who do they reap benefits from? Do they not already sit at the top of the heap? Why should they care where the map lines are drawn, or ngo org charts? They already own it ALL.
Questions that a rational person with incentive structure paradigms drilled into our heads since birth might find apt. ..that are more or less irrelevant.
Saw this with people who are like BUD LIGHT IS TANKING THEIR BRAND.
They want LESS PEOPLE AND DIGITAL SHOCK COLLARED SLAVES. MONEY IS A PROXY AND THEY HAVE ALREADY VACCUUMED ALL THAT UP.
THEY NEED CENTRALIZATION. OF ALL THINGS. ALL THINGS MONITORED.
Don’t they already have it?
Do they have less people? Probably not to their specifications or their plans.
Lift that heavy ass weight and report back on the tech of the digital IDs and shock collars.
Or just fire relentless questions uncontrollably.
Uh, hello?
Is this the Oracle of Delphi?
Yes, yes...I wanted to know if you offer a subscription model.
😅
Oracle works for Smashburgers and Kofi!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
This was over two decades ago.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-Automatic_Ground_Environment
This one is over six decades ago.
https://i.imgur.com/b8H4ooT_d.webp?maxwidth=760&fidelity=grand
This going on a hundred years?
They for sure want fewer people. And are implementing like mad. But implementing high levels of awareness and control is somewhere in the distant past. The collar zaps are being culturally normalized, but the collar seems to have been slipped on a long time ago.
Okay good, you answered your own questions, sounds like! Nice.
For the goyim NWO that should create a bit of a mess. Wonder what the Talmud provides for this double headed monster. I am more and more circling the Nephilim reality, based on the inability to hammer the contradictions in the human puzzle into place. Humans intermingled with uh, predatory aliens openly dreaming of slaughtering and devouring them and wearing body parts for decor.. I can’t line it up any other way. So, the degree of lineage interbreeding would create degrees of nepilized humanoids. And seriously, does your skin not crawl when your senses come into proximity of the globo club’s finest, the Rothschilds, Kissingers, Monarchy, Meadows…..the reptilian flair - just plain old human 9nth sense. This whole dystopian shipwreck we find ourselves in is so darkly surreal, I am questioning every day how this is a creation of human minds.
I'm very open an amenable to woo explanations. And science.
Honest question here: what has happened over the past four years, or 50 years, or thousand years that doesn't seem possible without demons (etc) being involved? I have seen evil, for sure. But when I dig in, there is no bit I can't imagine a deeply amoral human being accomplishing on their own, or with a group of human compatriots.
Woo or whatever, key is to avoid corrals. The narrower your spotlight, the less one can see the gate. Got here because I ended up in some and walked back out. Still a need to explain the “deeply amoral” human. Sage brought up ‘genetics’.
JWICS. This could be the alternative and if she is right it started a long time ago. I don’t see it fixing all my questions though. Even if time has been an illusion.
https://rumble.com/v5jrdvd-dia-and-the-jwics-surveillance-under-the-skin.html?
::raises hand slowly::: maybe they still want moar. Mooooaaaaaarrrrrr....Forever!
War proof forever?
Dunno,S... I went to AI Bots to seek understanding of the CAVE.
------
"They know what they want. They want more."
-----
They Want More (Carlin Quote)
Based on the search results, George Carlin’s quotes and statements reveal a consistent theme: those in power and authority want more for themselves and less for everyone else. Here are some key points:
Obedient workers: Carlin believed governments want a population capable of performing tasks, but not critical thinking. They desire obedient workers, people just smart enough to run machines, but not questioning or challenging authority.
Lobbying and influence: Carlin pointed out that powerful interests spend billions of dollars every year lobbying to get what they want. This includes judges, media companies, and other influential entities.
Self-interest: He argued that those in power want more for themselves, while seeking less for others. This is evident in their pursuit of wealth, power, and control.
Education: Carlin believed that education sucks because it’s designed to produce obedient workers, not critical thinkers. This aligns with his notion that governments and powerful interests want people who can perform tasks, but not question or challenge authority.
Religion: In his commentary on religion, Carlin highlighted how religious institutions take in vast sums of money, pay no taxes, and always need more. He saw this as a prime example of “good bullshit” and criticized the way religion is often used to manipulate and control people.
Carlin is always a good bet.
They already rule the world. They just want to enslave us better.
Lock in their gainnnzzzz
The criminals don't want anyone left that would go after them and take them out or their stolen gains. They need a mop up operation after their crimes. No crime is perfect without an essential mop up to cover it up!
Their accomplices are probably their biggest worry and mop up targets?
Leave no witnesses or challengers to the capos, as the Godfathers know.
We’re already slaves, they need fewer of us.
Precisely how to enslave better.
The humanoid robots are here to do the work. The elite families in charge no longer need so many peasants..
Someone on Substack yesterday referred to them as the “Glafia”. …
Global Mafia Family …made up of old families that run the world 🌎 and have forever ..
I can’t understand how much censorship occurs in USA with regards to Israel & entire conflict 🤯
Exactly buddy...
https://substack.com/@albert358099/note/c-74008304?r=1lcbou
Though they share a delusion of being the chosen custard. Yes, we are looking at nested layers of psychopathic predation, but let’s keep in mind that many of the NWO parasites are Ashkenazi Jews.
more from the psychopathic rabbis--they are talking about the Torah, so it's not just the Talmud that they use to back up their EVIL:
"There is no permission from the Torah to have any mercy whatsoever"
"Do not have mercy on their children. Kill all their children also"
https://x.com/real1maria/status/1727221640688467988
IMO, this is not a religion--it's a death cult of psychopaths and an organized crime operation. And they unfortunately have complete control over the US govt.
It's like trying to discuss a floating ghost. Always there, always shifting, and the True Believers arguing their fee-fee spaces like small children.
NO THAT'S NOT THE REAL SHIT, SEE LOOK OVER HERE TO THIS LOVE STUFF! 😅
ME: This is doublespeak!
Calling the balls out the chute becomes an act of increasing courage the closer you get to the source code
the response to this unvarnished absolute and direct broadside will be very revealing, as usual
fwiw- thought this was an interesting exchange, starting w/Massie (the only America FIRST and ONLY) politician in Congress:
https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1849165384571560052
"If Israel insists on destroying civilian targets in Lebanon, let them buy and build their own weapons. American taxpayers should not be funding this."
Jordan Schachtel (Jewish American showing where his loyalty lies)
https://x.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1849187059866456259
"Did you as a US rep confirm that this is a "civilian target"?
"What is the source for your video?"
https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1849198907454009658
Is this you?
video with heading "Jordan Schachtel describes his "secretive" work for the state of Israel:
Same dude who confirmed that Tiffany Dover is alive, btw. 😅
S, gonna run the rabbis again. The cover of Tier Two is coming off.
Socially engineered to get the "patriots" into the War Crime mix.
Oh, wow, totally missed that about him!! Not surprised. I briefly subscribed to his substack, but when he kept promoting that BS that the Federal Reserve is a govt institution, despite me providing links proving it's a private Rothschild bank.
Interestingly, after self-appointed propaganda expert MCM noted that there was a lot of money/power behind the covid operation, I sent him all my info on the Jewish banking cartel that has had the power to create money out of thin air for hundreds of years. He apparently didn't find that info interesting.
Perhaps MCM is in the tank for the cause, me thinks.
Much is being explained in real time now.
Man did we wander into a trap with this Jabs Bad/Died Suddenly lair.
The greeters RIGHT AWAY when I started writing about shots, S
Too bad. Sad, really.
Wow. That makes two "Tier Two" revelations for me in two days. Schachtel and from another Substack, Ezra Levant, another "health freedom fighter" who I believe runs Rebel News in Canada.
I've wondered before what it is about the SFC that is so effective in manipulating people to do such terrible things. I'm wondering that now. To say that it's a cult doesn't answer the question.
Cults always have a religious fervor, so they are religions in a different guise. Not only obvious cults like the Jim Jones koolaid cult, but even boring seeming cults that sell cosmetics. They hype people up. People become entranced. Enchanted. They promise salvation (or a lot of money which can seem like salvation).
Legit businesses including a big box home improvement store has, in my own experience used some of these tactics. Is it stirring up the oxytocin? And how do they do this? I run across many cults or cult tactics in any given time period. I've learned to spot it in many cases. But I'm trying to better understand it.
They have refined it in more recent times.
Jason Breshears of Archaix agrees with you.
(Just about a minute long, starting from linked timestamp.)
https://www.youtube.com/live/SUbUdtgqZts?si=qQqNiCUqoG-J8as0&t=1h28m54s
Very political. https://original.antiwar.com/srichman/2023/12/05/jewish-dissent-on-the-balfour-declaration/
In the fateful year 1917 the British cabinet had one Jewish member: Edwin Montagu. He was also the only cabinet member to oppose the Balfour Declaration of that year, which paved the way for the self-declared creation of the state of Israel, the so-called Jewish State, 31 tumultuous years later. The declaration was a brief letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lionel Walter Rothschild, a leader in Britain of the Zionist project, launched in the late 19th century by Theodor Herzl, to establish a Jewish state in Palestine The letter stated,
His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
Montagu responded to the cabinet in a memorandum titled “The Anti-Semitism of the Present Government Here’s what he wrote:
* * *
I have chosen the above title for this memorandum, not in any hostile sense, not by any means as quarrelling with an anti-Semitic view which may be held by my colleagues, not with a desire to deny that anti-Semitism can be held by rational men, not even with a view to suggesting that the Government is deliberately anti-Semitic; but I wish to place on record my view that the policy of His Majesty’s Government is anti-Semitic and in result will prove a rallying ground for Anti-Semites in every country in the world.
This view is prompted by the receipt yesterday of a correspondence between Lord Rothschild and Mr. Balfour.
Lord Rothschild’s letter is dated the 18th July and Mr. Balfour’s answer is to be dated August 1917. I fear that my protest comes too late, and it may well be that the Government were practically committed when Lord Rothschild wrote and before I became a member of the Government, for there has obviously been some correspondence or conversation before this letter. But I do feel that as the one Jewish Minister in the Government I may be allowed by my colleagues an opportunity of expressing views which may be peculiar to myself, but which I hold very strongly and which I must ask permission to express when opportunity affords.
(go to link for full)
oy vey. You make a lot of hay over this one individual being of a particular tribe. Methinks this is somewhat misleading in that history provides ample evidence the overwhelming majority of actors involved in this OG Operation were also of the same tribe- most importantly all the string pullers as well as the bankers funding the entire swindle. You would be better off trying to run the black nobility
con, or even the 'alien reptilian royalty is behind it all' than the sympathy card for the good tribesmembers.
Jeff Berwick has the best retort for this sort of dissembling apologist nonsense
Zionism is not Hebrew religion. Galut is the heart of this faith. Not a mass migration to create a secular exclusive Jewish nation state to colonize the Levant.
The Christian Zionists I know are fanatical about Israel regaining all the land in the Bible … by taking over Temple Mount / sacrificing heifers / building a new temple ..all which will lead to WW3 ..
and it seems like their is a big “Hollywood” director getting all this to occur now … it’s been a long plan in the making .. I don’t think anyone can stop what’s coming..
I’m in agreement with this statement but the important point here is the fact man is not truly in control overall and chance and accident are your chief concern as inputs. Math and philosophical skills are employed to establish elucidation as input to explicate the agreed understanding pperception and truth.
Here we go. Right on schedule. You guys can never resist boasting of your own self inflated prowess. Such tiresome blowhards. It's a very reliable tell. "man is not truly in control" haha. and "math and philosophical skills are employed".
Translation;
"You fools don't stand a chance haha we Judaic supremacists run circles around you with our big smart gematria, demonology, astrotheology, and child murdering blood sacrifice Kabbalah sorcery and made up bible stories to manipulate reality while you, stupid animal goy are relegated to struggle with "chance and accident" as your only hope to affect change in the so called reality of our realm."
Granting the best intentions and sincerity to Montagu and others (all the way forward to a segment of American Jews in the 40s when the fake "nation" was created), what difference does it make other than to clarify, again, that ALL Jews aren't Zionists? And ALL Zionists aren't Jews? The facts on the ground are that since 1948, "Israel" is what it is due to Begin; Ben Gurion; Shamir; Sharon; Peres ; Barak, Netanyahu; etc. Not due to the British Empire (which sucked and wanted conflict to weaken the Arabs in the region). And they've been elected and affirmed by the populace. Shamir was elected prime minister RIGHT AFTER it became known he (unsuccessfully) tried to enlist and fight in the National Socialist army. At best, this argument seems parallel to MCM concluding that Jews don't "Control" the media. Correct; it's not total Control. Not ALL media owners are Jewish. It's control; as in disproportionate, powerful (in bottom line terms), CONTROLLING influence. Rupert Murdoch isn't Jewish. That means nothing regarding his ties to and biased projections of Israel.
Network control. Jews not only married in to old aristocratic families in the 19th century but wove themselves into power.
Mandatory Palestine, built from the sanjaq of Jerusalem and two southern sanjaqs of the vilayet, was unique in British imperial history. Hitherto all British dependencies had fallen into two broad categories: colonies of occupation and colonies of settlement. The first, ranging from India and Nigeria to Gibraltar, were held because they were thought to fulfil some of a wide range of economic or strategic purposes. The second, such as Australia and Canada, were acquired mainly for settlement by Britons. Palestine did not fit either category, as it should have been a quasi-colony of occupation, yet it was treated as a colony of settlement. This chapter explains this seemingly irrational fact.
https://academic.oup.com/book/2425/chapter-abstract/142655715?redirectedFrom=fulltext
I think the more a given program compels you to follow funny rules, the more cult-like it is.
Humans should expect high officials to do silly things we all think are pointless, but to ask the lay congregation to adhere to rituals is very much like a cult or fascist society. Then you add the genetic requirements and it gets really weird.
Ancient. Tribal. Exclusive = usually bad for everyone on the outside of the group.
Warning: rant ahead.
Is supremacy immoral?
Is violence immoral?
Definitions: supremacy means that a group of people gains power over another group of people, using violence. For example, slavery is a form of supremacy.
Evaluation: I have doubts that I can judge supremacy as bad, or immoral, because it seems part of the normal course of human affairs. For example, the communists won supremacy over the nazis because they were better at warfare.
As a result of that supremacy, the Germans became slaves of the soviets for more than four decades. Many Germans still have that slave mentality, even though the communists lost power.
Why did the soviet communists lost power? Because reality has supremacy over religions like communism.
Which begs the question: why do human beings systematically oppose reality, and invent new religions all the time: new age, feminism, environmentalism, ecologism, WEFism, fasciocommunism, technologism, Evangelicalism, Messianic Judaism, Zionism, just name a few new religions?
I'm not sure about the answer to that. As for now, I think humans reject reality because they are ashamed of reality.
Many people feel shame about their mortality. They invent stuff all the time to negate their mortality. It's not going to work. And their inventions will make live miserable to many others.
It's better to get acquainted with reality and accept mortality, in my humble opinion. The man who does that will not invent as much crap as the man who avoids reality.
On the matter of violence. I think violence is the key to understand pacifism. Culturally, pacifism means "non-violence." But humans are violent. Therefore, pacifism is inhuman.
It my be considered divine by those who argue that God or the gods are non-violent. But it also may be considered divine by those who argue that God or the gods are violent. And those who deny God or the gods really have no other choice than to admit that violence is part of the human experience, as much as mortality, love, reason, or feeding graphenated doritos to killers whales to cause them depression so that they stop hurting cute furry sea animals with cute eyes and funny whiskers, those jerks killer whales.
I completely lost my mind on that one.
Let's recap.
Pacifism should only mean: making peace.
I know it's a lost cause. My favorites!
Making peace may require violence.
There are possible situations in which humans being violent against other humans may cause peace. It may cause a better life for humans.
Definition of peace: humans living better than they normally live, enjoying whatever time they have left until mortality becomes manifest.
There is a problem with my view of violence: it allows God to be violent.
We cannot judge a God of justice who uses violence if we allow ourselves to be selectively violent.
But we want to judge God, and convict him, and punish him out of existence. Because reality brings shame to us.
That's my current thought.
Practical case: is it ever OK for humans to kill children?
Definition of children for the purpose of this practical case: a young human that has no responsibility in whatever actions were taken by his relatives.
Judgment of the case: Those children should not be killed. They are blameless. The humans who killed them should be violently killed. They have earned that fate.
Practical case variant of concern: is it OK for God kill children? I think yes, in some cases. I made this argument the other day. God knows everything and he is everywhere. If he knows (I don't know, I'm not God) that an hypothetical blameless child will (perfective aspect* of the verb) become an unjust adult, and he chooses to take his life before that happens, I have nothing to oppose.
But I do have something to oppose against evil charlatans who claim to speak for God and they don't.
Now, my opinion (which may change) is disgusting for atheists and agnostics. They make the very bad argument that God does not exist because they don't like killing blameless children. But most of the atheists and agnostics actually have no problem using violence in general or even in killing innocent people, even children, when they can get away with it. As during wars. Which is one reason why pseudo-pacifists foment war. They want impunity, to kill unjustly.
I clearly see that the people who say there is no God will do all the things the criticize about God, claiming that God is a violent psychopath for doing what they desire to do. Which is a confession of faith.
And any God hater is likely to create a new custom religion to allow himself the right to justly butcher innocent people. Or at least to try to justify other people's unjustly violent actions. We've all seen how atheists support the genocide of innocent Palestinians.
Which I think gives a bad reputation to other atheists who are more internally consistent. But the tarnished reputation is not a defense: by attacking Christianity, people have unwittingly enabled genocides galore. Dummies!
Even those who deny Christianity should have been defending Christianity as a great vehicle for pacifism, understood as the moral intuition to use violence only to bring about peace. Christianity as one method to tame the natural injustice and violence of humans.
The critics became method-less.
However, no mortal is prefect. We've seen many defenders of Christianity making the terrible mistake of defending structures of injustice, such as social security, public health, disease control, public education, central banking, inflationism of the currency, interventionism, and even democracy itself. I conclude that Christians are more to blame than atheists for the current state of human affairs.
This happened because Christians let themselves become hypnotized by the siren song of democracy. They should have remained firmly in core theological tenets, such as the core idea that the Law given to Moses was completed with Jesus Christ. So the psychopath judaizers would have no leg to stand on. Why did the psychopath judaizers convinced the world that the texts of the Bible are forgeries, part of a millennary psyop? The easy answer: because they wanted war, and Christianity was in the way.
To some extent, the anti-Christian psyop is part of the causes of the Palestinian genocide of innocent people.
And most people will never accept that. They prefer the genocide to the shame of acknowledging reality.
God, if he exists, is not to blame for our state. God, if he doesn't exist, is not to blame for our state.
* https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/perfective_aspect
Been to some live mma and ufc. Felt the reverberation of bodies slam each other to the mat all the way from the nosebleeds. It's hard to argue against the basic reality of violence. It works for bears and lions and ants. Violence is programmed in deeply into the rules of reality. It's nice when humans agree to not resort to it, but it's always an option, down deep.
Yes, but... why do people prefer psychological violence over actual violence?
It doesn't seem cultural. Avoiding violence is also natural.
Id guess because humans are fairly unique. Because we can project into another, and imagine how something feels. I bet crows can. Elephants too. Dolphins? Maybe some great apes? But it’s pretty rare. Psychological violence just doesn’t feel like physical violence. Probably easier to sit with, if you perpetrate it.
Violence is the ultimate “you shall not pass”. Sometimes that’s needed.
Maybe the transhumanists really have it right. If we can all just upload our minds and live on solar power, violence is no longer necessary. (/s…maybe?)
Let me blow your mind: all life on earth depends on solar power, by default.
What's weird is that humans have fire. And Internal combustion engines. And Generators that kill eagles and vultures. And we create artificial islands. And muh roads. And zeppelins to see the curvature of the planet. And money lending. We do a lot of unnatural things.
And in spite of all the wonderful things, there is still massive amounts of violence. And people who enjoy it. It may be that technology enables far more violence. Who knows.
I saw a clip once that I wish I could unsee. It’s seared into my mind. A chimp that keeps batting an animals head down as it is eaten alive. Ripping chunks off its hind legs, as the animal futilely resists.
Incarnating here sure is a mixed bag.
The modern state of Israel has little connection to the chosen nation of Israel in biblical times. Zionists hate God and use physical descent from Abraham as a false cloak covering their own wickedness and self-righteousness.
Read Galatians 4 and 5 to get a better understanding of who God's chosen people really are - i.e. whoever is in Christ by faith can lay hold of the promises.
Right. The Dueling Biblical Texts argument.
Holy Double Speak.
No True Scotsman.
Ultimately to me, it's storytime shit, but then when you see the agendas being manipulated and the atrocity piling up is the real metric.
If we're only going by the Bible, there are many passages that render the "chosen people" argument null or obsolete. Romans 10: 12-13 and Galatians 3: 28-29 are a couple of direct ones.
The Classical Theism of Maimonides isn't a "sky fairy": https://estimatedprophet1977.blogspot.com/2022/07/want-to-understand-g-d-contemplate-his.html
Abraham rediscovered G-d via philosophical analysis and his descendants have big brother status. It could have been an Irishman, in which case the Torah would be set in Ireland and written in Gaelic. Or a Navajo, etc. The cosmic mission of the Jewish people is to follow Torah (613 Commandments) and compel the nations to recognize G-d’s Laws for them. This will culminate in a worldwide Utopia, the Messianic Era, within 215 years. See this for a thumbnail sketch: https://trypophobiac.com/2022/06/10/attn-human-resources
Judaism & Israel are not ultimately about the Jewish people. They’re about the Glory and Honor of HaShem, the Source of all reality other than Himself, the Holy One, the True Judge, G-d.
Next post is for you...and "G-d"
Gettem, Sage~ ❤️🔥
The ideology *kinda* clicks with the creedo "That one's not vaccinated!!",
but, in the interest of the evil layer cake/reality principle, one needs to make accommodation for the "saline shots" aka " secret handshakes".
The opponent flays his victim, puts on the skin, and then goes about betraying loyalties, draining the treasury, and opening the gates to the city.
Yeah
That's the ticket.