Promo Code: Utah Saint I feel like doing 9/11 for a while. The videographer of this footage is Jules Clément Naudet. Jules captured the only clear footage of the first jet, American Airlines Flight 11, hitting the North Tower of the World Trade Center
Dec 12, 2022·edited Dec 13, 2022Liked by Sage Hana
Understanding 911 is the key to understanding COVID. It is important to understand that all engineered events are hybrids of real and synthetic, with insufficient information to determine where one ends the other begins with any precision. This is so by design which creates an large gray area which sucks enormous amounts of people’s energy in arguing about not so relevant minutia. In 911, did planes hit the towers, was it explosives, thermite or direct energy that brought down the towers? In COVID, virus or not, natural or lab leak, etc. It isn’t as if these issues are unimportant to know. It is just that there is usually insufficient information to know with any certainty. What we do know in all these cases is that official narrative is utter fiction which is sustained regardless how many holes, how many paradoxes and inconsistencies that narrative has. All we need to know is that behind the forces which create a narrative, sustain it, and prevent any real investigations we can find the real culprits. This is so in all engineered events, JFK, 911, Oklahoma City bombing, Boston bombing, Vegas shooting,.... You will find the same exact patterns (with some variations) at work in all of them.
Why the World Trade Centre? Why two planes into a tower each? Sure seems convenient because both towers needed to be demolished anyway. It was going to cost a fortune to remove them with all that asbestos. Lucky Larry took out a big insurance policy on them covering terrorism just a few months prior to it happening. Lucky Larry had a dentist appointment that day.
And what of the dancing Israelis? When back in Israel and interviewed they were asked what they were doing in New York on that day and they said “dancing man!” No they didn’t ... just kidding. They said they were there to document the event. 🎤 drop.
"The account of career Flight Attendant Rebekah Roth who goes deep down the rabbit hole, and purports to debunk the passenger and flight attendant phone calls, which include some information that suggests that the plane is actually on the ground in a hangar when they occurred.
Roth has many revelations, one of which is that the planes had the ability to be commandeered remotely in the event of a hijacking. This would take control of the planes out of the hands of the pilots, the real ones or any hypothetical hijackers."
Sage!! You need to do a DEEP & thorough dive up and down "Ms. Roth's" hole... Stat. (All the heavy lifting was already done. Back in 2015 or so, if memory serves, but I'm OLD dammit.)
That's all I'm saying at this juncture. Back to reading.
Dec 12, 2022·edited Dec 12, 2022Liked by Sage Hana
I’m with you Sage. I used to be a huge film, concert and theatre buff. I can no longer enjoy as the Ithe subliminal narrative, predictive programming and woke bullshit everywhere. Saves my money and keeps me sane.
There were claims that the Naudet Bros were part of the op somehow. It made sense, but sorry, I can't recall the details right now.
b.
In one of the videos featuring the second plane's "nose in"/"nose out" production goof, they played a voice transmission with chopper noise, from some special radio channel, by a guy identifying with a military sounding call sign, asking "This so and so...Anybody on?" "Anybody on?".... ....That 'nose in'/'nose out' footage was one of the smoking guns. The news network went to black to try to conceal it, as some of the fakery was from live tv and there were goofs.
c. After 9/11, someone (probly was some video game players) figured out the game platform owners were connected, and that the video game platform was used for communications during the op. The regular video game players could not access the game platform during the op. Maybe that piqued their curiousity, so they looked into who owned the platform.
d. Another slam dunk puzzle piece was Sibel Edmonds. She was a turkish -american translator who got muzzled because she knew it was a high level op.
There were so many such little pieces of the puzzle, which I forgot by now. What a frikkin shit show.
I ain't no eyewitness. I just decided to add my "testimonial" to memorialize it on this medium. For what is worth:
It was early morning in San Diego. My wife and I were heading to work: a nice "tenant improved" site pharmaceutical gig in the the Sorrento Valley industrial area. Our commute would take us from La Jolla Village Dr. and a merge into the 805 before hitting the surface streets of the Valley. I remember the radio news talking about a hit on one of the WTC towers; in the car, we looked at each other and thought that it was a sick joke for the morning show! Once at work, we quickly found out that it was not a joke. I managed to call a close friend who was a post-doc at Columbia University (he was the "best man" on my wedding) and he described that he could see the billowing smoke, that far away. Coincidently, his post-doc boss was on the Science Advisory Board of the company and on site that day. I was taken aback by how detached this "Science Advisor" could be from what was happening at his town. Anyhow, on the subsequent weeks and months we grew accustomed to marines deployed at some places, in particular Coronado Bridge. Since then, I jumped from the frying pan and into the fire, leaving dysfunctional CA dystopian BC. Our most striking memory of the near 9/11 madness was when, on an international trip from Canada and trough the US circa 2004, the wonderful algorithms that were keeping the US safe decided that my wife and our 2 year old daughter were deserving of a more complete pat down. I cannot describe the clown show that ensued, which included mom and doughtier separated, patted down, carry on luggage inspected (I mean, a pink, Disney princess stamped carry on MUST be dangerous), crying loudly (my daughter, anyways), while I could only watch helplessly having passed the threshold of the anointed. Fucked Up.
My uncle had an appointment at WVU Hospital that morning. He said he was walking across the parking lot to the building when he saw and heard two fighters going overhead.
Said the lead plane fired a missile and both peeled off slightly, then continued on roughly the same NW heading.
Geography and timing works out.
He believed most of the story except this part. He believed the PA plane was brought down and the whole passenger hero bit was made as a cover for having to shoot down a hijacked plane heading for DC.
I don’t know how this fits in. I know most of the air traffic was in disarray because of the ‘exercise’ NORAD was running that day. Would it be possible for two fighters that hadn’t been read in to have acted on standing orders concerning DC when no other verification was possible?
Dunno. He was pretty sure of what he saw. He was a Vietnam vet. He was at that appointment for a kidney check, as he’d been sprayed with Agent Orange. He’d seen air fights from the ground before.
Dec 12, 2022·edited Dec 12, 2022Liked by Sage Hana
I think we need someone like Marshall Flinkman from Alias with his hi-tech equipment.
"Can you get a closer shot of that one area there, where the plane hits the building? Good. Now, can you clean it up?" Oh sure, Marshall had a program for that. Crystal clear. Would probably take him 20 minutes.
Check out the google street view. Collect screenshots just in case. Interesting to compare. And look up maps of old WTC and new WTC. Compare pictures.
I can’t quite pick out the name, address, phone, etc of the coffee shop in the video. Interesting that there’s a hipster joint there now. Also, the don’t walk sign in the video is out of focus, but nothing else at that distance is. I’m not a film expert, and I know the old analog stuff could produce those kinds of artifacts, but it’d be interesting to hear an expert opinion on those kinds of details. Are they unusual or usual? Honest question, I don’t know.
Also, does it seem strange to anyone else that the filmmakers knew to follow the plane while none of those who were curious enough to look up did? Not until they noticed the camera do it? It seems to me the order was firefighter looks up, then his two comrades, then the cameraman, then everyone looked back down, but the cameraman followed the plane. Then the others looked up? Someone should find out how those two firefighters died. Almost certainly they’re dead, even if they didn’t die that day.
Understanding 911 is the key to understanding COVID. It is important to understand that all engineered events are hybrids of real and synthetic, with insufficient information to determine where one ends the other begins with any precision. This is so by design which creates an large gray area which sucks enormous amounts of people’s energy in arguing about not so relevant minutia. In 911, did planes hit the towers, was it explosives, thermite or direct energy that brought down the towers? In COVID, virus or not, natural or lab leak, etc. It isn’t as if these issues are unimportant to know. It is just that there is usually insufficient information to know with any certainty. What we do know in all these cases is that official narrative is utter fiction which is sustained regardless how many holes, how many paradoxes and inconsistencies that narrative has. All we need to know is that behind the forces which create a narrative, sustain it, and prevent any real investigations we can find the real culprits. This is so in all engineered events, JFK, 911, Oklahoma City bombing, Boston bombing, Vegas shooting,.... You will find the same exact patterns (with some variations) at work in all of them.
Why the World Trade Centre? Why two planes into a tower each? Sure seems convenient because both towers needed to be demolished anyway. It was going to cost a fortune to remove them with all that asbestos. Lucky Larry took out a big insurance policy on them covering terrorism just a few months prior to it happening. Lucky Larry had a dentist appointment that day.
Woo-hoo!! Another Sage Hana post hits my inbox! I’ve been waiting all day for this!!😃😂
And yes, I want answers!!!🧐
"I only want to know what is real".
Me too but...
One shit show at a time. Not done with Operation Warp Speed of Science yet. My brain is shorting out.
From the takes one to know one dept:
Conspiracy junkie visits a monstrous conspiracy for a little vacation from the other monstrous conspiracy.
;-)
And what of the dancing Israelis? When back in Israel and interviewed they were asked what they were doing in New York on that day and they said “dancing man!” No they didn’t ... just kidding. They said they were there to document the event. 🎤 drop.
Paused:
"The account of career Flight Attendant Rebekah Roth who goes deep down the rabbit hole, and purports to debunk the passenger and flight attendant phone calls, which include some information that suggests that the plane is actually on the ground in a hangar when they occurred.
Roth has many revelations, one of which is that the planes had the ability to be commandeered remotely in the event of a hijacking. This would take control of the planes out of the hands of the pilots, the real ones or any hypothetical hijackers."
Sage!! You need to do a DEEP & thorough dive up and down "Ms. Roth's" hole... Stat. (All the heavy lifting was already done. Back in 2015 or so, if memory serves, but I'm OLD dammit.)
That's all I'm saying at this juncture. Back to reading.
"Over."
Sage wrote: 95-5 Team No Plane at Pentagon and PA.
reply: I maybe closer to 99-1 on the pentagon. I don't believe any plane of size crashed in PA related to 911
As usual, you bring all your talent to bear when you go down the rabbit hole. You’re in my prayers. Be safe.
I’m with you Sage. I used to be a huge film, concert and theatre buff. I can no longer enjoy as the Ithe subliminal narrative, predictive programming and woke bullshit everywhere. Saves my money and keeps me sane.
Recalling random bits.....
a.
There were claims that the Naudet Bros were part of the op somehow. It made sense, but sorry, I can't recall the details right now.
b.
In one of the videos featuring the second plane's "nose in"/"nose out" production goof, they played a voice transmission with chopper noise, from some special radio channel, by a guy identifying with a military sounding call sign, asking "This so and so...Anybody on?" "Anybody on?".... ....That 'nose in'/'nose out' footage was one of the smoking guns. The news network went to black to try to conceal it, as some of the fakery was from live tv and there were goofs.
c. After 9/11, someone (probly was some video game players) figured out the game platform owners were connected, and that the video game platform was used for communications during the op. The regular video game players could not access the game platform during the op. Maybe that piqued their curiousity, so they looked into who owned the platform.
d. Another slam dunk puzzle piece was Sibel Edmonds. She was a turkish -american translator who got muzzled because she knew it was a high level op.
There were so many such little pieces of the puzzle, which I forgot by now. What a frikkin shit show.
I ain't no eyewitness. I just decided to add my "testimonial" to memorialize it on this medium. For what is worth:
It was early morning in San Diego. My wife and I were heading to work: a nice "tenant improved" site pharmaceutical gig in the the Sorrento Valley industrial area. Our commute would take us from La Jolla Village Dr. and a merge into the 805 before hitting the surface streets of the Valley. I remember the radio news talking about a hit on one of the WTC towers; in the car, we looked at each other and thought that it was a sick joke for the morning show! Once at work, we quickly found out that it was not a joke. I managed to call a close friend who was a post-doc at Columbia University (he was the "best man" on my wedding) and he described that he could see the billowing smoke, that far away. Coincidently, his post-doc boss was on the Science Advisory Board of the company and on site that day. I was taken aback by how detached this "Science Advisor" could be from what was happening at his town. Anyhow, on the subsequent weeks and months we grew accustomed to marines deployed at some places, in particular Coronado Bridge. Since then, I jumped from the frying pan and into the fire, leaving dysfunctional CA dystopian BC. Our most striking memory of the near 9/11 madness was when, on an international trip from Canada and trough the US circa 2004, the wonderful algorithms that were keeping the US safe decided that my wife and our 2 year old daughter were deserving of a more complete pat down. I cannot describe the clown show that ensued, which included mom and doughtier separated, patted down, carry on luggage inspected (I mean, a pink, Disney princess stamped carry on MUST be dangerous), crying loudly (my daughter, anyways), while I could only watch helplessly having passed the threshold of the anointed. Fucked Up.
They just had a nice tribute for Richard Gage , he died around thanksgiving. He spoke up for years.
My uncle had an appointment at WVU Hospital that morning. He said he was walking across the parking lot to the building when he saw and heard two fighters going overhead.
Said the lead plane fired a missile and both peeled off slightly, then continued on roughly the same NW heading.
Geography and timing works out.
He believed most of the story except this part. He believed the PA plane was brought down and the whole passenger hero bit was made as a cover for having to shoot down a hijacked plane heading for DC.
I don’t know how this fits in. I know most of the air traffic was in disarray because of the ‘exercise’ NORAD was running that day. Would it be possible for two fighters that hadn’t been read in to have acted on standing orders concerning DC when no other verification was possible?
Dunno. He was pretty sure of what he saw. He was a Vietnam vet. He was at that appointment for a kidney check, as he’d been sprayed with Agent Orange. He’d seen air fights from the ground before.
I think we need someone like Marshall Flinkman from Alias with his hi-tech equipment.
"Can you get a closer shot of that one area there, where the plane hits the building? Good. Now, can you clean it up?" Oh sure, Marshall had a program for that. Crystal clear. Would probably take him 20 minutes.
Check out the google street view. Collect screenshots just in case. Interesting to compare. And look up maps of old WTC and new WTC. Compare pictures.
I can’t quite pick out the name, address, phone, etc of the coffee shop in the video. Interesting that there’s a hipster joint there now. Also, the don’t walk sign in the video is out of focus, but nothing else at that distance is. I’m not a film expert, and I know the old analog stuff could produce those kinds of artifacts, but it’d be interesting to hear an expert opinion on those kinds of details. Are they unusual or usual? Honest question, I don’t know.
Also, does it seem strange to anyone else that the filmmakers knew to follow the plane while none of those who were curious enough to look up did? Not until they noticed the camera do it? It seems to me the order was firefighter looks up, then his two comrades, then the cameraman, then everyone looked back down, but the cameraman followed the plane. Then the others looked up? Someone should find out how those two firefighters died. Almost certainly they’re dead, even if they didn’t die that day.