The Benevolent Murderers
The Cold Blooded Scorpions "having the discussion" on overpopulation don't have a great track record for being honest or loving critters or admitting that they got zeeee models wrong
The impetus for this discussion launched from the 2014 tweet from one Dr. Robert Malone.
From this post:
Alright, let’s unpack a bit.
First of all, if you are here reading and engaging with this discussion, mazeltov. You are probably part of a very small subset of critters trying to sort out what the hell happened in 2020 with a staged pandemic and the administration of “emergency” countermeasures.
You have an entire dying Tier One of media that will not broach this topic and will perish gratefully with the lack of awareness that they took seven, eight, nine shots to stay up to date for a long-planned Depopulation Agenda/Medical Experiment. (Yes, both.)
You have an entire Tier Two media that was set up to direct you into cul-de-sacs of nothingness and placation.
I finally got over the hump with the agendas.
In May, 2023, I grappled with what was becoming apparent.
Listen.
I’m down to have a discussion on climate change and environmentalism and alternative energy sources and even population growth.
Let’s have a big public discussion on the science, and the actual threats, and the potential remedies. Sure.
If it involves elites who own the world (GPS, Global Power Structures) making the call to cull the herd of the useless eaters and a guise of “carbon credits” and social credit scores and digital IDs and CBDCs and a panopticon of surveillance and doesn’t take into account that the United States Global Mall Cop Military is the most egregious offender of the carbon credit scorecard and that the Rockefellers pop out kids like crazy and that Davos is littered with private jets, then it kinda sounds like you just want to murder people.
Zero population growth, said Paul Ehrlich in a book and on numerous TV shows.
They made a dystopian movie based on his book.
Z.P.G. (short for "Zero Population Growth") is a 1972 Danish-American dystopian science fiction film directed by Michael Campus and starring Oliver Reed and Geraldine Chaplin. It was inspired by the best-selling 1968 non-fiction book The Population Bomb, by Paul R. Ehrlich. The film concerns an overpopulated future Earth whose world government executes those who violate a 30-year ban on having children. Filmed in Denmark, the film is almost entirely set-bound featuring art direction designed to reflect a bleak, oppressive future.
Warning: Do NOT click on this picture and watch this film. It is probably the bleakest, most predictively programmed vision of your life as intended straight out of the mind of Rockefeller/Rothschild/ChathamHouse/pick your Rich Baddy here.
Good Lord, this flick is brutal.
The Ostensible Reason framing for Toooooooo Mannnyyyyyyy Crittterrrzzzzz is indeed alluring.
It was the basis for The Population Bomb in the 1970s and the Kissinger Report and the Rockefeller Commission Report and Nixon and about 50-Dystopian 70s movies.
What it ultimately comes down to is…who gets the privilege of living and procreating.
Hint: Not you. Them. The Davos Set.
The Rockefellers.
The Kings of the World.
How did they amass their wealth?
Oil. War. Plunder.
Now they need you to be “green”.
Now they need YOU to care.
They don’t want to shut down the US Military, a “polluter” on par with 140-nations depending on who you trust.
Nope, they need their private mall cop to enforce their benevolence.
Now they need Agenda 30. And less critters. And surveillance of you.
If you could have this conversation honestly, sure…
They already told you the honest discussion is not going to hebbben.
From 1969: Planned Parenthood Director Richard Day as recollected by physician Lawrence Dunegan.
FALSIFIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting that some scientific research data could be - and indeed has been - falsified in order to bring about desired results. And here was said, "People don't ask the right questions. Some people are too trusting."
Now this was an interesting statement because the speaker and the audience all being doctors of medicine and supposedly very objectively, dispassionately scientific and science being the be all and end-all ... well to falsify scientific research data in that setting is like blasphemy in the church ... you just don't do that.
Anyhow, out of all of this was to come the New International Governing Body, probably to come through the U.N . and with a World Court, but not necessarily through those structures. It could be brought about in other ways. Acceptance of the U.N . at that time was seen as not being as wide as was hoped. Efforts would continue to give the United Nations increasing importance. People would be more and more used to the idea of relinquishing some national sovereignty.
It’s Eugenics.
Who gets to live?
Death Panels.
And One Child Policy in China.
The conversation was never to be had.
The same Scorpion people that think War is Good because it reveals heroism and also keeps population in check and deploy terrorism and fake science and endless threats to keep you in line are not going to have an honest conversation.
That ain’t the way it works.
One of my sources tells me that the Middle Management layer of power is not running around with devil uniforms and pitchforks.
They are just cold-blooded technocrats who come up with a policy and then wash each others balls and lady balls. Self-congratulatory “thought leaders”.
When it’s pointed out the ramifications of the policies, they don’t care.
The party beckons. The party makes them feel pretty.
Anyhooo…They ain’t gonna volunteer and kill themselves or their kids.
Are you?
You know…as part of the conversation?
Sometimes when an airline is overbooked, they will say..."We need (blank) volunteers to delay their flight" or "We need ten volunteers to check their carry on..."
---
"We need some of you to just off yourself and we will off your special needs kids clogging up the social services rolls..."
---
I have a friend's kid who tells me that the youngs are discussing a fetus self-aborting.
There are times when I see the savagery of the human critter and it is astonishing to behold. Not sure what to do with it. I'm not sure where evil begins and instinct ends.
The ostensible vs. the ultimate purpose kicks in hard in these discussions. In HG Wells' The Open Conspiracy and The New World Order, he was careful to always emphasize that the purpose of a one world system of elite control of resources and transportation was to promote WORLD PEACE. You get it, WORLD PEACE. It is good for everyone right?
And if you don't like it enough you might get another WORLD WAR thrown at you for good measure. However, right in The Open Conspiracy Wells made it clear that the real purpose of the conspiracy was so that the top elites would not fight with each other while living extravagant lifestyles as that was wasteful and pointless. Their small group would all be able to afford to live that lifestyle if they first seized total control of resources. Later, in The New World Order he didn't mention the resources so much but he emphasized that the WWII was due to unemployable youth population, an ominous idea for a time that was yet to see the post-war population growth that inspired the 1970s population control ideas.
Eventually, the threat of war started to fail to be sufficiently motivational so in comes the threat of environmental destruction or the nebulous threat of global climate change and all the things they can attribute to it. The real purpose never changed, it is just that world peace is less marketable in a time where the fear of nuclear weapons made mass infantry warfare harder to bring about. (Are we forging into a new post-cold war era of large-scale land war as we speak?)
Any proposed means of addressing population as an actual problem rather than ostensible pretext would have to revolve around entirely voluntary decisions of individuals.
And before anyone brings up Japan or South Korea, I would like to point out that their economic situations are far from voluntary. South Korea was forced into a humiliating bargain known as the IMF crisis, which permanently altered their growth trajectory.
Japan experienced a similar readjustment with the Plaza Accords currency fixing scheme imposed by the US. Knowing what I know now about the global elites desire for population control, I believe that Japan and South Korea's continued economic austerity was a deliberate policy experiment. Could they make entire country's population implode through economic manipulation?
Then think of where they would want to apply that technique next. I think California is the experimental model for a US flavored anti-population growth economic austerity program. They are constantly innovating new laws that crush economic activity. (Remember Obama's "under our plan energy prices would necessarily skyrocket?")
So every flavor of modern population control leads to extremes of economic and social control by a tiny minority of self-anointed 'good club,' and yet we are supposed to believe that they are just addressing the problem honestly?
Let's see them ban private jets, yachts, and also sterilize themselves and their progeny to show their sincerity and then maybe we can start the conversation.